District Attorney

District Attorney

June 4, 2024 - Fatal Officer Involved Shooting of Andrew Hyun Song

CCDA File: 005-357934

June 4, 2024

On May 29th and May 30th, 2024, the Clackamas County District Attorney' s Office presented a grand jury panel with the investigation of the officer involved fatal shooting of Andrew Hyun Song, which occurred April 30th, 2024. A grand jury is a body of seven Clackamas County citizens drawn by the court at random from the pool of jurors selected to serve during a particular jury service term.

The grand jurors heard testimony from the involved officers, witnesses, and investigators. The grand jury also reviewed evidence collected in the case including but not limited to body worn camera footage, photographs, and surveillance footage. Following deliberations, the grand jurors determined by a unanimous vote that the actions of the involved officers and deputies were justified and lawful under Oregon law.

The investigation into the death of Mr. Song was led by the Clackamas County Interagency Major Crimes Team in cooperation with the Clackamas County District Attorney' s Office. The Major Crimes Team (MCT) is a consortium of state, county and local law enforcement who investigate serious crimes in Clackamas County. In this case, investigators from Molalla Police Department and the Oregon City Police Department were the lead investigators with assistance from the following law enforcement agencies:

  • Oregon State Police
  • Milwaukie Police Department
  • Lake Oswego Police Department
  • West Linn Police Department
  • Gladstone Police Department
  • Tigard Police Department
  • Tualatin Police Department

All these agencies were also assisted by the Interagency Crime Reconstruction and Forensics Technicians (CRAFT) as well as the Crime Scene Investigation Team.

Facts Presented to the Grand Jury

The Grand Jury heard that on April 29th , 2024, at 8:35 PM officers responded to 9689 South East Westview Court, Happy Valley, Oregon regarding reports that Andrew "Andy" Song was walking around his house with a knife, acting paranoid, trying to hurt himself, and barricading his family inside. Mr. Song had taken his wife's phone away. Also in the house were their two children, ages 11 and 12. Mrs. Song was able to reach out to family members using her work cell that Mr. Song was unaware of and started asking for help. Extended family requested a welfare check.

When the officers arrived, they attempted to contact Mr. Song who refused to open the door and refused to let officers speak to his wife and children. Officers reported smelling an overwhelming odor of gasoline coming from the vents, and that all points of entry were barricaded. Officers continued to attempt to contact Mr. Song's wife and children, but Mr. Song refused to answer the door and was coaching his family to tell officers they were fine. During one of their communications with Mr. Song, he admitted to spilling gasoline in the home. Officers reported seeing a lighter flicking on and off, causing officers greater concern given the presence of gasoline.

Due to the high-risk nature of the call, the danger to both the Song family, as well as neighbors and police patrol, deputies requested the assistance of the Clackamas County SWAT Team, Crisis Negotiation Team and Clackamas Fire and Rescue.

In addition to the Clackamas County SWAT Team and Crises Negotiation Team, the Washington County Tactical Negotiations Team (TNT) and the Washington County Crises Negotiation Unit (CNU) responded to support the units already on scene. This deployment of additional resources is standard practice in incidents that may require more personnel or present tactical situations where additional resources are required.

The incident evolved rapidly into a hostage rescue situation in which the deputies and officers faced many life-threatening dynamics not normally encountered. Since gasoline had been dispersed in the house and there were children inside, the combustible fuel and vapors presented a limitation on less than lethal options such as the use of pyrotechnics or distraction devices. Additionally, law enforcement could see that Mr. Song was in possession of a lighter/ignition source that he was seen flicking on and off. Furthermore, the entrances to the residence were all barricaded by Mr. Song with household goods and furniture, making any rapid entry into the home or a hasty exit for Mr. Song's family nearly impossible.

SWAT and crisis negotiation teams spent multiple hours trying to negotiate with Mr. Song and deescalate the situation to reach a peaceful resolution. Officers placed a camera on a window above the front door and used a drone to capture video of what was taking place inside the home. Mr. Song could be seen carrying a large kitchen knife, forcing his family to move to different points in the house and often using them as shields. For over four hours, officers attempted to resolve this in a manner that did not lead to injury to any of the parties involved. However, Mr. Song eventually told officers that in five minutes he would "slit" the throat of a member of his family.

Mr. Song was seen using a family member as a human shield as he moved about the house while still holding the knife and then eventually gathered his family together into a tight group and covered them and himself with a blanket. Mr. Song continued to move himself and his family around the house while covered and armed, which frustrated the ability of rescuers to see and take life-saving action. With a countdown now put in place by Mr. Song, the presence of explosive vapors and combustible fuels, Mr. Song being armed and holding his family hostage and law enforcement unable to use may less than lethal techniques, it was imperative to end the event as quickly as possible.

Tactical team members could see the blanket-covered Song family moving upstairs and felt this was their last and best opportunity to save the lives of the Song family. SWAT entered the house at 1:00 AM through the heavily barricaded front door. SWAT could not use any form of explosive to eradicate the barricade that prevented entrance due to the presence of gasoline throughout the home.

Once inside, SWAT Team members saw Mr. Song pinning his wife to the ground and holding a knife to her throat as she tried to escape. Detective Jesse Unck of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office gave multiple orders to drop the knife. Mr. Song did not drop the knife and Detective Unck and Officer Charles Wujcik of the Beaverton Police Department fired a combined total of 6 shots at close range to save Ms. Song's life. Ms. Song and her children were rescued by officers and suffered no serious physical injuries. Mr. Song died immediately at the scene.

Crime scene investigators located multiple knives and sharp objects staged throughout the house, and multiple uncapped gas cans, paper towels, and gas cans stuffed with paper towels. Multiple lighters were also found in the house and in Mr. Song's pocket. Crime scene investigators observed that each point of entry into the home was heavily barricaded. The majority, if not all, of law enforcement's interactions with Mr. Song were captured via body worn camera footage, including the point where officers used deadly physical force.

Legal Analysis

Oregon law provides that a peace officer may use deadly physical force when the peace officer reasonably believes that the use of deadly physical force is necessary to defend the peace officer or another person from the use or threatened imminent use of deadly physical force, or the officer' s life or personal safety is endangered in the particular circumstances involved. ORS 161.239(1) (c) and (e). The "reasonableness" inquiry is whether the officer' s actions are "objectively reasonable" in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation.

The "reasonableness" of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, and its calculus must embody an allowance for 005-347738|OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING OF ANDREW SONGthe fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second decisions about the amount of force necessary in a particular situation. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 296-97 (1989).

Additionally, Oregon law states that prior to using deadly physical force upon another person, if the peace officer has a reasonable opportunity to do so, the peace officer shall:

  1. Consider alternatives such as verbal de-escalation, waiting, using other available resources and techniques if reasonable, safe, and feasible, or using a lesser degree of force; and
  2. Give a verbal warning to the person that deadly physical force may be used and provide the person with a reasonable opportunity to comply.

Officers spent over 4 hours attempting to deescalate the situation and only chose to forcibly enter the home after Mr. Song stated he would kill a family member within 5 minutes.

Officers and Deputies could not use less than lethal options that would cause ignition of the fuel vapors or would pose a threat to the family being held hostage. Had law enforcement been able to separate Mrs. Song and her children from Mr. Song and extricate them from the house they would have done so.

Conclusion

The grand jury unanimously concluded that Detective Unck and Officer Wujcik were justified in their use of deadly physical force against Mr. Song.

The grand jury has completed its review of this case and will take no further action. (Note: the inclusion of body camera images and photos has been omitted in this public report due to capturing the images of crime victims which include minor children and show tactics used by law enforcement in hostage rescues).

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Victim Assistance Program

A Victim’s Guide Rights & Services

24 HOUR CRISIS LINE 503-655-8616

Under Oregon Law, YOU have certain rights as the victim in a criminal case. It is important that you know these rights. Please read the information carefully and note that it is your responsibility in exercising your rights at each step in the case.

When Criminal Charges are Filed With the Court

  • You have the right to be reasonably protected from the defendant throughout the entire criminal justice process.
  • You have the right to be present at, and upon specific request, to be informed in advance of any critical stage of the proceedings held in open court when the defendant will be present, and to be heard at the pretrial release hearing and the sentencing or juvenile court delinquency disposition

When the Defendant Appears in Court

  • If you request, you have the right to have your current address and phone number kept from the defendant
  • You have the right to a court hearing if you are being intimidated or threatened by the defendant.
  • You have the right to refuse an interview, deposition or other requests by the defendant or any person acting on behalf of the defendant.
  • You have the right to be told the identity of persons working for the defendant. You do not have to talk to or make a formal statement to anyone representing the defendant unless you choose to. You may request to have a deputy district attorney present if you do decide to speak with them.
  • If you request, you have the right to be consulted by the deputy district attorney about plea negotiations on your case, if the case involves a felony crime.
  • If you request, you have the right to be informed of any changes in court dates and hearing (includes pre-trial and trial).

When The Case Goes To Trial

  • You have the right to have all relevant evidence admissible against the defendant.
  • You have the right to obtain a copy of a transcript of any court proceeding in open court (if one is prepared), at a reasonable cost to you.

At Sentencing

  • You have the right to personally express your views to the court as a Victim Impact Statement or to ask the deputy district attorney to do so for you, or you can hire an attorney (at your own expense) to express your views.
  • You have the right to have the judge consider ordering a compensatory fine to be paid to you by the convicted criminal when the evidence supports such an order.
  • You have the right to know, at the time of sentencing, the actual length of time the defendant will serve in custody.

After Sentencing

  • You have the right to receive restitution from the convicted criminal who caused your loss or injury.
  • If you request, you have the right to obtain information about the conviction, sentence, imprisonment, criminal history and future release from physical custody of the defendant, convicted criminal (or youth).
  • If you request, and provide the Board of Post-Prison Supervision with your address, you have the right to be notified of, and appear at, any Parole Hearings. The Board must be updated with your current mailing address.
  • If you request, you have the right to be notified 30 days before the convicted criminal is released from prison.

Available Services

  • 24-hour Crisis Line for support and crisis intervention; regardless of law enforcement involvement.
  • Assistance with applications of Domestic, Stalking, Sexual Assault & Elder Abuse Protective Orders.
  • Advocating for & informing victims of Victim Rights.
  • Liaison between the victim of a crime and the prosecutor or law enforcement agency, as requested.
  • General information regarding the process of the criminal justice system with court accompaniment, as requested by the victim.
  • Referrals to community service agencies, shelters and counselors.
  • Assistance in filing for financial compensation from the State of Oregon Department of Justice through the Crime Victims Compensation Program.

You have the right to be informed as soon as practical of Victim Rights. If you have questions about these rights contact:

Victim Assistance Program
503-655-8616

District Attorney
503-655-8431

The Law Enforcement Agency
where the crime was reported.

The Clackamas County District Attorney’s Office Victim Assistance Program complies with applicable federal civil rights laws and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or age.

The 1999 Constitutional changes were enacted by the people and the Legislature of the State of Oregon. These provisions give you the rights set forth in this brochure and set the guidelines for the services provided by the Department of Justice-approved and prosecutor-based victim services program serving your needs in Clackamas County. You are encouraged to become familiar with your rights and ensure that your wishes are known to the District Attorney’s Office and its Victim Assistance program.

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Michel Fournier sentenced to life in prison for murdering his wife

A Clackamas County jury found Michel Fournier guilty Thursday of murdering his wife in 2024 shortly after she filed for divorce. 

Fournier, 72, was convicted on charges of Murder in the Second Degree and Unlawful Use of a Weapon after an eight-day trial in Clackamas County Circuit Court. He was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 25 years. 

Fournier murdered his estranged wife, Susan Marie Lane, 61, at their Brightwood home on Nov. 22, 2024, shooting her in the head, neck and chest with a .22-caliber rifle.