Planning and Zoning

Planning and Zoning

ZDO-293

Ordinance ZDO-293, Minor and Time Sensitive Comprehensive Plan and ZDO Amendments proposes amendments to the county’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning & Development Ordinance (ZDO) that are intended to accomplish the following five actions:

  1. Implement state mandates, which were adopted through legislation or administrative rulemaking, that are currently in effect or will become effective by July 1, 2026; 
  2. Align the County’s requirements in Agriculture and Forest zones with state law; 
  3. Amend certain height limit and dock prohibition standards within the Willamette River Greenway (WRG);
  4. Clarify how to identify front, rear, and side lot lines for the purpose of structure setback measurement; and 
  5. Make minor changes to the Comprehensive Plan and ZDO clarify provisions, reduce administrative barriers, and correct citations and typographical errors. 

A summary of the changes proposed for each section of the Comprehensive Plan and the ZDO are included below. To obtain emailed or printed copies of the full text of the proposed amendments, please contact Planning & Zoning at 503-742-4500 or zoninginfo@clackamas.us.

Notice of Land Use Public Hearings

for Community Planning Organizations, Hamlets, and Other Interested Parties

Subject: Ordinance ZDO-293: Minor and Time Sensitive Comprehensive Plan and ZDO Amendments FY2026 

Notice Date: April 6, 2026

Contact: Martha Fritzie, Principal Planner
150 Beavercreek Road, Oregon City, OR 97045
Phone: 503-742-4529
Email: mfritzie@clackamas.us

Minor and Time-Sensitive Comprehensive Plan and ZDO Amendments is a Planning project that is intended to be completed annually and focuses on relatively minor changes to the County’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning and Development Ordinance (ZDO) that are necessary to comply with any new state and federal mandates, clarify existing language, correct errors, or adopt optional provisions that require only minimal analysis.

Ordinance ZDO-293 includes the minor and time sensitive amendments for fiscal year 2026 (FY22026) and proposes changes to one chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and 36 sections of the ZDO; the repeal of one ZDO section; and the addition of two new ZDO sections, in order to accomplish the following five actions:

  1. Implement state mandates, which were adopted through legislation or administrative rulemaking, that are currently in effect or will become effective by July 1, 2026;
  2. Align the County’s requirements in Agriculture and Forest zones with state law;
  3. Amend certain height limit and dock prohibition standards within the Willamette River Greenway (WRG);
  4. Clarify how to identify front, rear, and side lot lines for the purpose of structure setback measurement; and
  5. Make minor changes to the Comprehensive Plan and ZDO clarify provisions, reduce administrative barriers, and correct citations and typographical errors. 

The Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners have scheduled hearings to receive testimony from the public and other interested parties on the proposed amendments. Because the amendments may affect your community or area of interest, we are giving you and your organization advance notice of the opportunity to review and comment on them before or at the public hearings.

A summary of the amendments proposed for each section of the ZDO will be available online. To obtain emailed or printed copies of the full text of the proposed amendments, please contact Planning & Zoning at 503-742-4500 or zoninginfo@clackamas.us.

Public Hearings and Testimony

Interested parties are welcome to provide testimony in advance of or at the hearings listed below. The Planning Commission public hearings are held virtually using the Zoom platform. The Board of County Commissioners public hearings are held both in-person and virtually using the Zoom platform. One week before the hearing dates, a Zoom link to the public hearing and details on how to observe and testify will be posted at the hearing web address.

Public Hearing Dates and Times:

Written testimony may be submitted before the hearings to Martha Fritzie at mfritzie@clackamas.us or 150 Beavercreek Road, Oregon City, OR 97045.

  • Written testimony received by 4 p.m., Wednesday, April 29, 2026, will be included in the information packet provided to the Planning Commission one week before its scheduled hearing; written testimony received after that time and before 10 a.m., Monday, May 11, 2026, will be emailed to the Planning Commission before the hearing. If the Planning Commission continues the May 11th hearing, additional testimony submittal deadlines will be identified at that hearing.
  • Written testimony received by 4 p.m., Monday, June 1, 2026, will be included in the information packet provided to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) one week before its scheduled hearing; written testimony received after that time and before 4 p.m., Monday, June 15, 2026, will be emailed to the BCC before the hearing. If the BCC continues the June 16th hearing, additional testimony submittal deadlines will be identified at that hearing.

Interested parties who want to present verbal testimony at either hearing will be asked to sign up and/or indicate their interest in testifying at the beginning of the hearing.

Overview of Proposed Amendments

Ordinance ZDO-293 proposes changes to accomplish the following five actions.

  1. Implement state mandates, which were adopted through legislation or administrative rulemaking, that are currently in effect or will become effective by July 1, 2026. 
    Generally, these mandates relate to urban housing (procedural and substantive changes); on-site parking in the urban area; and requirements to allow certain uses outright, including childcare centers, emergency shelters, residential treatment facilities and homes, mental and psychiatric hospitals, and crisis stabilization centers. Many of these changes would be limited to the urban area. 
    ZDO-293 includes amendments to include these mandatory items in the county’s ZDO, including:
    • Amending the Middle Housing Land Division (MHLD) process to allow shared water/wastewater facilities; allow a MHLD before, during and after middle housing building permits; and offer concurrent review of MHLD and partition/ subdivision; and
    • Amending the Expedited Land Division (ELD) process to reflect new requirements for no public notice; no public hearing; no allowance for any party to intervene in opposition; and that the applicant is the only party required to receive Notice of Decision and eligible to appeal.
    • Ensuring certain housing developments with Include 20 or more units of new single-family dwellings, manufactured dwellings, or middle housing within the Portland Metro urban growth boundary (UGB) are not subject to certain design standards related to such features as façade materials; roof decorations, form, or materials; or other architectural features.
    • Allowing for an applicant of a housing application within the UGB to “opt in” to new standards if they have become effective after application was submitted, if public notice has not been issued
    • Including standards for a new applicant type, called an “urban housing application”, for a residential zone change, planned unit development or variance. The process for this application would include notice to property owners within 300 feet and a comment window of 14 days, but limited appeal rights.
    • Including standards for another new application type that applies to housing applications in certain urban and rural areas that are reviewed under only clear & objective standards. The process for this application also requires property owners and only the applicant may appeal a decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals.
    • Allowing childcare facilities in farm zones, subject to certain criteria related to serving children in rural areas and must collocate with community center or school
    • Allowing by right certain specific uses and, where necessary, including a new definition to the ZDO for the specified use, including
      • A residential treatment facility or residential home within a UGB on certain publicly-owned lands and lands zoned for residential commercial, employment, and industrial uses.
      • A mental or psychiatric hospital and adjacent crisis stabilization center within a UGB on certain commercial, industrial or publicly-owned lands.
      • A preschool or pre-kindergarten with place of worship (does not apply if place of worship is a nonconforming use)
      • An emergency shelter that meet certain defined criteria within a UGB. This requirement sunsets if the most recently completed point-in-time count indicates the total sheltered and unsheltered homeless population is less than 0.18 percent of the state population
      • A childcare center in multifamily residential, commercial, and light industrial zones.
    • Implementing changes related to parking and parking lots within the UGB that are currently in effect but are being administered directly from state law. ZDO-293 would include the amendments necessary to implement the parking rules through the ZDO, which will reduce confusion for applicants and make administration more efficient for staff. These amendments would apply to property in urban zones within the UGB and generally include the following:
    • Removal of references to minimum off-street parking requirements
    • Amended off-street parking maximums for certain locations
    • New tree canopy and other design standards for parking lots > 0.5 acre.
  2. Align the County’s requirements in Agriculture and Forest zones with state law. 
    Ordinance ZDO-293 includes proposed amendments resulting from an audit of the Exclusive Farm Use, Timber and Ag/Forest zones to ensure they are consistent with, and no more restrictive than, state law. The proposal would:
    • Remove references to State Wildfire Map that was repealed in 2025 (also affects some rural residential lands)
    • Remove extensive table of uses and replace with a statement that uses permitted in the AG/F District are those allowed in the EFU District, subject to standards in the EFU District, and those allowed in the TBR District, subject to the standards in the TBR District, and subject to certain limitations. This is not a substantive change, rather it is proposed for clarity and to ensure that future code amendments do not inadvertently create inconsistency between Ag/F and EFU and TBR.
    • Reorganize some standards to be more consistent with structure in state law to make future amendments easier.
    • Incorporate amendments from recent state rulemaking that codified certain common law standards related to
    • Farm impacts test analyses
    • Agri-tourism events standards
    • Transportation facilities subject to farm impacts test
    • Private park definition and clarifications
  3. Amend certain height limit and dock prohibition standards within the Willamette River Greenway (WRG). The Willamette River Greenway (WRG), established through Statewide Planning Goal 15, is a corridor of water and land in which development is planned and built with recognition of the unique qualities of the Willamette River. Ordinance ZDO-293 proposed two specific amendments within the WRG.
    • Repeal an unnecessary dock prohibition affecting certain areas of the WRG. There are two stretches of the Willamette River – called Limited Use areas - in which new private non-commercial docks are prohibited.
      However, based on an analysis of lots, existing dwellings, and existing docks within the two Limited Use areas, staff have found that all but three of the lots within the Limited Use areas that have river frontage and a dwelling already have a dock, and that none of the vacant lots with river frontage in the Limited Use areas are zoned for residential development. In addition, there is no state requirement to prohibit docks anywhere on the river and there is no basis or evidence in the county’s records to warrant the dock prohibition.
      Ordinance ZDO-293 would repeal the prohibition on new docks in the Limited Use area and allow private, non-commercial docks to be established as an accessory use, subject to the same standards and processes as such docks elsewhere on the river.
    • Remove the 35-foot height limit for properties located within the WRG and designated as High Density Residential (HDR). Currently the ZDO limits the height for all residential development within the WRG boundary to 35 feet. Inside the UGB, the vast majority of residential lots within the WRG boundary are in a low-density residential designation, which has a height limit of 35 feet for development even outside the WRG. There are, however, a limited number of lots within the WRG that have a High Density Residential (HDR) zoning designation The HDR zoning district is intended for multifamily development; currently has a maximum allowed density of 25 dwelling units per acre; and has no specified height limit outside the WRG.
      A property owner within the WRG requested the county consider removing the 35-foot height limit so that more housing could be developed. Ordinance ZDO-293 includes this consideration and would remove the 35-foot height limit for lots within the WRG that are also within the HDR zoning district.
  4. Clarify how to identify front, rear, and side lot lines for the purpose of structure setback measurement. The way that setbacks are reviewed has not changed substantially since the ZDO was adopted in 1980. At that time, the shape and dimensions of lots were strictly controlled, which allowed for a relatively rigid set of setback rules. Since then, however, many of the standards controlling lot shape and dimensions have been repealed, nonconforming lots are no longer required to be consolidated, new access and life safety requirements outside the ZDO have changed the way developments are constructed, and changes to state and local rules regarding infill development have resulted in lot configuration and development that was not contemplated when the 1980 ZDO was drafted. As a result, the current setback rules sometimes create conflicts and confusion when applied to certain lots.
    The proposal under ZDO-293 will not change required setback distances. Rather it seeks to clarify how the front lot line is identified for setback purposes, thereby addressing some of the most common administrative challenges identified by staff, including:
    • Private access easements
    • Fire turnarounds
    • Unusual flag lots
    • Rounded and “unintentional” corner lots
      Ordinance ZDO-293 includes amendments to provide these clarifications.
  5. Make minor changes to the Comprehensive Plan and ZDO clarify provisions, reduce administrative barriers, and correct citations and typographical errors. 
    • Remove references to a zoning district that has been repealed.
    • Remove the limit on refiling applications, which requires staff to make a determination about whether the application is “substantially similar” to the previous application.
    • Remove option for a two-year time extension for most land use applications and extend the approval period for those application by two years to reduce administrative burdens on both applicants and staff. Time extensions in EFU, AG/F, and TBR Districts will remain, pursuant to relevant state law requirements.
    • Revise an outdated provision required by the Metro Code.
    • Clarify provisions that routinely cause confusion for staff and customers.
    • Correct citations and typographical errors.

Additional Information and Staff Report

or

or

Clackamas County is committed to providing meaningful access and will make reasonable accommodations, modifications, or provide translation, interpretation or other services upon request. Please contact us at 503-742-4545 or email DRenhard@clackamas.us.

503-742-4545:¿Traducción e interpretación? |Требуется ли вам устный или письменный перевод? |翻译或口译?| Cấn Biên dịch hoặc Phiên dịch? | 번역 또는 통역?

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3, Natural Resources and Energy

  1. Remove policy prohibiting docks in Limited Use area of Willamette River Greenway 
  2. Amend policy to allow for residential buildings in a high density residential designation within the Willamette River Greenway to exceed 35 feet in height.  

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 202, Definitions

  1. Amend definitions of Child Care Facility, Family Child Care Home and add definition of Child Care Center, pursuant to HB 3109[2021] and HB 3560[2025]. 
  2. Add definition of Residential Treatment Facility and Residential Treatment Home, pursuant to HB 2005 [2025] 
  3. Clarify that an Access Drive serves exactly two lots or parcels.
  4. Clarify that a lot within the curve of a single road where the curve contains multiple radii is not a corner lot.
  5. Clarify provisions related to triangular shaped lots apply to lots with only three lot lines, or lots that front on curved streets with only two other lot lines.
  6. Clarify that emergency vehicle turnaround and pullout areas that are contained within easements across private properties should be considered side lot lines when measuring setbacks, unless motor vehicle access to the subject property also crosses the emergency vehicle turnaround and pullout area.
  7. Clarify definition of Lot Line, Rear to address situations where a lot has a limited extent of front lot line.
  8. Amend definition of Building Line to address corner lots, through lots, and lots where the building is not constructed exactly parallel to the front lot line. 
  9. Add definitions for Private Street and Internal Street.
  10. Amend definition of Property Line Adjustment to reflect past practice of allowing multiple line segments of a single boundary to be adjusted with one application.
  11. Add definition of Boundary Line.
  12. Add definition of Parking Area, Motor Vehicle.
  13. Add definitions for Driveway, Drive Aisle, and Internal Street.
  14. Amend definition of Lot Area or Lot Size to allow property owners to measure to road centerlines along their frontage(s) in areas with Comprehensive Plan designations of Rural, Agriculture, or Forest. 
  15. Remove definitions for terms no longer used in the ZDO and make other clarifying edits.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 315, Urban Low Density Residential (R-2.5, R-5, R-7, R-8.5, R-10, R-15, R-20, and R-30), Village Standard Lot Residential (VR-5/7), Village Small Lot Residential (VR-4/5), Village Townhouse (VTH), Planned Medium Density Residential (PMD), Medium Density Residential (MR-1), Medium High Density Residential (MR-2), High Density Residential (HDR), Village Apartment (VA), Special High Density Residential (SHD), and Regional Center High Density Residential (RCHDR) Districts

  1. Allow child care centers as primary use in all urban residential zones that allow at least 17 dwelling units per acre and allow child care centers as primary use in all urban residential zones if collocated with certain types of institutional uses, pursuant to HB 3109[2021] and HB 3560[2025].
  2. Allow emergency shelter to be sited in all urban residential zones, if standards in new Section 848 are met, including specific requirements for the entity that must operate the shelter. May not be sited within regulated hazard areas and allowance will sunset if state homeless population is less than 0.18% of total state population, pursuant to ORS 197.782 – 783. 
  3. Allow residential treatment facilities and residential treatment homes as a primary use in all residential zones, subject to standards in new Section 849, pursuant to HB 2005 [2025].
  4. Exempt developments with 20 or more dwelling units from the building design standards in Table 315-2 and Table 315-3, pursuant to SB 974[2025].

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 316, Rural Area Residential 1-Acre (RA-1), Rural Area Residential 2-Acre (RA-2), Recreational Residential (RR), Rural Residential Farm Forest 5-Acre (RRFF-5), Farm Forest 10-Acre (FF-10), and Future Urban 10-Acre (FU-10) Districts 

  1. Allow child care centers as primary if located within the Portland Metro Urban Growth Boundary (PMUGB) and collocated with certain institutional uses, pursuant to HB 3109[2021] and HB 3560[2025].
  2. Add “NA” notation in Table 316-1 to clarify where certain listed uses are not applicable to a particular zoning district. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 401, Exclusive Farm Use District (EFU)

  1. Allow “child care facilities, preschool recorded programs or school-age recorded programs” for children of residents and workers of the rural area in which the facility or program is located and provided the use must collocate with community center or school.
  2. “Audit” the entire section for consistency with requirements of state law and edit as needed for compliance.
  3. Update for consistency with Oregon Administrative Rule amendments that became effective in January 2025. Amendments pertain to the analysis required for the farm/forest impacts test, tax return transcript requirement for permits that are dependent on demonstrating farm income, limits on certain home occupations, agri-tourism-related definitions, the definition of “private park,” and clarifying which transportation uses are subject to the farm/forest impacts test.  
  4. Repeal the fire hardening construction standards that were tied to the now-repealed statewide map of wildfire risk.
  5. Repeal the “capability test” farm dwelling provisions because the county has not prepared the required gross sales figures. If this work is completed, the provisions can be added back, but currently they create confusion for staff and the public.
  6. Add land division allowances from state law that are not currently in the ZDO.
  7. Correct errors in the approval period and time extension provisions for consistency with state law.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 406, Timber District (TBR)

  1. “Audit” the entire section for consistency with requirements of state law and edit as needed for compliance.
  2. Resolve inconsistency with state regulations by removing the dates that limit the applicability of various siting standards for new structures.
  3. Resolve inconsistency with state regulations by adding a tree stocking requirement as a condition of approval applicable to new dwellings. It appears this provision was inadvertently removed from the ZDO in 2012.
  4. Delete redundant definitions.
  5. Amend notations in Table 406-1, Permitted Uses in the TBR District, to be more consistent with notations in the tables of uses for other zoning districts in the ZDO.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 407, Ag/Forest District (AG/F) 

  1. Remove extensive table of uses and references to certain land use processes and replace with a statement that uses permitted in the AG/F District are those allowed in the EFU District, subject to Section 401, Exclusive Farm Use District (EFU), and those allowed in the TBR District, subject to Section 406, Timber District (TBR), subject to certain limitations. This is not a substantive change, rather is proposed for clarity and to ensure that future code amendments do not inadvertently create inconsistencies between AG/F and EFU and TBR.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 510, Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Community Commercial (C-2), Regional Center Commercial (RCC), Retail Commercial (RTL), Corridor Commercial (CC), General Commercial (c-3), Planned Mixed Use (PMU), Station Community Mixed Use (SCMU), Office Apartment (OA), Office Commercial (OC), and Regional Center Office (RCO) Districts

  1. Allow child care centers as primary use in all commercial zones, pursuant to HB 3109[2021] and HB 3560[2025].
  2. Allow emergency shelter to be sited in all commercial zones, if standards in new Section 848 are met, including specific requirements for the entity that must operate the shelter. May not be sited within regulated hazard areas and allowance will sunset if state homeless population is less than 0.18% of total state population, pursuant to ORS 197.782 – 783.
  3. Allow residential treatment facilities and residential treatment homes as a primary use in all commercial zones, subject to standards in new Section 849, pursuant to HB 2005 [2025].
  4. Allow mental or psychiatric hospitals as a primary use in all commercial zones, only if located adjacent to crisis stabilization center. Allow crisis stabilization center as primary use in all commercial zones use on publicly-owned land, only if located adjacent to a mental or psychiatric hospital. These uses are subject to standards in new Section 849 (HB 2005 [2025]).
  5. Add “single room occupancies” as an allowed dwelling type in all commercial zones that currently allow multifamily dwellings to be consistent with allowances in multifamily residential zones.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 511, Village Community Service District (VCS)

  1. Replace “child care facilities” with “child care centers”
  2. Allow emergency shelter to be sited, if standards in new Section 848 are met, including specific requirements for the entity that must operate the shelter. May not be sited within regulated hazard areas and allowance will sunset if state homeless population is less than 0.18% of total state population, pursuant to ORS 197.782 – 783. 
  3. Allow residential treatment facilities and residential treatment homes as a primary use, subject to standards in new Section 849 , pursuant to HB 2005 [2025].
  4. Allow mental or psychiatric hospitals as a primary use, only if located adjacent to crisis stabilization center. Allow crisis stabilization center as primary use on publicly-owned land, only if located adjacent to a mental or psychiatric hospital. These uses are subject to standards in new Section 849 (HB 2005 [2025]).

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 512, Village Office District (VO)

  1. Allow child care centers as primary use, pursuant to HB 3109[2021] and HB 3560[2025].
  2. Allow emergency shelter to be sited, if standards in new Section 848 are met, including specific requirements for the entity that must operate the shelter. May not be sited within regulated hazard areas and allowance will sunset if state homeless population is less than 0.18% of total state population, pursuant to ORS 197.782 – 783. 
  3. Allow residential treatment facilities and residential treatment homes as a primary use, subject to standards in new Section 849 , pursuant to HB 2005 [2025].
  4. Allow mental or psychiatric hospitals as a primary use, only if located adjacent to crisis stabilization center. Allow crisis stabilization center as primary use on publicly-owned land, only if located adjacent to a mental or psychiatric hospital. These uses are subject to standards in new Section 849 (HB 2005 [2025]).

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 602, Business Park, Light Industrial, and General Industrial Districts (BP, LI and GI)

  1. Allow child care centers as primary use in LI and BP zones, pursuant to HB 3109[2021] and HB 3560[2025].
  2. Allow emergency shelter to be sited in all industrial zones, if standards in new Section 848 are met, including specific requirements for the entity that must operate the shelter. May not be sited within regulated hazard areas and allowance will sunset if state homeless population is less than 0.18% of total state population. (ORS 197.782 – 783) 
  3. Allow residential treatment facilities and residential treatment homes as a primary use in LI and BP zones, subject to standards in new Section 849 (HB 2005 [2025]).
  4. Allow mental or psychiatric hospitals as a primary use in all industrial zones, only if located adjacent to crisis stabilization center. Allow crisis stabilization center as primary use in all industrial zones use on publicly-owned land, only if located adjacent to a mental or psychiatric hospital. These uses are subject to standards in new Section 849 (HB 2005 [2025]).

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 703, Floodplain Management District (FMD)

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 
  2. Correct citation.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 704, River and Stream Conservation Area (RSCA)

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 705, Willamette River Greenway (WRG)

  1. Remove the 35-foot height limit for residential buildings in the High Density Residential (HDR) District.
  2. Add clarification on how to measure dock and boathouse area.
  3. Remove the prohibition on private noncommercial docks and moorages in the Limited Use rural portions of the WRG identified on Comprehensive Plan Map 3-1e, Willamette River Greenway Design Plan.
  4. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 706, Habitat Conservation Area District (HCAD)

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 
  2. Correct citation.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 709, Water Quality Resource Area District (WQRAD)

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 710, Sensitive Bird Habitat District (SBH)

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 712, Private Use Airport and Safety Overlay Zone

  1. Clarify date for establishing current level of activity that may be continued.  
  2. Clarify that procedure for review of other (non-airport related uses) requires a Type II application.
  3. Correct citations and references.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 713, Public Use Airport and Safety Overlay Zone

  1. Clarify date for establishing current level of activity that may be continued. 
  2. Remove definition of “public assembly facility,” a term that is not used anywhere in the ZDO.
  3. Remove redundant reference to the need to comply with the section.
  4. Clarify that procedure for review of other (non-airport related uses) requires a Type II application.
  5. Correct citations and references.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 804, Places of Worship

  1. Update permitted accessory activities in Subsection 804.02(A) to include preschools or prekindergarten education, as required by SB 1099 [2025].

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 806, Home Occupations to Host Events

  1. Clarify which development standards sections from Section 1000 apply to Home Occupations to Host Events.
  2. Eliminate the standards for portable restrooms due to significant confusion for applicants related to how the standard worked with other department’s standards (i.e. Building Code, Septic rules)
  3. Add the requirement to Screening and Buffering section, which provides standards and guidance to use landscaping, fencing, or other techniques to mitigate impacts of dissimilar uses. 
  4. Conforming amendment necessary due to proposed changes to use tables in AG/F, EFU, and TBR Districts.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 837, Mobile Vending Units

  1. Remove off-street motor vehicle parking requirement for locations within urban zoning districts, which includes those regulated by ZDO Sections 315, 510, 511, 512, 602, and 702, to comply with recent changes to OAR 660, Division 12. Off-street motor vehicle parking requirements would remain for other zones in which this use is allowed. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 839, Accessory Dwelling Units

  1. Repeal the fire hardening construction and defensible spaces standards that were tied to the now-repealed statewide map of wildfire risk.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 840, Farmers Markets

  1. Remove off-street motor vehicle parking requirement for locations within urban zoning districts, which includes those regulated by ZDO Sections 315, 510, 511, 512, 602, and 702, to comply with recent changes to OAR 660, Division 12. Off-street motor vehicle parking requirements would remain for other zones in which this use is allowed.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 841, Marijuana Production, Processing, and Retailing

  1. Correct citations to ORS sections and to Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission.  
  2. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension. 

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 845, Triplexes, Quadplexes, Townhouses, and Cottage Clusters

  1.  Exempt townhouse developments with 20 or more units from the building design standards in Section 845.03(C), pursuant to SB 974[2025].

Summary of Proposed Addition of Section 848, Emergency Shelter Siting

  1. Add standards for emergency shelter siting, as required by HB 2026 [2021] and reflected in ORS 197.782 – 783. Standards include specific requirements for operator of emergency shelter, siting requirements and list of services that may be provided. Approval of an emergency shelter siting sunsets if, in the most recent point-in-time count, total sheltered and unsheltered homeless population was less than 0.18 percent of the state population.
  2. Require review of an emergency shelter as a new Type II-S application, as described in Section 1307, Procedures

Summary of Proposed Addition of Section 849, Residential Treatment Facilities, Residential Treatment Homes, Mental or Psychiatric Hospitals, and Crisis Stabilization Centers

  1. Add standards for certain residential treatment facilities, residential treatment homes, mental or psychiatric hospitals, and crisis stabilization centers, as required by HB 2005 [2025].  
  2. Require review of any of these uses as a new Type II-S application, as described in Section 1307, Procedures.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 903, Setback Exceptions

  1. Revise alternative setback options for flag lots to be clear and objective, and to account for flag lots that are not rectilinear.
  2. Remove standards that provided a process for a reduced front setback for alterations to a structure with a lawfully nonconforming front setback. This process is removed as the standards were both duplicative to the nonconforming use process established in ZDO 1206 and potentially imposed a greater restriction on property owners with nonconforming structures than is allowed under ORS 215.130.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1005, Site and Building Design

  1. Fix incorrect citations/references:
    • 1005.05(H) references 1009.04(A)(2) but it is intended to reference 1009.03(A)(2).
    • 1005.09(E) references 1005.10(G) and (L) but it is intended to reference 1005.09(G) and (L).
  2. Remove the prohibition on silos, towers, or other specialized storage structures in the LI zone and include screening requirements.
  3. Add requirement that on-site walkways must connect primary building entrances to accessible parking spaces, to comply with recent changes in ORS 660, Division 12.
  4. Replace “major on site vehicular circulation ways” with “internal streets” to be consistent with proposed new definition of internal streets in Section 202, Definitions.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1009, Landscaping

  1. Include climate mitigation actions and tree canopy requirements for new off-street parking lots that are over one-half acre in size and within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, to comply with recent changes to OAR 660, Division 12.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1010, Signs

  1. Remove references to CI zoning district, which is no longer applied in the county, including a reference to the definition of “site area.” Replace with reference to the same definition found in Section 844, Multi-Use Developments.
  2. Clarify that the standards for signs in Commercial zoning districts apply to all signs in Commercial zoning districts, not just commercial signs.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1015, Parking and Loading

  1. Remove off-street motor vehicle parking requirement for locations within urban zoning districts, which includes those regulated by ZDO Sections 315, 510, 511, 512, 602, and 702, to comply with recent changes to OAR 660, Division 12.
  2. Amend standards currently tied to the minimum number of required spaces to apply to the number of provided spaces, if no minimum number of spaces are required.
  3. Amend maximum off-street parking requirements for certain uses within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary to comply with to OAR 660, Division 12, while maintaining compliance with Metro’s Regional Transportation Functional Plan. Where the two standards conflicted, the more restrictive standard was applied. Amendments includes a new definition of “Urban Zone A” to incorporate requirements of OAR 660, Division 12.
  4. Replace “major on site circulation drive aisles” with “internal streets” for consistency and to reflect with proposed new definition of internal streets in Section 202, Definitions.
  5. Includes conforming amendments.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1102, Design Review

  1. Require design review for institutional uses in any zoning district. Institutional uses are subject to the development standards in Section 1000, but it is not currently clear is some zoning districts process is required for review of a proposed development against those standards.
  2. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1103, Open Space Review

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1105, Subdivisions, Partitions, Replats, Middle Housing Land Divisions, Condominium Plats, and Vacations of Recorded Plats

  1. Adopt new standards and submittal requirements for Expedited Land Divisions, pursuant to Section 19 of House Bill 2138 [2025].
  2. Adopt amended standards for Middle Housing Land Divisions, pursuant to Section 14 of HB 2138 [2025].
  3. Minor renumbering housekeeping amendments resulting from new section created for (1) and other citation corrections.
  4. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1107, Property Line Adjustments

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1203, Conditional Uses

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1205, Variances

  1. Change approval period to six years with no option for a time extension, instead of the current four years plus an optional two-year time extension.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1206, Nonconforming Uses and Vested Rights

  1. Removes two Oxford commas to align ZDO 1206.05(A) and (B) with ORS 215.130(10)(a) and (11).
  2. Removes option for time extension for approval period, which was inconsistent with the allowed discontinuance period of a nonconforming use.

Summary of Proposed Amendments to Section 1307, Procedures

  1. Adopt changes to the review procedures for Type II-E land use applications (applicable to expedited land divisions and middle housing land divisions) to align with changes adopted per House Bill 2138 [2025].
  2. Remove time extension, subject to Section 1310 (which is proposed for repeal) from Table 1307-1, Land Use Permits by Procedure Type.
  3. Allow for one property owner or each taxlot within a subject property to sign to authorize a land use application. This change will enable the county to begin processing land use applications through an online portal.
  4. Amend time period a Type I application can be made complete from 60 to 180 days, to be consistent with Type II and III land use applications.
  5. Remove limitations on refiling an application, which requires staff to make a determination about whether the application is “substantially similar” to the previous application.
  6. Remove reference to criteria listed in refiling section proposed for removal. Allow modifications to conditions of approval if they meet the criteria in Section 1309, Modifications, rather than meeting the limited circumstances currently referenced.
  7. Add two new land use application types and procedures:
    1. Type I-H, for certain housing applications utilizing only clear & objective standards for review, pursuant to Section 17, HB 4037[2026].
    2. Type II-S, for specific use applications that are required by state law to have different procedural aspects, including in some case limited notice of application and limited appeal rights. The applications follow the Type II procedures and processes except where specifically noted in this section. Type II-S applications include the new “urban housing application” required pursuant to ORS 197A.146.

Proposed Repeal of Section 1310, Time Extension

  1. Section proposed for repeal because implementation creates an unnecessary burden on both applicants and Planning staff. Two-year time extensions are rarely denied, unless standards have changed during the original approval period (typically four years). Rather than require an additional fee and application, that takes a substantial amount of time for staff to review, the proposal is to eliminate the two-year time extensions for most land use approvals in most zoning districts and allow two additional years for the original approval.
  2. All Sections of the ZDO that currently have a four-year approval period plus an optional two-year time extension are proposed to change to a six-year approval period with no option for a time extension.
  3. Exceptions are the AG/F, EFU, and TBR Districts, in which approval periods and time extensions for certain uses are specified in state law. Amendments are proposed for these sections to ensure approval period and time extension provisions are consist with state law.
Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Figures 5-1 a-e Urban Cross Sections

Figure 5 – 1a: Typical Urban Major Arterial Cross Section

Notes:

  1. For more detailed information on the implementation of this Cross Section – see the Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or the County Roadway Standards.
  2. Cross section may vary to accommodate Metro's Regional Transportation Functional Plan 3.08.110 Street System Design, to accommodate design modifications in compliance with the County Roadway Standards, or where a special transportation plan in Chapter 5 specifies a different cross section.
  3. Medians, pedestrian refuges, islands, curb extensions, turn lanes, and drainage facilities shall be provided as needed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the 5-year Transportation Capital Improvement Program, or as warranted by the County Roadway Standards and will vary the required constructed and right-of-way width.
  4. Bikeway facilities shall be based on the guidelines found in 5.2 of the Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan except as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the 5-year Capital Improvement program.

Figure 5 – 1b: Typical Urban Minor Arterial Cross Section

Notes:

  1. For more detailed information on the implementation of this Cross Section – see the Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or the County Roadway Standards.
  2. Cross section may vary to accommodate Metro's Regional Transportation Functional Plan 3.08.110 Street System Design, to accommodate design modifications in compliance with the County Roadway Standards, or where a special transportation plan in Chapter 5 specifies a different cross section.
  3. Medians, pedestrian refuges, islands, curb extensions, turn lanes, and drainage facilities shall be provided as needed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the 5-year Transportation Capital Improvement Program, or as warranted by the County Roadway Standards and will vary the required constructed and right-of-way width.
  4. Bikeway facilities shall be based on the guidelines found in 5.2 of the Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan except as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the 5-year Capital Improvement program.

Figure 5 – 1c: Typical Urban Collector Cross Section

Notes:

  1. For more detailed information on the implementation of this Cross Section – see the Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or the County Roadway Standards.
  2. Cross section may vary to accommodate Metro's Regional Transportation Functional Plan 3.08.110 Street System Design, to accommodate design modifications in
  3. compliance with the County Roadway Standards, or where a special transportation plan in Chapter 5 specifies a different cross section.
  4. Medians, pedestrian refuges, islands, curb extensions, turn lanes, and drainage facilities shall be provided as needed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the 5-year Transportation Capital Improvement Program, or as warranted by the County Roadway Standards and will vary the required constructed and right-of-way width.
  5. Bikeway facilities shall be based on the guidelines found in 5.2 of the Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan except as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the 5-year Capital Improvement program.

Figure 5 – 1d: Typical Urban Connector/Local Cross Section

Notes:

  1. For more detailed information on the implementation of this Cross Section – see the Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or the County Roadway Standards.
  2. Cross section may vary to accommodate Metro's Regional Transportation Functional Plan 3.08.110 Street System Design, to accommodate design modifications incompliance with the County Roadway Standards, or where a special transportation plan in Chapter 5 specifies a different cross section.
  3. Curb extensions, turn lanes, and drainage facilities shall be provided as needed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, the 5-year Transportation Capital Improvement Program, or as warranted by the County Roadway Standards and will vary the required constructed and right-of-way width.
  4. Standard configuration is parking on both sides, which may be reduced to one side of the street (resulting in a paved width of 26' with a design exception per the Roadway Standards.
  5. Local Streets Only: Under no circumstances will the paved width be less than 20' (two 10' travel lanes with no parking).

Figure 5 – 1e: Typical Urban Alley Cross Section

Notes:

  • This standard cross section shall apply except where a Special Transportation plan in Chapter 5 specifies a different cross section.
  • For more detailed information on the implementation of this Cross Section – see the Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or County Roadway Standards.
  • Cross section may vary to accommodate Metro Regional Transportation Functional Plan 3.08.110 Street System Design or to accommodate topographical or environmental constraints.

Last Amended November 27, 2018

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Appendix B: Summary of Supporting Documents

Citizen Involvement

  • Citizen and Agency Involvement Program
  • Clackamas County Citizen Involvement Program.  Comprehensive Plan 
    Chapter 2
  • Committee for Citizen Involvement Bylaws
  • Committee for Citizen Involvement Roster
  • Community Planning Organization Leaders.  Lists and maps of CPO areas.

Natural Resources and Energy

Clackamas County Energy Project Publications, 1983:

  • An Energy Anthology
  • Clackamas County Energy Use and Supply Background Data
  • Clackamas County Energy Management Plan
  • Technical Memorandum, Energy Emergency Planning
  • Technical Memorandum, County Buildings
  • Technical Memorandum, County Motor Fleet
  • Technical Memorandum, County Organization

Clackamas County Resources Atlas, Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division.  Includes maps of the following:

  • General Resources
  • Agricultural Land Types and Major Production Areas
  • Forest Zones and Vegetative Types
  • Cubic Foot Forest Site Classes
  • Forest Ownerships
  • Urban Forest Cover
  • Detailed SCS Soil Mapping Index
  • Unique National and Scenic Features
  • Open Urban Land Inventory
  • Park and Recreation Facilities;  Historic and Cultural Sites
  • Fisheries and Wildlife Habitats
  • Aggregate Sites
  • Groundwater Studies Index
  • Geologic Hazards, Northwest Clackamas County
  • River Corridors, Existing Conditions and Management Strategies
  • Precipitation and Physiography

Draft Third Biennial Energy Plan, Action Plan and Recommendations, Oregon Department of Energy, October 1988.

Environmental Geology of the Kellogg Creek-Mt. Scott Creek and Lower Clackamas River Drainage Areas, Northwestern Clackamas County, Oregon, M.S. Thesis, Matthew John Brunego, March, 1978.

Federal Land Resource/Management Plans - Mt. Hood National Forest, Draft EIS, U.S. Forest Service, 1988; and Eastside Salem District Planning Area Land Use Plan (Clackamas Unit), Bureau of Land Management, 1982.

Fish and Wildlife Habitat Protection Plan for Clackamas County, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 1979.

Geologic Hazards of the Bull Run Watershed, Multnomah and Clackamas Counties, Oregon, Oregon Bulletin 82.  Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 1974.

Geology and Geologic Hazards of Northwestern Clackamas County, Oregon Bulletin 99, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 1979.

Geology and Ground Water of the Molalla-Salem Slope Area, Northern Willamette Valley, Oregon, U.S. Geological Survey, 1967.

Ground Water Resources in the French Prairie Area, Northern Willamette Valley, Oregon, U.S. Geological Survey, 1967.

Ground Water Resources in the East Portland Area, Oregon, U.S. Geological Survey, 1965.

Lakes of the Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Forest Service, N.D.

National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Individual Quad Maps Covering Clackamas County, 1981 to date.

1980 Major Water Tables Aquifers Map, supplied by Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality, N.D.

1984 Census of Agriculture, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Vol. 1, part 36.

Oregon Air Quality, 1988 Annual Report, Dept. of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Control Division, Portland, Oregon.

Oregon Natural Areas Clackamas County, Oregon, Natural Heritage Program, the Nature Conservancy, 1977.

Oregon Nongame Wildlife Management Plan (Revised Draft), Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, June, 1984.

Oregon Outdoor Recreation "SCORP '83", State Parks and Recreation, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, 1983.

Oregon's Statewide Assessment of Nonpoint Source Problems, Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality, 1978.

Planning Background Report, Energy; Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division.

Planning Background Report, Natural Hazards; Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division.

Planning Background Report, Natural Resources; Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division.

Planning Background Report, Rivers; Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division.

Preliminary Willamette River Greenway, Royston, Hanamoto, Beck and Abey, 1974.

Regional Urban Wildlife Habitat Maps, U.S. Army Engineer District Portland Corps of Engineers, 1978.

Review of Land, Water, Air Quality and Noise Control, 1980-88, Clackamas County Planning and Economic Development Division, 1988.

Rock Material Resources of Clackamas, Columbia, Multnomah and Washington Counties, Oregon, Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries, 1978.

State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan, Technical Documents I, II, and III;  ODOT, Parks and Recreation Branch.

Timber for Oregon's Tomorrow, Oregon State University School of Forestry, Beuter, John H.; Johnson, K. Norman; Scheurman, H. Lynn; Research Bulletin 19, January 1976.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service, "Timber Resource Statistics for Northwest Oregon," Basset, Patricia M.; preliminary copies of unpublished report, 1979.

Water Resources Data for Oregon 1976, 1977, U.S. Geological Survey.

Well Hydrographs Clackamas County, Oregon, Oregon Water Resources Dept., unpublished.

Wilderness Management Plan for the Table Rock Wilderness (Draft), U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, 1986.

Willamette Greenway Plan, Bureau of Planning, Portland, Oregon, November, 1987.

The Willamette River Greenway, Oregon State Parks and Recreation Branch, Dept. of Transportation.

Land Use

Comprehensive Plan, Clackamas County, Oregon, Planning Dept., Clackamas County, August, 1974.

Comprehensive Plan, Clackamas County, Oregon, Planning Dept., Clackamas County, June, 1980.

Comprehensive Plan Update, The Sunnyside United Neighbors, June 30, 1988, Revised August 22, 1988.

Comprehensive Plan, Clackamas County, Oregon, Planning Dept., Clackamas County, June 1992.

Let's Build A Revised Comprehensive Plan for Clackamas County, Dept. of Environmental Services, Clackamas County, January, 1979.

Sunrise Center Task Force, Clackamas County, December, 1987.

City of Sandy Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Analysis – Final Report, City of Sandy
Planning Department, February 2017.

City of Sandy Urbanization Study – Final Report, City of Sandy Planning Department,
January 2015.

Transportation

5 Year Transportation Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 1996-2000, Clackamas County, July, 1996.

Capital Improvement Plan, 5-Year Capital Improvement Program, FY 1998/99 to 2002/03, 20-Year Long Range Transportation Plan, 1998 to 2008, December 1998.

Getting There by Bike, Metropolitan Services District, Metro, 1988.

Handbook for Environmental Quality Elements of Land Use Plans, Air Quality, Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality, 1978.

I-5/Canby/Highway 213 Access Improvement Study, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, 1987.

Oregon Action Plan for Transportation, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, 1989.

Planning Background Report: Transportation, Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division, 1979.

Planning With Transit, Tri-Met, 1979.

Public-Private Task Force on Transit Finance, Policy Report, Barney and Worth, Inc., 1988.

Regional Bicycle Plan, Metropolitan Service District, August 1983.

Regional Transportation Plan, Metropolitan Service District, 1989.

Six-Year Highway Improvement Program 1989-1994, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, 1988.

State of Oregon Bicycle Master Plan, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Highway Division, March 15, 1988.

Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Oregon Department of Transportation, Highway Division, June 14, 1995.

Sunnyside I-205 Split Diamond Interchange, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, 1988.

Sunnyside Road, (I-205 to SE 172nd Avenue) Environmental Assessment. Clackamas County, August 21, 1998.

Sunrise Corridor Reconnaissance Study, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, Highway Division, Region 1, 1987.

A Systems Analysis of Major Regional Transportation Corridors, MSD, 1979.

Transportation Involvement Program, Metropolitan Service District, 1987.

Transportation Plan Background Document, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, September 2013.

Clackamas County Transportation Safety Action Plan, Kittelson & Associates, July 2013.

Clackamas County ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) Action Plan, DKS Associates, May 2011.

Tri-Met Five-Year Transit Development Plan, Tri-Met, 1987.

SE 172nd Avenue/ SE190th Drive Corridor Management Plan, Appendix A - Environmental Baseline Report, MB&G, Inc., September 20, 2011

SE 172nd Avenue/ SE190th Drive Corridor Management Plan, Appendix B – Analysis of Preferred Alternative

SE 172nd Avenue/ SE190th Drive Corridor Management Plan, Appendix C – 
15% Design Plans, Alignment Alternative AT2, Clackamas County, 
October 24, 2011

SE 172nd Avenue/ SE190th Drive Corridor Management Plan, Appendix E – Corridor Centerline Survey, November 10, 2011

Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan, Appendices A through F

Damascus Mobility Plan, Kittleson & Associates, Inc., July 27, 2022

Walk Bike Clackamas Plan, Appendices A through T

Housing

A Report to the Board of County Commissioners, Housing Affordability and Homelessness Task Force, December, 2019.

Background Report for the Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan Update 1989, Goal 10 - Housing, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Economic Development Section, 1989.

Clackamas County Regional Housing Need Analysis, EcoNorthwest, September, 2019.
Exploring the Factors that Drive Displacement Risk in Unincoprorated Clackamas County: With a Special Look at Manufactured Housing Communities, EcoNorthwest, September, 2019.
Long-Range Planning Issue Paper #2020-1:  Housing Strategies Related to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning and Development Ordinance Updates, Planning and Zoning Division, Clackamas County, February, 2020.

Plan for Community Development, Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division, 1979.

Public Facilities and Services

Clackamas County School Directory 1988-1989, Education Service District, 1988.

CRAG 208 Areawide Wastewater Treatment Management Study, (Volumes 1 and 2, including technical supplements), CRAG, 1977.

DEQ Coordination Program Approved by LCDC, Dept. of Environmental Quality, 1978.

Draft Plan for Community Development - Clackamas County, Clackamas County, January, 1979.

Draft Regional Water Supply Plan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1979.

Drainage Management Flood Damage Reduction Measures, Kramer, Chin and Mayo, 1978.

Drainage Management Planning Manual, Review Draft, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, March, 1979.

Drainage Study for the City of Milwaukie, Oregon, Stevens, Thompson and Runyan, 1970.

Drainage Study of the Oak Lodge Area, Clackamas County, Stevens, Thompson and Runyan, 1970.

Guide to Water and Sewer Systems, CRAG, 1976.

Interim Guidelines for Storm Water Run-off Management in the Johnson Creek Basin, MSD, 1979.

Inventory of Existing Water Supply Systems for Major Outlying Communities, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1978.

Kellogg Creek Storm Drainage, Clackamas County, CH2M, 1970.

Master Plan Report, Clackamas Community College, 1977 (revised).

North Clackamas Urban Area Public Facilities Plan, Sanitary Sewerage Services, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning and Economic Development Division, January 1989.

North Clackamas Urban Area Public Facilities Plan, Storm Drainage Element, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning and Economic Development Division, February, 1989.

North Clackamas Urban Area Public Facilities Plan, Transportation Element, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning and Economic Development Division, November, 1988.

North Clackamas Urban Area Public Facilities Plan, Water Systems, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning and Economic Development Division, February, 1989, as amended on September 3, 1992, by Board Order 92-931.

Sewerage Facilities Plan and Study Treatment and Disposal Element--Tri-City Area, Clackamas County, CH2M-Hill, 1978.

Sewerage Facilities Plan for Mt. Hood Recreational Corridor, Stevens, Thompson and Runyan, 1977.

Solid Waste and Waste Management Ordinance, Clackamas County, 1970, Amended 1973, 1975, 1985, and 1989.

Solid Waste Landfill Study, Clackamas County, CH2M-Hill, 1971.

Statement of Taxes Levied in Clackamas County, Clackamas County Assessor, 1988.

Storm Sewer and Drainage Study of the Lake Oswego Area, CH2M, 1968.

Subdivision Manual, Clackamas County, 1975.

Water and Sewerage for Non-Urban Clackamas County, Clackamas County, 1970 (Vol. 1 and 2).

Economics

Background Report for the Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan Update 1989, Goal 9 - Economy of the State, Dept. of Transportation and Development, Economic Development Section, 1989.

Economic Development Plan, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, 1986.

Tourism Background Report with Appendices, Clackamas County, Dept. of Transportation and Development, August, 1985.

Open Space, Parks, and Historic Sites

Clackamas County Cultural Resources Inventory, Volumes I through XV, Clackamas County, 1984 and 1986.

Clackamas County Historic Landmarks, Unincorporated Urban Area, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, June, 1988.

Clackamas County Household Survey, 1978; Portland State University, CPRC.

Maps of the Barlow Road, Mt. Hood to Oregon City, Clackamas County, Oregon, Clackamas County Planning and Economic Development Division, November, 1988.

Metropolitan Area Parks, Metropolitan Service District, 1989.

Metropolitan Regional Recreation Resources 1995 and 2010, Metro, 1988.

Oregon Recreation Trails, State Parks and Recreation, Oregon Dept. of Transportation, 1979.

Our Oregon Trail, A Report to the Governor, Oregon Trail Advisory Council, 1988.

Parks and Recreation for the East Urban Area, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning and economic Development Division, 1989.

Plan for Community Development, Clackamas County, Clackamas County Dept. of Environmental Services, Planning Division.

Recreation Economic Decisions, Richard J. Walsh, Colorado State University, 1986.

Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, National Recreation and Park Association, 1987.

Regional Factbook, Demographic, Employment and Land Development Trends - Portland and Metropolitan Area, Metro, 1988.

State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan, Technical Documents I, II, and III;  ODOT, Parks and Recreation Branch.

Strategies for Parks and Recreation, Clackamas County, Technical Memorandum, 1981.

Trails for Oregon, A Plan for a Recreation Trails System; ODOT, Parks and Recreation Branch.

The 2010 Plan, State Parks and Recreation, ODOT, 1988.

The Urban Outdoors, Metropolitan Service District.

Community Plans and Design Plans

Clackamas Industrial Area and North Bank of the Clackamas River Design Plan, Clackamas County Planning Department, February 13, 1997.

Clackamas Regional Center Transportation System Plan, Kittelson & Associates, Inc., January, 1999.

Kruse Way Design Plan, Clackamas County Department of Environmental Services, October, 1983.

McLoughlin Corridor Land Use and Transportation Study, Final Report, Clackamas County, June, 1999.

Mount Hood Community Plan, Clackamas County Planning Department, July, 1982.

Sunnyside Corridor Community Plan, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning Division, June, 2000.

Sunnyside Village Plan, Clackamas County Dept. of Transportation and Development, Planning Division, July, 1996.

Villages at Mt. Hood Pedestrian and Bikeway Implementation Plan, June 2016

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Appendix A: Maps and Documents Adopted by Reference

The following maps and documents have been adopted by reference to the Comprehensive Plan.  These documents are available for review at the Clackamas County Planning and Zoning Division. 

Natural Resources and Energy

  • Habitat Conservation Area Maps [Added by Order 2008-197, 1/5/2009; Added by Ordinance ZDO-256, 7/18/2016]
  • Water Quality Resource Area Maps [Added by Order 2008-197, 1/5/2009; Added by Ordinance ZDO-256, 7/18/2016]
  • Board Order 2014-14 (In the Matter of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zone Map Amendment, and Site Plan Review request from Tonquin Holdings, LLC, on property described as T3S R1W Section 04A, Tax Lots 100 and 102) and All Attachments [Added by Order 2014-14, 2/27/2014]
  • Board Order 2020-16 (In the Matter of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zone Map Amendment, and Site Plan Review request from Cadman Materials, Inc. on property described as T4S R1E Section 07, Tax Lots 500, 600, 700, 800, 801, 1002, 1003 & 1004) and all Attachments [Added by Order 2020-16, 3/12/2020]

Transportation

  • Walk Bike Clackamas Plan [Added by Ordinance ZDO-292, 7/17/2025]
  • Clackamas County Airport Plan [Added by Order 01-256, 11/1/2001]
  • SE 172nd Avenue/190th Drive Corridor Management Plan, February 2012, Revised January 2018 [Added by Ordinance ZDO-232, 3/12/2012; Amended by Ordinance ZDO-255, 7/14/2016; Amended by Ordinance ZDO-270, 11/27/2018]
  • Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan, June 1, 2015 [Added by Ordinance ZDO-251, 6/1/2015]

Community Plans and Design Plans, Clackamas Regional Center Area Design Plan

  • Phillips Creek Greenway Framework Plan [Added by Order 98-308, 12/23/1998]
  • Clackamas Regional Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Plan [Added by Ordinance ZDO-238, 10/15/2012]

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3: Natural Resources and Energy

Citizen involvement is essential in the governmental process to promote the general health and welfare of the total community. New approaches must be developed by local government to effectively involve citizens in the planning and decision-making process. Positive accomplishments can be achieved.

The resources and natural systems of Clackamas County are the most enduring and tangible assets for its communities and their economies and environment.

River corridors, farm fields, marshes, scenic outlooks, wildflowers, spawning beds for salmon, deer and elk wintering areas, gravel quarries, magnificent stands of trees along Oatfield Ridge, or reservoirs of hot water beneath the slopes of Mt. Hood are all part of the wealth of Clackamas County's environment.

Natural resources and processes are interdependent, supplying benefits to the system of which they are a part. Plants are used by animals. Floodplains accommodate floods. Geologic processes produce areas of spectacular scenery. Skiers use the snow-covered slopes of Multorpor Mountain. Favorable soils and slopes result in savings for construction. Energy flows into the region from the sun, wind, and rain.

Clackamas County is an area of rapid growth, urbanization pressures, and diverse rural activities. As man exerts a greater influence on the environment, planning for future use of Clackamas County's land, water, and energy resources becomes increasingly important. The concern becomes one of insuring long-range values and a high quality of life. This can be accomplished by insuring that our resources are wisely managed, that different uses of land do not conflict, that energy for productivity is available in the quantities needed, and that there is a sufficient amount of high-quality water for the needs of the population as well as natural systems.

Issues

  • Use of rivers for recreation and public water supply.
  • Effects of river corridor development.
  • Competing land use demands in river corridors and impact of development on wetlands.
  • Availability and quality of groundwater.
  • Management of agricultural resources.
  • Management of forest resources on small woodlot ownerships.
  • Management of urban forests.
  • Competition of recreational demands in forest areas.
  • Management of mineral and aggregate supplies.
  • Reuse of exhausted aggregate extraction sites.
  • Management of fish and wildlife habitat.
  • Compatibility of structures and land uses in critical habitat areas; animal damage in agricultural/forest areas.
  • Protection of scenic and unique natural areas on public and private lands.
  • Housing density in hazard areas (e.g., steep slopes, active landslides, and floodplains).
  • Government liability if known hazard areas are allowed to develop, and damage to life or property occurs.
  • Energy efficiency and alternative local sources (e.g., solar, geothermal).
  • Need for educational programs on energy conservation (e.g., weatherization, recycling, and efficient land use patterning).

Summary of Findings and Conclusions

On peak days and/or during summer months, sections of the Willamette River are overused in terms of recreational activities. The Clackamas and Sandy Rivers may be approaching recreational overuse in some sections. The Molalla has very low summer flows. Access points on the Tualatin River and lower Molalla River are few. The banks of the Tualatin are predominantly mud, relatively fragile, and cannot withstand much wave (wake) action. Regulatory programs include State Scenic Waterways on the Clackamas and Sandy Rivers, Federal Wild and Scenic Waterways Act, the Willamette River Greenway, state water quality standards, Water Resources Department policy and water rights, and Division of State Lands fill permits. Seven cities and the County share jurisdiction of the Willamette River.

  • All rivers either support or provide passage for anadromous fish, i.e. salmon and steelhead.
  • Existing land uses within each river corridor area are:

Land Use as Percentage of Total

RiverResidentialCommercialIndustrialAg/Forest/OS
Clackamas6.50.13.290.2
Sandy4.70.40.094.9
Molalla2.00.01.097.0
Tualatin13.90.20.085.9
Willamette11.30.43.684.7
  • Quality of groundwater in Clackamas County is generally good, although some dissolved iron is found in well supplies. Groundwater monitoring activities show a gradual yearly decline in the water table; however, according to the Oregon Water Resources Department, there is no indication of a critical groundwater situation.
  • The County's agricultural production in 1987 had an estimated value of over $150 million. This contributed a total of approximately $500 million to the state's economy. The County's agricultural land base has decreased over 100,000 acres in the last 30 years. The potential for agricultural production is further reduced by rural parcelization patterns and inactive farm land owners.
  • Techniques for maintaining the County's agricultural base are (1) regulating land uses to insure that in prime agricultural lands, economic farm units are preserved; and (2) utilizing and expanding existing resources that provide tax relief, educational programs, technical assistance, cooperatives, etc., to encourage the economic viability of the County's farms.
  • Federal timber revenues to the County treasury averaged over $9 million per year from 1984 to 1988. The forest industry is one of the largest industries in the state.
  • During the late 1980s (from 1984 to 1988) federal lands supplied 70 to 75 percent of Clackamas County's timber harvest volume, and the forest industry supplied about 15 to 20 percent. Small woodlot owners control approximately 20 percent of the Countywide commercial forest land, and supply 5 to 10 percent of the timber harvest.
  • Inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, street trees are required in certain areas and encouraged elsewhere.
  • Inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, preservation, maintenance, and enhancement of the tree canopy are required or encouraged through regulation and public education.
  • The County could simplify management of its scattered forest holdings by exchanging them for forest lands in other parts of the County and using them for parks and/or open space. A County forest land inventory and management plan has been completed and is now being implemented.
  • Aggregate supplies are integral to general economic development in the County; however, supplies near the urban area are limited due to encroachment of urban land uses.
  • Fishing is a major recreational activity in the County, with many streams and rivers noted for their salmon and steelhead runs. Hunting is also a major activity, with deer, bear, elk, and other hunting having an important economic impact on Clackamas County.
  • Areas near rivers or streams are the most important wildlife habitat, harbor the greatest species diversity, and are critical to the survival of numerous species. Cool and well-oxygenated rivers sustain fish in the summer. Winter range is necessary to support big game during inclement months.
  • Scenic and natural areas are often quite fragile and easily obscured or degraded by inappropriate forms of development.
  • County population projections indicate an increase of 45 percent by the year 2010, substantially increasing development pressure and recreational use of the County's scenic and natural areas. The quality of these resources affects tourism, a major County industry.
  • Flooding and landslides are natural events posing hazards to existing structures and may be compounded by further development. There are approximately 330 acres of landslides and 935 acres of floodplain in northwest unincorporated urban Clackamas County.
  • Inappropriate hillside development can increase runoff, erosion, and public service costs. County road maintenance costs, for development on hillsides with greater than 15 percent slope, are about four times as great as maintenance costs for development on 0 percent to 8 percent slope.
  • Practically all energy is imported to the County. Although little can be done to affect price or supply, efficient use of energy can be accomplished once it enters the County, and auxiliary sources (e.g. solar, wind, geothermal, etc.) can be developed.
  • Nearly 40 percent of the County's energy consumption is wasted by inefficient insulation, improper ventilation, poorly designed appliances, etc. Energy loss due to inefficient land use patterns add to this total. Energy conservation strengthens the economy by preventing job loss during shortages, reducing demands on natural resources, and providing time to develop new or more efficient sources.
  • Solar and wind energy are both essentially unlimited in their supply and pose few environmental problems. If more actively promoted, they could become important auxiliary energy sources in Clackamas County. Solar energy can make an immediate contribution for heating and cooling individual buildings.
  • The Metropolitan Service District has established a solid waste transfer station and recycling center in Oregon City. It, and a similar station near Sandy, are collection points for solid waste before the nonrecycled material is trucked to the landfill.
  • Initial exploration near Mt. Hood indicates a potential for geothermal energy. Heat from the earth could be an important contributor to the total energy requirements of the Portland metropolitan area in the next 10 to 20 years.

Water Resources

The value of Clackamas County's water resources is immeasurable. Rivers, lakes, farm ponds, marshes, streams, and groundwater provide for domestic supply, recreation, wildlife habitat, drainage control, and many aesthetic benefits.

To protect our water resources, the following goals and policies address rivers and stream corridors in general, five individual river corridors, wetlands, and groundwater.

Water Resources Goals

  • Maintain an adequate amount of surface water and maintain and improve water quality to insure its continued use for domestic water supply, aquatic habitat, and recreation.
  • Minimize erosion and hazards to life or private and public property.
  • Maintain or improve the quality and quantity of groundwater.
  • Maintain or improve the quality of rivers and streams.
  • Protect and enhance wetlands as a valuable source of groundwater recharge, wildlife habitat, and stormwater drainage control.

3.A River and Stream Corridors Policies

3.A.1 Maintain rivers and streams in their natural state to the maximum practicable extent through sound water and land management practices. Consideration shall be given to natural, scenic, historic, economic, cultural, and recreational qualities of the rivers and adjacent lands.

3.A.2 Apply erosion and sediment reduction practices in all river basins to assist in maintaining water quality. Existing riparian vegetation along streams and river banks should be retained to provide fisheries and wildlife habitat, minimize erosion and scouring, retard water velocities, and suppress water temperatures.

3.A.3 For areas that are outside both the Metropolitan Service District Boundary and the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, require preservation of a buffer or filter strip of natural vegetation along all river and stream banks as shown on the adopted Water Protection Rules Classification (WPRC) Maps. The depth of the buffer or filter strip will be dependent on the proposed use or development, width of river or stream, steepness of terrain, type of soil, existing vegetation, and other contributing factors, but will not exceed 150 feet. River and stream corridor crossings shall be permitted provided they do not interfere with fish movement. Commercial forest activities and harvesting practices shall provide for vegetation buffers and the intended shading, soil stabilizing, and water filtering effects as required by the Oregon Forest Practices Act and administered by the State Department of Forestry. Tree cutting activities associated with river or stream enhancement projects approved by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife are exempt from this policy.

3.A.4 For areas that are inside either the Metropolitan Service District Boundary or the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, require preservation of a buffer or filter strip of natural vegetation along all river and stream banks as shown on the adopted Habitat Conservation Areas Map and Water Quality Resource Areas Map and for unmapped Water Quality Resource Areas.

3.A.5 Encourage establishment and maintenance of adequate minimum flow standards in all streams to insure a productive fish habitat and to protect aquatic life and scenic qualities. As new data become available, and the Department of Water Resources Commission establishes minimum stream flows, such information shall be incorporated into the County planning process.

3.A.6 Require to the most reasonable extent possible the use of nonstructural methods of bank stabilization in areas experiencing accelerated soil loss. Require that bank stabilization not degrade fish habitat and not accelerate erosion in other sections of the river or stream.

3.A.7 Allow diversion or impoundment of stream courses if fisheries, wildlife, water quality, and flow will not be adversely affected. If the action is taken for fish or wildlife habitat enhancement, the action shall be approved by the applicable federal, state or local agencies having jurisdiction.

3.A.7.1 Require new dams or other impoundments, or major modifications to existing dams or impoundments, to demonstrate that anadromous and resident fish will not be adversely affected by the installation of such works. The methodology for such determination shall be developed by the County in conjunction with affected federal and state agencies, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and Environmental Quality Commission, and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

3.A.7.2 Require all new dam and impoundment projects to incorporate designs which assist to the maximum extent practicable the restoration, expansion and monitoring of anadromous fish populations, as determined by the County in the development of a methodology with the agencies listed in Policy 3.A.7.1 above.

3.A.8 Allow low head hydroelectric dam facilities that do not adversely impact fisheries and water quality.

3.A.8.1 Require new dams or other impoundments, or major modifications to existing dams or other existing impoundments, to demonstrate pursuant to current accepted methodology that anadromous and resident fish will not be adversely impacted as determined by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

3.A.8.2 Require all new dam and impoundment construction incorporate designs which assist to the maximum extent practical restoration, expansion and monitoring of anadromous fish populations as determined by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services.

3.A.9 Decisions regarding developments in Principal River Conservation Areas, Stream Conservation Areas, and Habitat Conservation Areas shall be consistent with the applicable Economic, Social, Environmental and Energy (ESEE) analyses for the watershed.

3.A.10 Establish water-based recreational areas for activities such as swimming, fishing, and canoeing that are free from conflicts with speed boating and water skiing.

3.B Principal River Conservation Area Policies

3.B.1 Designate a Principal River Conservation Area along the corridor of the Willamette River. For areas that are outside both the Metropolitan Service District Boundary and the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, designate Principal River Conservation Areas along the corridors of the Clackamas River, Sandy/Salmon Rivers, Molalla/Pudding Rivers, Tualatin River, Roaring River, and Zig Zag River as shown on Map 3-2. The corridors include those rivers identified by the Omnibus Oregon Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (1988), and the State Scenic Rivers Program. The corridor width will be one-quarter mile from mean high water level on each side, except along the Willamette River, where the width is defined by the Willamette River Greenway boundaries, urban and rural.

3.B.1.1 Coordinate with regional, state and federal regulatory agencies to provide a common management direction and permit review procedures for the designated river corridors. This includes reliance on the Oregon Forest Practices Act for contemplated forest management activities.

3.B.1.2 Manage development in all Principal River Conservation Areas according to the following siting performance criteria:

3.B.1.2.a Maintain vegetative fringe areas along the river free of structures, grading and tree cutting activities (see Policy 3.A.3). Diseased trees or those in danger of falling may be removed.

3.B.1.2.b Minimize erosion and sedimentation through drainage control techniques, revegetation of cleared/disturbed areas, phasing of vegetation removal, closure of unused roads, and discouraging off-road vehicles.

3.B.1.2.c Limit residential structure height to 35 feet and use a vegetative fringe to screen from the river primary and accessory structures.

3.B.1.2.d Encourage subdued substructure color or tones to blend with surroundings and adjacent features.

3.B.1.2.e Screen commercial/industrial structures (except water-dependent or water-related uses), parking and/or loading, and storage areas from view from the river, and orient signs away from the river.

3.B.1.3 Require a minimum setback of not less than 100 feet or more than 150 feet from mean high water level for all structures, except water-dependent uses. The actual setback shall be based on the site criteria stipulated in Policy 3.A.3. Residential lots of record and residential minor land partitions unable to meet this requirement shall be exempt from the minimum setback standard. However, all River Areas siting criteria and other provisions of this Plan shall be met. Requirements of the State Scenic Waterways Act and Willamette River Greenway must be met on the applicable reaches of the Clackamas, Sandy, and Willamette Rivers.

3.B.1.4 Encourage new public access points to minimize trespass and vandalism on private property.

3.B.1.5 Mining of aggregate within Principal River Conservation Areas shall only be allowed upon demonstration the site is significant, has been reviewed pursuant to the Goal 5 process and procedures, and when demonstrated such uses shall not adversely impact water quantity or quality. Under no circumstances shall mining or other development activities associated with the use occur within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the mean high water line of the river.

3.B.1.5.a The Canby Sand and gravel site, identified in Board order 95-47, commenced the Goal 5 process in 1992 and has been designated as a significant Goal 5 aggregate site but has not completed the ESEE stage of the process. This site has been found to have significant aggregate and fish habitat. The County has delayed the decision to protect these Goal 5 resources until a concurrent examination of these resources is performed pursuant to the ESEE analysis in OAR 660, Division 16.

3.C Stream Conservation Area Policies

3.C.1 For areas that are outside both the Metropolitan Service District Boundary and the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, designate stream conservation areas along the corridors of fish-bearing streams based on Water Protection Rule Classification (WPRC) Maps created through the cooperative efforts of the Oregon Department of Forestry (DOF) and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) pursuant to OAR 629-635-000. Establish and manage conservation corridors based upon the following performance criteria:

3.C.1.1 Large stream conservation areas: A minimum 100 feet from the mean high water line shall be designated along all streams described as fish-bearing streams (Type F) with average annual flows of 10 cubic feet per second or greater as shown on WPRC maps.

3.C.1.2 Medium stream conservation areas: A minimum 70 feet from the mean high water line shall be designated along all streams described as fish-bearing streams (Type F) with average annual flows greater than two cubic feet per second and less than 10 cubic feet per second or greater as shown on WPRC maps.

3.C.1.3 Small stream conservation areas: A minimum 50 feet from the mean high water line shall be designated along all streams described as fish-bearing streams (Type F) with average annual flows less than two cubic feet per second as shown on WPRC maps.

3.C.1.4 Manage development and establish minimum setbacks from watercourses. Allow stream corridor crossings provided they do not interfere with fish movement.

3.C.1.5 Maintain vegetative fringe areas along fish bearing streams free of structures.

3.C.1.6 Establish residential lots of record exemption provisions to allow development on properties physically unable to satisfy the minimum setback requirements.

3.C.1.7 Manage stream conservation areas to maintain and enhance water flows from springs, seeps, side channels and other sources.

3.C.2 Sandy/Zig Zag/Salmon Rivers Design Plan and Policies

3.C.2.1 Implement the design plan for the Sandy/Salmon Rivers according to Map 3-1b, which illustrates uses. Management activities and land classifications shown on the map are consistent with land use policies and designations in the Land Use Chapter. Official maps showing precise boundaries and sites (scale 1"=2000') are on file at the Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development.

3.C.2.2 Limit development and intense recreation activities on those sites designated Protection Resource Areas on the Design Plan Map. Islands shall not be developed.

3.C.2.3 Apply policies contained in the adopted Mt. Hood Community Plan to the Sandy/Salmon Rivers.

3.C.2.4 Prohibit water appropriations or other withdrawals from the Salmon River unless it is demonstrated through current accepted methodology that anadromous and resident fish habitat will not be adversely impacted as determined by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

3.C.3 Clackamas River Design Plan and Policies

3.C.3.1. Implement the design plan for the Clackamas River according to Map 3-1a, which illustrates uses. Management activities and land classifications shown on the map are consistent with land use policies and designations in the Land Use Chapter. Official maps showing precise boundaries and sites (scale 1"=2000') are on file at the Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development.

3.C.3.2. Cooperate with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) in development of a coordinated management scheme for the scenic waterway section.

3.C.3.3. Limit development and intense recreational activities on those sites/areas designated Protection Resource Area on the Design Plan Map. Islands shall not be developed.

3.C.3.4. Develop, with the Oregon State Parks and Recreation Department, a Clackamas River Scenic Waterway Recreation Guide for river users that shows landmarks, access/egress points, and scenic waterway rules.

3.C.3.5. Study, for potential inclusion in the State Scenic Waterway Program, a Clackamas River "Gorge" from Estacada to Faraday Dam.

3.C.3.6. Encourage the posting of hazardous water signs in reaches of the river where safety hazards exist.

3.C.4 Molalla River Design Plan and Policies

3.C.4.1. Implement the design plan for the Molalla/Pudding Rivers according to Map 3-1c, which illustrates uses. Management activities and land classifications shown on the map are consistent with land use policies and designations in the Land Use Chapter. Official maps showing precise boundaries and sites (scale 1"=2000') are on file in the Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development.

3.C.4.2. Encourage new public access points to minimize traffic hazards, trespass, vandalism, and crop disturbance. Clackamas County shall evaluate public access sites shown by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife as indicated in the Pudding River Basin Master Plan for Angler Access and Associated Recreational Uses, 1969.

3.C.4.3. Limit development and intense recreational activities on those sites designated Protection Resource Areas on the Design Plan Map.

3.C.5 Tualatin River Design Plan and Policies

3.C.5.1 Implement the design plan for the Tualatin River according to Map 3-1d, which illustrates uses. Management activities and land classifications shown on the map are consistent with land use policies and designations in the Land Use Chapter. Official maps showing boundaries and sites (scale 1"=2000') are on file at the Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development.

3.C.5.2 Encourage new public access points to minimize trespass and vandalism on private property.

3.C.5.3 Identify public access points above River Mile 3.4 (Lake Oswego Diversion Dam) and discourage boating activities which create bank erosion due to wave action.

3.C.5.4 Cooperate with the State Water Resources Department and other appropriate agencies to implement the Willamette River Basin Plan.

3.C.6 Willamette River Design Plan and Policies

3.C.6.1 Implement the design plan for the Willamette River according to Map 3-1e, which illustrates uses. Management activities and land classifications shown on the map are consistent with land use policies and designations in the Land Use Chapter. Official maps showing precise boundaries and sites (scale 1"=2000') are on file at the Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development.

3.C.6.2 Support regulation of recreational activities in the rural portion of the Willamette Greenway to minimize conflicts between water-based recreational uses, manage the intensity of recreational uses, and buffer bankside uses from water-borne recreational activities including recreational noise levels. The County shall develop a joint land management program with the Oregon State Parks and Recreation Department for all County- and state-owned lands in the rural greenway.

3.C.6.3 Provide for recreational activities in the urban portion of the Willamette Greenway through a jointly developed management program with all incorporated cities. At a minimum, public safety, recreational use intensity, and recreational noise need to be addressed.

3.C.6.4 Exempt specified modifications of single family residences from the existing Greenway Conditional Use procedure. For all other uses, change of use, modifications, and intensifications, require Willamette River Greenway Conditional Use approval and compliance with provisions of the design plan and Policies 3.B.1.2 and 3.B.1.3 of this chapter.

3.C.6.5 Prohibit private noncommercial docks and moorages in limited-use rural portions of the Greenway to protect the natural river character.

3.C.6.6 Allow private noncommercial docks and moorages in urban and multiple-use rural portions of the Greenway through the Greenway Conditional Use provisions of the Zoning Ordinance which require an extraordinary exception in the rural portion.

3.C.6.7 Limit development and intense recreational activities on sites designated Protection Resource Areas on the Design Plan Map. Islands shall not be developed.

3.C.6.8 Encourage new public access points to minimize trespass and vandalism on private property. Emphasis shall be directed to the area from Gladstone to Milwaukie.

3.C.7 Cooperate with the State Water Resources Department and other appropriate agencies to implement the Willamette River Basin Plan.

3.D Habitat Conservation Area Policies

3.D.1 For areas that are inside the Metropolitan Service District (Metro) Boundary or the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, designate Habitat Conservation Areas as required by Title 13 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, a Statewide Planning Goal 5 program for riparian corridors, wetlands, and wildlife habitat.

3.D.2 Regulate development in Habitat Conservation Areas, and on parcels that contain Habitat Conservation Areas, in a manner consistent with Metro's acknowledged Goal 5 inventory, significance determination, and Economic, Social, Environmental, and Energy analysis.

3.D.3 Implement Habitat Conservation Area regulations by adopting by reference Metro's Habitat Conservation Areas Map, establishing an overlay zoning district, and applying development standards consistent with Metro's Habitat Conservation Areas model ordinance.

3.E Water Quality Resource Area Policies

3.E.1 For areas that are inside the Metropolitan Service District (Metro) Boundary or the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, designate Water Quality Resource Areas as required by Title 3 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, a Statewide Planning Goal 6 program for water quality.

3.E.2 Regulate development in Water Quality Resource Areas by adopting by reference Metro's Water Quality Resource Areas Map, establishing an overlay zoning district, and applying development standards consistent with Metro's Water Quality Resource Areas model ordinance.

3.E.3 Use Metro's Water Quality Resource Areas Map as a reference document, but rely on the text of the Zoning and Development Ordinance to establish criteria for the identification of protected water resources and the location of the boundaries of Water Quality Resource Areas.

3.F Wetlands Policies

3.F.1 For areas that are outside both the Metropolitan Service District Boundary and the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, prevent disturbance of natural wetlands (marshes, swamps, bogs) associated with river and stream corridors. Adjacent development shall not substantially alter normal levels or rates of runoff into and from wetlands. Site analysis and review procedures specified in the Open Space and Floodplains section of the Land Use chapter shall apply. (See Wildlife Habitats and Distinctive Resource Areas of this chapter).

3.F.1.1 Develop guidelines for compatible uses on wetlands and their peripheries, and for wetland restoration. Table 3-1 shall be used as a guide. Wetland restoration decisions shall be made on a site-specific basis.

3.F.1.2 The County recognizes the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory as a resource document for wetland identification in the County. Individual site development of inventoried lands will be reviewed for compliance with wetlands policies.

3.F.1.3 The County has insufficient information as to location, quality, and quantity of wetland resources outside of the Mt. Hood urban area and the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary to develop a management program at this time. If such information becomes available, the County shall evaluate wetland resources pursuant to Goal 5 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 16, prior to the next Periodic Review. In the interim, the County will review all conditional use, subdivision, and zone change applications and commercial and industrial development proposals to assure consistency with Section 1000 of the Zoning and Development Ordinance and goals and policies of Chapter 3 of the Plan.

3.G Groundwater Policies

3.G.1 Cooperate with appropriate state and federal agencies to inventory and catalog groundwater resources and their uses to assess groundwater potentials and establish management criteria and priorities to protect and maintain this natural asset.

3.G.2 Investigate the feasibility of maintaining or subsidizing a groundwater testing service, available to the County's citizens (upon request for a nominal fee) to assist in assuring adequate well water quality.

3.G.3 Cooperate in the monitoring of groundwater levels and quality with the Oregon Water Resources Department.

3.G.4 Protect groundwater supplies in rural, agricultural, and forest areas.

3.G.4.1 Implement large-lot zoning.

3.G.4.2 Regulate all subdivisions utilizing groundwater as a potable water source to promote long-term sustainability of groundwater supplies.

3.G.4.3 Regulate all development and land divisions utilizing groundwater as a potable water source located in areas classified by the State of Oregon as a groundwater limited area, critical groundwater area or other area where new groundwater appropriations are restricted by the State of Oregon, to promote long-term sustainability of groundwater supplies.

3.G.5 Develop programs to encourage the conservation of groundwater.

Agriculture

Preliminary estimates of the County's farm income show that it added over five hundred million dollars to the State's economy in 1987. The County ranked second among Oregon counties for total farm income according to the Oregon State University Extension Service. Production of nursery stock, Christmas trees, poultry, and vegetables have increased in recent years, along with traditional County crops of berries, tree fruits, field crops, and livestock.

In addition to its economic importance, farm land is valuable open space and provides urban buffers, visual resources, and wildlife habitats.

For additional consideration of agricultural lands, see the Land Use Chapter.

Agrigulture Goals

Preserve agricultural lands.

Maintain the agricultural economic base in Clackamas County and the State of Oregon.

Increase agricultural markets, income and employment by creating conditions that further the growth and expansion of agriculture and attract agriculturally related industries.

Maintain and improve the quality of air, water, and land resources.

Conserve scenic areas, open space and wildlife habitats.

3.H Agriculture Policies

3.H.1 Recognize agricultural areas through appropriate zoning. All agricultural areas shall continue unencumbered by activities/land uses unrelated to agriculture in order to insure productive farm land. Specific policies relating to land use in agricultural areas are found in the Land Use Chapter of this Plan.

3.H.2 Investigate the feasibility of irrigation projects in cooperation with the Oregon State University Extension Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Soil Conservation Service, and other state and federal agencies.

3.H.3 Encourage cooperative agricultural projects in support of small agricultural businesses within the County, e.g., establishment of a receiving/shipping station for fresh produce and a farmers market for the direct exchange of local farm products between growers and the public to benefit the economic viability of agricultural businesses.

3.H.4 Encourage food processing industries and services that support agriculture to locate in the County.

3.H.5 Cooperate with the Oregon State University Extension Service to promote education and dissemination of information on agricultural crops, methods and technology, special tax assessment programs, new farming techniques, and commercial agriculture opportunities for new farmers.

3.H.6 Encourage the appropriate agencies to assess agriculture's labor force problems and develop a program to alleviate these problems (e.g., provision of second job opportunities in Unincorporated Communities).

Forests

The forest resources of Clackamas County, primarily Douglas Fir, Western Hemlock and other coniferous trees, have provided thousands of jobs for many decades both in Clackamas County and the surrounding region. Timber volume is temporarily declining in the County as the old growth stands are replaced by younger forests. Sound management practices and coordination are needed by all forest owners.

Increased demand for outdoor recreation from a growing County and regional population places renewed emphasis on the need for balanced use and management of forest resources.

Development pressures pose a challenge to retaining and enhancing a healthy urban forest canopy. Accommodating growth inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary should be balanced with the preservation and planting of trees for their environmental, aesthetic, and economic benefits.

For additional consideration of forest lands, see the Land Use Chapter.

Forests Goals

Conserve and protect forest lands.

Provide continued employment in the forest products industry.

Protect, maintain, and conserve open space, environmentally sensitive areas, wildlife habitat, scenic corridors, recreational uses, and urban buffers.

Maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources.

Create conditions that will maintain or further the growth of the wood products industry.

Support principles and implementation of the Oregon Forest Practices Act.

3.I Forests Policies

3.I.1 Protect from conflicting land uses productive forest lands and related forested areas which are environmentally sensitive or otherwise require protection (watersheds, areas subject to erosion, landslides, etc.) (see Chapter 4-Land Use). Recognize forest producing areas through appropriate zoning.

3.I.1.1 Ensure that forest productivity data, based on cubic foot site classes, is current and revised periodically to reflect changes in commercial forest resources.

3.I.2 Encourage forest related industries, specifically firms doing secondary wood processing or those which use wood products now underutilized or considered waste--hardwoods, slash materials, etc.

3.I.3 Continue to support and coordinate programs of the Oregon State University Extension Service and the State Forestry Department to promote more intensive management of small woodlot forest lands, including the education and dissemination of information on timber management methods, special tax assessment incentives, and programs to aid in the marketing of small timber sales.

3.I.3.1 Encourage ready availability of regeneration stock, greater opportunity for equipment-sharing co-ops, and joint timber harvest programs to assist smaller woodlot and timber tract owners.

3.I.4 Encourage coordinated management of major forest lands by cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Oregon State Board of Forestry, and the private industry sector.

3.I.5 Cooperate and coordinate with appropriate state and federal agencies to ensure forest management practices that recognize the multiple resource values of forest lands. Impacts on environmentally sensitive areas such as slide and erosion hazard areas, sensitive fish and wildlife habitat, scenic corridors, unique natural and/or cultural features, etc, shall be minimized.

3.I.5.1 Encourage forest owners to restrict the use of off-road vehicles to specified areas where environmental damage and conflicts with other forest uses will be minimized.

3.I.5.2 Encourage public agencies to acquire through purchase, exchange, or easement, scenic areas now in private ownership in order to insure their preservation.

3.I.5.3 Encourage strengthening of the Oregon Forest Practices Act to include special consideration of scenic values in methods of harvesting, in addition to prompt clean up and regeneration (ref. State Forest Practices Act, Section 629-24-541(h), 1978) and ORS 527.710.

3.I.5.4 Support visual management techniques on federal lands within the County, e.g., alternating smaller harvests along scenic corridors to reduce large-scale impacts. Develop incentives to increase the management of scenic/watershed resources on privately owned forest lands, e.g., tax incentives for modifying harvest techniques in designated scenic corridors.

3.I.6 Initiate a tree conservation and planting program inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary to preserve urban forest areas and promote tree landscapes.

3.I.6.1 Implement tree conservation standards in conjunction with the processing of design review, land division, and conditional use applications to minimize and regulate removal of trees and other vegetation and protection of trees during construction.

3.I.6.2 Discourage excessive tree removal prior to development by imposing a five-year prohibition on approval of design review, land division, and conditional use applications, if such tree removal has occurred.

3.I.6.2.a Provide an exception for lands specially assessed as forestland on the effective date of the regulations.

3.I.6.2.b Provide an exception for minor modifications to approved developments.

3.I.6.2.c Allow unlimited removal of certain types of trees, such as those that are hazardous, diseased, or planted as a commercial crop.

3.I.6.2.d Allow unlimited removal of trees for certain purposes, such as utility line maintenance, or compliance with other legal requirements.

3.I.6.3 Develop non-regulatory approaches to encourage and facilitate tree preservation, maintenance, and planting. Such approaches may include public education and outreach, partnerships with other community organizations, and County-sponsored tree planting.

3.I.6.4 Develop an urban street tree planting and maintenance program that focuses on specified arterials (e.g., boulevards) and designated neighborhoods. This should be done in cooperation with businesses and community groups.

3.I.7 Adopt and implement an updated Forest Management Plan for County-owned forest land, emphasizing consolidation/exchange of scattered County holdings to facilitate more intensive programs for timber management, park development and acquisition, and protection of any recognized watershed, recreation, or scenic values.

Mineral and Aggregate Resources

Clackamas County is rich in mineral and aggregate resources, the conservation of which is an economic necessity to our society. Haul distances and development, however, have limited many options for use of these resources. To maintain the availability of these valuable resources, areas containing significant resources must be protected from the potential limitations on their use caused by encroachment of conflicting uses.

Mining and processing these resources generates noise, truck traffic, dust and other impacts that can be a problem where there are conflicting uses like nearby houses or a school. Conflicting uses can reduce the economic viability of the resource site. Regulating some conflicting uses is necessary to allow the use of significant mineral and aggregate resources to some desired extent. Development standards are required of mining and processing to reduce the adverse effects these activities may have on surrounding land uses. The county requires reclamation of the mined land for use consistent with the comprehensive plan.

Mineral and Aggregate Resources Goals

Protect and ensure the appropriate use of mineral and aggregate resources while minimizing adverse effects of mining and processing on surrounding land uses.

3.J Mineral and Aggregate Resources Policies

3.J.1 To identify and protect mineral and aggregate resources, the county will comply with Statewide Planning Goal 5 and administrative rules adopted by LCDC interpreting the Goal 5 planning process.

3.J.2 The county will maintain an inventory of mineral and aggregate resources. The inventory comprises three parts.

  • A list of sites the county has determined are not significant or not in its planning jurisdiction. These sites are "other sites."
  • A list of sites for which the county lacks specific information about the location, quality and quantity of the possible resource. These sites are "potential sites."
  • A list of sites the county has determined are significant Goal 5 resources. These sites are "significant sites".

3.J.3 Where the county has completed the Goal 5 planning process and developed a program for protection of a significant mineral or aggregate site, the county shall use a Mineral and Aggregate Overlay District. The county may use other tools to carry out its program to achieve the Goal. If any aspect of the overlay requires interpretation, the county shall rely on direction in the site-specific program in the comprehensive plan.

3.J.4 The county shall use the site plan review process for the Mineral and Aggregate Overlay District solely for determining whether an application to mine complies with the site-specific program developed through the county's Goal 5 analysis or complies with other standards of the Zoning and Development Ordinance.

3.J.5 Applicants may seek land use permits to mine mineral or aggregate sites not zoned with the Mineral and Aggregate Overlay District. Subject to applicable laws, on land zoned exclusive farm use, the county may only issue a permit if an aggregate site is on the county inventory of mineral and aggregate sites. The requirement that a site be on the comprehensive plan inventory shall not apply to sites zoned other than for exclusive farm use.

3.J.6 Before 2005, the county will review its list of potential sites to determine if information exists to judge the significance of these sites. If the county finds sites on the list of potential sites significant resources, it shall complete the Goal 5 planning process.

3.J.7 Before 1999, the county will complete its analysis for the Anderson Quarry site, the Canby Sandy and Gravel site, and the Oregon Asphalt Paving Company site. The county will follow administrative rules interpreting and implementing Statewide Planning Goal 5.

3.J.8 The county will coordinate its planning and permitting processes for mineral and aggregate resources with the Oregon Department of Geologic and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) and Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL).

3.J.8.1 To assist state agency permit decisions, the county will identify post-mining land uses as part of any program to protect a significant mineral or aggregate resource site.

3.J.8.2 The county recognizes the jurisdiction of DOGAMI for the purpose of mined land reclamation pursuant to ORS 517.750 to 517.900 and the rules adopted thereunder.

3.J.8.3 Unless specifically authorized by ORS 517.830(3), DOGAMI should delay its final decision on approval of a reclamation plan and issuance of an operating permit, as those terms are defined by statute and rule, until all issues concerning local land use are decided by the county.

3.J.8.4 No mining or processing activity, as defined by the Zoning and Development Ordinance, shall begin until the county has issued a final land use decision and the permittee provides copies of an approved reclamation plan and operating permit issued by DOGAMI or DSL.

3.J.9 The county shall resolve issues relating to mine truck use of public roads as directed in county transportation plans and policies. The county reserves the right to make agreements with aggregate operators about the use of county roads independent from its decisions in Goal 5 analysis.

Wildlife Habitats and Distinctive Resource Areas

Fish and wildlife species provide an essential "background" to our daily lives and must have the environments necessary to provide food, cover, and water in order to survive.

Clackamas County's well-known distinctive resources include mountains, rivers and lakes, forest lands, agricultural lands, unique natural vegetation, geological formations, and other natural features.

The popularity of such places as the Mt. Hood Highway Corridor, the Clackamas River Corridor, and the Willamette River is testimony to the quality of scenic resources available to the Portland metropolitan area and Clackamas County.

Visual corridors along scenic roadways, rivers, and major arterials, the prominent slopes in the urban areas, and other distinctive areas are landscapes highly sensitive to alteration and development.

Wildlife Habitats and Distinctive Resource Areas Goals

Maintain and improve fisheries and wildlife habitat to enhance opportunities for consumptive and non-consumptive uses.

Retain and enhance wetlands and riparian habitat to provide areas for fisheries and wildlife and to promote species diversity, bank stabilization, and storm water runoff control.

Protect the scenic landscapes and natural beauty of Clackamas County.

Provide an urban environment where trees and landscape plantings abound and where significant features of the natural landscape are retained.

Preserve and protect areas of unique and distinctive wildlife habitats, native vegetation, and geologic formations.

3.K Wildlife Habitat and Distinctive Resource Area Policies

3.K.1 Cooperate with wildlife management agencies to enhance fish and wildlife opportunities and populations. This includes cooperation with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife in its habitat improvement practices and programs and Wild Fish Management Policy, and with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to inventory and classify wetland environments.

3.K.2 Protect native plant species, wetlands, and stream bank vegetation on County-managed public lands.

3.K.3 Manage roadside spraying programs to minimize adverse water quality, and fish and wildlife impacts.

3.K.4 Support preferential taxation methods to encourage retention of riparian habitat, brushy fencerows, and wetlands on private lands.

3.K.5 Minimize adverse wildlife impacts in sensitive habitat areas, including deer and elk winter range below 3,000 feet elevation, riparian areas, and wetlands.

3.K.6 Encourage closure of temporary roads outside the urban area that are no longer necessary for fire protection or logging activities to reduce wildlife harassment during the critical seasons of winter and spring. Countywide, all new roads crossing streams containing anadromous fish shall provide fish passage facilities acceptable to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.

3.K.7 Expand, in conjunction with the cities and the County's community planning organizations, the detailed inventory of unique natural and scenic areas, including a visual resource inventory and map showing areas of outstanding visual sensitivity as well as blighted areas.

3.K.8 Protect areas of high visual sensitivity and/or unique natural areas by requiring development review for any development which would substantially alter the existing landscape, as specified in the Land Use Chapter of the Plan. The purpose is to integrate development with natural features, minimizing any adverse impacts.

3.K.9 Improve scenic quality of areas impacted by urban blight, working toward the following objectives:

3.K.9.1 Regulation and/or removal of advertising billboards

3.K.9.2 Screening junkyards and other unsightly areas

3.K.9.3 Placing of utility service lines underground

3.K.9.4 Requiring landscape buffers (berms, trees, etc.) between incompatible uses and in visually sensitive areas.

3.K.10 When natural resource activities (e.g., commercial timber harvesting) compete with retention of visual or unique/natural resources and values, the County shall coordinate with appropriate state and federal agencies to minimize significant adverse impacts. The County also will encourage the public acquisition of land through purchase or land exchange, or conservation easements in designated scenic corridors or vistas and unique/distinctive natural areas (see Map 3-2).

3.K.11 Protect and conserve sensitive bird resources to avoid degradation of habitat by requiring development review for any development which could potentially result in adverse impacts to sensitive bird nesting and rearing areas. See maps 3-3, Molalla State Park Great Blue Heron Rookery, and 3-4, Stevens Great Blue Heron Rookery.

3.K.11.1 Inventory and analyze, on a periodic basis, nesting and rearing areas of sensitive bird species pursuant to the Goal 5 and Oregon Administrative Review Rules 660, Division 16 provisions.

3.K.11.2 Establish standards and procedures for evaluating development activities that affect sensitive bird habitat areas.

3.K.11.3 Cooperate and coordinate with wildlife management agencies to identify sensitive bird habitat areas and protect sensitive bird populations. This includes cooperation with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife for inventorying habitat and reviewing development activities in habitat areas.

3.K.12 For areas that are inside the Metropolitan Service District (Metro) Boundary or the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, designate Habitat Conservation Areas as required by Title 13 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, a Statewide Planning Goal 5 program for riparian corridors, wetlands, and wildlife habitat.

3.K.12.1 Regulate development in Habitat Conservation Areas, and on parcels that contain Habitat Conservation Areas, in a manner consistent with Metro's acknowledged Goal 5 inventory, significance determination, and Economic, Social, Environmental, and Energy analysis.

3.K.12.2 Implement Habitat Conservation Area regulations by adopting by reference Metro's Habitat Conservation Areas Map, establishing an overlay zoning district, and applying development standards consistent with Metro's Habitat Conservation Areas model ordinance.

3.K.13 For areas that are inside the Metropolitan Service District (Metro) Boundary or the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, use the performance and implementation objectives and indicators identified in Table 3.07-13e of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan as the County's performance monitoring program for wildlife habitat protection and restoration.

3.K.14 In accordance with Statewide Planning Goal 5, the County will consider development of additional regulatory and non-regulatory programs to protect upland wildlife habitat identified on Metro's Regionally Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitat Inventory Map.

Natural Hazards

Policies for natural hazards protect County residents and prevent development in those areas with a potential for structural damage or destruction.

Natural Hazards Goals

Protect life, property, private and public investments from natural or man-induced geologic and/or hydrologic hazards.

Incorporated hazardous areas within open space networks encouraging these areas to remain natural.

3.L Natural Hazards Policies

3.L.1 Recognize floodplains as areas where high water presents hazards to life and property, and provide protection in flood hazard areas as stated in the Land Use Chapter.

3.L.2 Prevent development (structures, roads, cuts and fills) of landslide areas (active landslides, slumps and planar slides as defined and mapped by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, DOGAMI) to avoid substantial threats to life and property except as modified by 3.L.2.1. Vegetative cover shall be maintained for stability purposes and diversion of stormwater into these areas shall be prohibited.

3.L.2.1 Allow mitigation of identified landslide hazards based on established and proven engineering techniques, and related directly to an approved specific plan that avoids adverse impacts (see Land Use Chapter). Developers should be made aware of liability in such cases for protection of private and public properties from damage of any kind.

3.L.3 Apply appropriate safeguards to development on organic/compressible soils, high shrink-swell soils and wet soils with high water table (as defined in DOGAMI Bulletin No. 99) to minimize threats to life, private and public structures/facilities.

3.L.4 Insure that data on the severity and area of natural hazards is current and revised periodically to reflect any additional information.

3.L.5 Continue cooperation with DOGAMI in the delineation of earth faults. As the information becomes available, policies governing the location of structures and land uses shall be adopted as a part of the Plan. The County Emergency Operations Plan should be reviewed and modified as necessary to prepare for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and other natural hazards.

3.L.6 Regulate the use of hillsides and steep slope hazard areas in order to direct urban area development toward more suitable lands. As slope and other adverse conditions increase, the need to regulate development also increased in order to reduce major sources of erosion and storm runoff, and public costs of maintaining development.

3.L.6.1 Require soils and engineering geologic studies in developments proposed on slopes of 20 percent or greater. More detailed surface and subsurface investigations shall be warranted if indicated by engineering and geologic studies to sufficiently describe existing conditions (e.g., soils, vegetation, geologic formations, drainage patterns) and where stability may be lessened by proposed grading/filling or land clearing. DOGAMI Bulletin No. 99 provides general geologic data.

3.L.6.2 Establish any additional standards or criteria including the density for development on hillside slope and hazard areas, as stated in the Land Use Chapter. Density Transfers shall be encouraged to take advantage of natural topographic features such as benches or terraces. Joint hillside development projects shall be encouraged.

3.L.6.3 Establish a consistent, uniform method for calculating slope on a site specific basis in conjunction with zoning and subdivision ordinances.

Energy Sources and Conservation

Virtually all energy used in Clackamas County is imported in one form or another from other counties, states, or in the case of petroleum and natural gas, foreign countries. There is very little the County can do to affect the supply or cost of imported energy; however, it is possible to develop supplemental energy sources, such as geothermal, solar and waste by products, and to use energy efficiently once it enters Clackamas County.

The importance of energy conservation cannot be overemphasized. Conscientious application of a broad energy conservation program to all sectors of the energy market -- homes, businesses, industry and transportation -- could significantly cut the historical energy growth rate and reduce long-term energy price increases. Programs such as home weatherization produce immediate benefits due to reduced energy expenditures by the homeowner or renter, and the creation of new jobs.

Energy Sources and Conservation Goals

Conserve energy and promote energy efficiency and resiliency through source development, recycling, land use and circulation patterning, site planning, building design and public education.

3.M Energy Sources and Conservation Policies

3.M.1 Cooperate with the state legislature and appropriate state and federal agencies (Public Utility Commission, Geology and Mineral Industries, Forest Service, etc.) in programs to encourage alternative energy source development. Such programs will focus on (a) geothermal resources in the Cascades; (b) single building solar and wind conversion technologies; and (c) energy recoverable from solid wastes.

3.M.1.1 Support exploration, research and development of geothermal resources consistent with environmental protection policies of this Plan. The County also will cooperate in the development of any necessary transmission facilities designed to bring such energy to local industries and residences.

3.M.1.2 Cooperate with the State Department of Energy to undertake and evaluate studies on the specific nature and potential of the County's wind and solar energy resources.

3.M.2 Initiate solid waste recycling programs to reduce dependence on nonrenewable resources.

3.M.2.1 Work cooperatively with the Metropolitan Service District to develop a solid waste recycling program and refuse-derived fuel facility.

3.M.2.2 Facilitate recycling of domestic, commercial and industrial waste materials through collection franchises and conveniently located collection depots.

3.M.3 Encourage energy-efficient land use and circulation patterns.

3.M.3.1 Locate employment centers, shopping services, parks, recreational and cultural facilities, and medical/dental services near residential developments to minimize transportation, fully utilize urban services, and encourage neighborhood self-sufficiency.

3.M.3.2 Provide for high density developments near transit and major employment/shopping centers.

3.M.3.3 Develop an overall circulation system for the County which promotes transportation alternatives (transit, carpooling, bicycling, and foot travel) and improves traffic flow on major arterials (synchronized signals, vacating nonessential cross streets, access controls).

3.M.3.4 Design subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, and multifamily, commercial and industrial developments to encourage the use of transit, bicycles, and pedestrian walkways (see Land Use and Transportation chapters).

3.M.3.5 Encourage bike lanes/sidewalks on collector streets. Bike/pedestrian paths should be developed through long blocks and between cul-de-sacs to improve neighborhood circulation.

3.M.4 Encourage energy efficiency through site planning of all residential subdivisions and multifamily, commercial, and industrial projects.

3.M.4.1 Permit lot configurations within subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments to make maximum use of energy-saving features of the natural environment and minimize the effects of temperature extremes.

3.M.4.2 Retain natural terrain features and vegetation where practical which create micro-climates conducive to energy conservation in subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments and multifamily, commercial, and industrial developments.

3.M.4.3 Encourage planting of appropriate landscape materials to reduce solar impact in the summer, minimize winter heat loss and buffer against prevailing wind sources in Planned Unit Developments and multifamily, commercial and industrial developments.

3.M.4.4 Orient structures to enhance potentials for both passive and active solar collection where practical.

3.M.4.5 Allow low-density residential developments to include common-wall structures or attached dwellings.

3.M.4.6 Allow flexibility in yard size, setbacks, and building height to permit efficient building orientation and shapes.

3.M.4.7 Cluster structures to minimize road surfaces and utility networks and to provide the potential for common-wall construction or attached dwellings.

3.M.4.8 Allow flexible road standards for more energy-efficient circulation within developments. Streets should be of such widths as to serve only necessary functions and minimize use of asphalt.

3.M.4.9 Provide for adequate and convenient bicycle parking spaces in multifamily, commercial, and industrial developments.

3.M.4.10 Revise parking standards to reflect the trend to smaller automobiles and use of transit. The integration and sharing of parking facilities within commercial/industrial areas should be encouraged.

3.M.4.11 Permit planting of street trees in new subdivisions and along designated arterials to minimize temperature extremes, favoring deciduous trees (sun in winter and shade in summer) over evergreens and ornamentals.

3.M.4.12 Encourage large employment centers to provide priority parking spaces for carpools and vanpools, as well as incentives for increasing transit ridership.

3.M.4.13 Encourage eating facilities, day care facilities, and on-site recreational areas in large employment centers and large multifamily developments.

3.M.4.14 Provide incentives such as density bonuses for housing proposals demonstrating exceptional examples of energy-efficient site planning.

3.M.5 Encourage energy efficiency through building design and weatherization of existing structures.

3.M.5.1 Encourage flexibility in building and zoning codes to permit energy-efficient building design, such as commonwall construction, solar collection and underground/earth-sheltered structures.

3.M.5.2 Encourage architectural and design features which are conducive to energy efficiency and conservation, such as south facing windows, roof overhangs, awnings, double entry vestibules, storm windows, insulation, shutters, louvers, double glazed windows and draperies with thermal linings. Many of these same features also can be utilized in the weatherization of existing structures.

3.M.6 Cooperate with the cities, other agencies (e.g., educational) and energy purveyors (Portland General Electric, Northwest Natural Gas, etc.), in development of an education program to:

3.M.6.1 Publicize the importance of energy conservation and available weatherization programs.

3.M.6.2 Serve as a forum for addressing energy-related issues (e.g., recycling of domestic wastes, code weatherization of existing residences prior to sale, and need for a Countywide Energy Advisory Commission).

3.M.7 Continue implementation of the 1983 County Energy Management Plan for County activities and property, including assessment of vehicular policy and an energy audit of County buildings.

3.M.8 Support and facilitate the placement of electrical lines underground to increase infrastructure resiliency and promote wildfire mitigation.

 

Noise and Air Quality

Noise and air quality affect our health, our economic interests, and our quality of life. High noise levels affect a person's mental and physical well being and ability to work. Poor air quality can be a health hazard, impair views of scenic vistas, and erode and degrade structures. Air quality management is a regional responsibility, while noise control is more local.

Noise and Air Quality Goals

  • Maintain an environment not disturbed by excessive levels of noise.
  • Promote maintenance of an airshed in Clackamas County free from adverse effects on public health and welfare.

3.N Noise Policies

3.N.1 Cooperate with public agencies and the private sector to reduce noise, and continue to enforce the County noise ordinance.

3.N.2 Implement a procedure to minimize the impact of external noise on sensitive land uses.

3.N.1.1 Require, through the review process, buffering of noise sensitive areas or uses where appropriate. For example, adjacent to arterials, expressways, freeways or heavily used rail lines, landscaped berms or other solid barriers may be required. Encourage setbacks and/or noise insulation in structures.

3.N.1.2 Noise mitigation plans, subject to County approval, shall be required of significant new noise generating land uses adjacent to or impacting established noise sensitive properties.

3.N.1.3 Construction or reconstruction of high volume arterials, expressways, or freeways in or near residential areas may require sound buffers as part of the road project.

3.O Air Quality Policy

3.O.1 Cooperate with local, regional, state, and federal agencies and industry to maintain and/or improve local air quality.

Last Amended 9/9/2024

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Chapter 2: Citizen Involvement

Citizen involvement is essential in the governmental process to promote the general health and welfare of the total community. New approaches must be developed by local government to effectively involve citizens in the planning and decision-making process. Positive accomplishments can be achieved when citizens become involved in planning programs.

Issues

  • Public awareness and understanding of land use proposals
  • Communication between the County and community groups, special interests, and individuals
  • Public availability of land use information
  • Mechanisms for public participation
  • Methods for decision makers to respond to citizen concerns and comments
  • The role of various public groups in the planning process

Summary of Findings and Conclusions

  • ORS 215 and 197 require the County to provide opportunities for citizen participation and to establish a citizens committee to assist the County in implementing and evaluating its citizen involvement program.
  • Clackamas County has an officially adopted Citizen Involvement Program, and that program is evaluated annually by the Committee for Citizen Involvement.
  • Continued public awareness of and citizen participation in the ongoing planning process is essential to responsible decisions which recognize public concerns and priorities.

Goals

  • Promote public participation in formulation of the long-range goals, objectives, scope, and focus of the planning programs.
  • Encourage broadly based public participation representing all concerned geographical areas and diverse interests.
  • Provide an opportunity for every interested citizen to participate in the formative stages and throughout the planning process.
  • Insure successful citizen participation through ongoing education in the planning process.
  • Insure regular communication between citizens and County officials (governing body, Planning Commission, and Planning staff).
  • Insure a continuing citizen participation effort in the planning process and periodic reevaluation.

2.A Policies

2.A.1 Require provisions for opportunities for citizen participation in preparing and revising local land use plans and ordinances. Insure opportunities for broad representations, not only of property owners and Countywide special interests, but also of those persons within the neighborhood or areas in question.

2.A.2 Maintain a Committee for Citizen Involvement with membership that includes representatives of Community Planning Organizations and a diversity of occupation, geographic representation, and gender.

2.A.3 Direct the Committee for Citizen Involvement to develop and implement an annual action plan for citizen involvement.

2.A.4 The County will forward to affected CPOs copies of notices it receives from Metropolitan Service District, Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission, and other neighboring jurisdictions on opportunities for citizen participation regarding proposed Urban Growth Boundary Amendments and/or annexations and other land use matters.

2.A.5 Encourage community planning organizations throughout the County and promote recognized community organizations where none exist through direct mail and media information, sponsorship of organizational meetings, and other appropriate means.

2.A.6 Seek citizens' input not only through recognized community organizations, but also through service organizations, interest groups, granges, and other ways.

2.A.7 Recognize community organizations which meet the following requirements:

2.A.7.1 That one or more well-publicized general community meetings have been held for purposes of information, organization, adoption of bylaws, and election of officers;

2.A.7.2 That all community meetings shall be publicized in advance of the meeting date in accordance with existing state law, and participation shall be open to any property owner, resident, business owner, or representative of any nonprofit organization located within the community. Criteria regulating voting shall be included in the bylaws;

2.A.7.3 That the organization's structure is capable of providing necessary coordination and communication between its members and County departments, and elected and appointed officials;

2.A.7.4 That the boundaries of the community organization specifically define an area of mutual interests, appropriate geographic size and population for effective planning. These boundaries should take into account natural boundaries, commercial patterns, community organizations, and historic factors; and

2.A.7.5 That community organization bylaws, assuring satisfactory fulfillment of the above minimum requirements, be recognized by official Board of County Commissioners' action and placed on file with the County.

2.A.8 Insure continued support of a recognized community group as long as the group fulfills its responsibilities, maintains the above policies, holds at least two well-publicized meetings per year, and furnishes copies of minutes of meetings to the County, together with an up-to-date list of officers.

2.A.9 Require the following functions and responsibilities of community organizations:

2.A.9.1 Community organizations shall be advisory to the Board of County Commissioners, Planning Commission, and Planning Division on matters affecting their neighborhoods;

2.A.9.2 The organization may develop planning proposals with respect to land use, zoning, parks, water resources, open space and recreation, annexation, housing, community facilities, transportation and traffic, community services, and other factors affecting the livability of their neighborhoods;

2.A.9.3 Community organizations should review and advise the County on changes in the land use plan and zoning ordinance and may submit zoning recommendations to the County. Such recommendations shall be actively considered;

2.A.9.4 Community organizations should develop and submit annual requests for services supportive of their functions for County approval and inclusion during the regular budget process;

2.A.9.5 Community organizations may request funding of neighborhood projects for possible inclusion in the County budget and capital improvement program; and

2.A.9.6 Community organizations should continue the planning process by reevaluating the goals, objectives, and recommendations contained in the Comprehensive Plan or a Community Plan.

2.A.10 Assist community organizations by:

2.A.10.1 Insuring that the level of funding and human resources allocated to the citizen involvement program is sufficient to make citizen involvement an integral part of the planning process;

2.A.10.2 Providing a staff liaison for citizen participation;

2.A.10.3 Providing designated representatives of recognized community organizations with copying services, postage, supplies, voter and property owner mailing lists, staff assistance, etc., to aid in the planning process; and

2.A.10.4 Notifying community organizations of proposed land use actions and legislative changes as required by ordinances.

2.A.11 Promote informed public participation in decisions through sponsoring or conducting education programs and providing publications and printed materials.

2.A.12 Insure availability of planning documents and reports, as appropriate, through County offices and public libraries.

2.A.13 Insure that the County responds to citizen recommendations through appropriate mechanisms and procedures.

2.A.14 Continue to implement the County's adopted Citizen Involvement Program.
Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Last Amended 5/3/01

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4: Land Use

When the pioneers settled Clackamas County, the land resource appeared infinite. They cleared forest, carved towns from the wilderness, and used waterways as the arterials of commerce. Some lands were valued for certain uses. The alluvial valley of the Willamette River was among the first areas to be cleared for agriculture. The falls at Oregon City was one of the first industrial sites. From the earliest days, the value of strategic location for various uses of the land was recognized and exploited for man's benefit. The best sites were usually used first.

Now we realize that not only is land finite, but also that sites with desirable characteristics for certain types of development are scarce. A growing population is increasing demand for land of all types. It is increasingly important to evaluate characteristics of remaining sites to determine their optimum use.

The Oregon Legislature has provided for land use to be determined at the local level through a rational process of balancing state and local goals, human needs, and the site characteristics of land. Generally, the factors for designating land use categories in this plan include the following:

  • Physical site conditions such as soils, slope, and drainage
  • Present and projected needs of the people
  • Character of existing development
  • Financial impacts on the County and its residents
  • Community livability
  • Capacities of streets, sewers, water systems, and other facilities
  • Estimated market demand
  • Parcel sizes
  • Availability of transit
  • Proximity to jobs, shopping and cultural activities
  • Providing an adequate balance between various uses

The above factors alone are insufficient for planning a community. A planning process reflecting community values is needed to weigh various factors. This systematic approach involves identifying issues, developing alternative ways of dealing with the issues and choosing the most desirable alternative.

Issues

The major issues affecting future development in the County are:

  • Supply and location of land for urban uses
  • Density of residential uses
  • Intensity of commercial and industrial uses
  • Proximity of mutually supporting land uses
  • The cost impacts of various land uses
  • Compatibility or conflict between land uses
  • Competing demands for land having certain characteristics
  • Compatibility of city and County plans
  • Supply and location of land for rural uses
  • Preservation of land for agricultural and forestry uses
  • The character and appearance of neighborhoods
  • Compatibility of land use with supportive systems such as transportation and sewage
  • Protection of natural features and waterways from the impact of development
  • Provision of open spaces within the urban environment.

Land Use Definitions

This Plan divides the County into six principal land use categories: Urban, Urban Reserve, Unincorporated Communities, Rural, Agriculture, and Forest. This Plan also establishes one or more land use plan designations within each of these categories. Table 4-1 identifies all of the land use plan designations established by this Plan and the zoning districts that implement each designation.

Urban

Urban areas include all land inside urban growth boundaries. Urban areas are either developed or planned to be developed with adequate supportive public services provided by cities or by special districts. Urban areas have concentrations of people, jobs, housing, and commercial activity.

Urban Growth Boundaries: Urban growth boundaries are designated on the land use plan maps. They separate Urban areas from Urban Reserve areas, Unincorporated Communities, and Rural, Agriculture, and Forest areas. An urban growth boundary encompasses existing urban development and lands to accommodate urban growth forecasted for a 20-year horizon.

Immediate Urban Areas: Immediate urban areas are lands that are within urban growth boundaries, are planned and zoned for urban uses, and meet at least one of the following conditions:

  • Served by public facilities, including sanitary sewage treatment, water, storm drainage, and transportation facilities;
  • Included within boundaries of cities or within special districts capable of providing public facilities and planned to be served in the near future; or
  • Substantially developed or surrounded by development at urban densities.

Future Urban Areas: Future urban areas are lands within urban growth boundaries but outside immediate urban areas. Future urban areas are planned to be provided with public facilities, but currently lack providers of those facilities. Future urban areas are substantially underdeveloped and will be retained in their current use to ensure future availability for urban needs. Future urban areas are planned for urban uses but zoned for large-lot, limited development.

Future Urban Study Areas: Future urban study areas are lands that have been brought into an urban growth boundary but for which urban plan designations have not been applied. Planning will be conducted to determine urban plan designations and apply future urban zoning.

Urban Reserve

Urban Reserve areas lie outside an urban growth boundary and have been designated as highest priority for inclusion in an urban growth boundary when additional urban land is needed. Urban Reserve areas may be established pursuant to OAR Chapter 660, Division 21, or pursuant to OAR 660, Division 27. Metro designates Urban Reserve areas in the Portland metropolitan area. The cities of Sandy, Molalla, Estacada, and Canby, in coordination with the County, may designate other Urban Reserve areas.

Rural Reserve

Rural Reserve areas are intended to provide long-term protection for large blocks of agricultural land and forest land, and for important natural landscape features that limit urban development or define natural boundaries of urbanization. Rural Reserve areas shall not be included in an urban growth boundary or Urban Reserve area. Rural Reserves may be established pursuant to OAR Chapter 660, Division 27.

Unincorporated Communities

Unincorporated Communities, as defined in Chapter 660, Division 22 of the Oregon Administrative Rules, are settlements located outside urban growth boundaries in which concentrated residential development is combined with limited commercial, industrial, or public uses. Unincorporated Communities may have limited public facilities and services.

Rural

Rural lands are exception lands, as defined in Oregon Administrative Rules 660-004-0005(1), that are outside urban growth boundaries and Unincorporated Communities and are suitable for sparse settlement such as small farms, wood lots or acreage home sites. They lack public facilities or have limited facilities and are not suitable, necessary, or intended for urban, agricultural, or forest use.

Agriculture

Agriculture areas are those of predominantly Class I through IV soils as identified by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service or as identified in more detailed data; and other lands that are suitable for farm use due to soil fertility, suitability for grazing, climatic conditions, existing or future potential for irrigation, land use patterns, or accepted farming practices or are necessary to permit farming practices to be undertaken on adjacent or nearby lands.

Forest

Forest areas are composed of existing and potential forestlands that are suitable for commercial forest uses. Also included are other forested lands needed for watershed protection, wildlife and fish habitat, and recreation, lands where extreme conditions of climate, soil, and topography require maintenance of vegetative cover, and forested lands in urban and agricultural areas which provide urban buffers, wind breaks, wildlife habitat, scenic corridors, and recreational use.

Land Use Maps Section

Map 4-1 displays the unincorporated land within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary. Map 4-2 provides an index for the land use plan maps. Maps 4-3, 4-4, and 4-5 are land use plan maps for areas where the county has adopted land use plan designations by agreement with adjoining cities. As these cities adopt amendments to their maps, the county will consider adoption. County land use plan designations are shown on Maps 4-6 and 4-7. Land use plan maps adopted as part of a Community Plan or Design Plan in Chapter 10 automatically amend Maps 4-6 and 4-7. Map 4-9 displays urban and rural reserves designated pursuant to OAR 660, Division 27, and urban and rural reserves are also illustrated in greater detail on Map 4-7.

Urbanization

The goals and policies in the following section address the designation of lands for urban uses, conversion of lands from Urban Reserve to Future Urban plan designations, and County actions regarding Future Urban Study areas and Urban Reserve areas.

Urbanization Goals

  • Clearly distinguish Urban and Urban Reserve areas from non-urban areas.
  • Encourage development in areas where adequate public services and facilities can be provided in an orderly and economic way.
  • Insure an adequate supply of land to meet immediate and future urban needs.
  • Provide for an orderly and efficient transition to urban land use.
  • Distinguish lands immediately available for urban uses from Future Urban areas within Urban Growth Boundaries.

4.A General Urbanization Policies

4.A.1 Coordinate with Metro in designating urban areas within Metro's jurisdiction. Recognize the statutory role of Metro in maintenance of and amendments to the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary.

 

4.A.2 Coordinate with affected cities in designating urban areas outside of Metro. Land designated as a Rural Reserve, as shown on Map 4-9, shall not be designated as an Urban Reserve or added to an urban growth boundary. The following areas may be designated as Urban:

4.A.2.1 Land needed to accommodate 20 years of future urban population growth.

4.A.2.2 Land needed for increased housing, employment opportunities and livability from both a regional and subregional view.

4.A.2.3 Land to which public facilities and services can be provided in an orderly and economic way.

4.A.2.4 Land which insures efficient utilization of land within existing urban areas.

4.A.2.5 Land which is best suited for urban uses based on consideration of the environmental, energy, economic and social consequences.

4.A.2.6 Agricultural land only after considering retention of agricultural land as defined, with Class I having the highest priority for retention and Class VI the lowest priority.

4.A.2.7 Land needed after considering compatibility of proposed urban uses with nearby agriculture activities.

4.A.2.8 Land where the strategic location of employment and living opportunities can minimize commuting distance, traffic congestion, pollution and energy needs.

4.A.3 Land use planning for urban areas shall integrate all applicable policies found throughout the Plan including the following:

4.A.3.1 Locate land uses of higher density or intensity to increase the effectiveness of transportation and other public facility investments.

4.A.3.2 Encourage infilling of Immediate Urban Areas with a minimum of disruption of existing neighborhoods (see infill policies in the Housing Chapter).

4.A.3.3 Enhance energy conservation and transportation system efficiency by locating opportunities for housing near work and shopping areas.

4.A.3.4 Integrate developments combining retailing, office, and medium and high density housing at places with frequent transit service and pedestrian facilities.

4.A.4 Establish Urban Growth Management Areas and Urban Growth Management Agreements to clarify planning responsibilities between the County and cities for areas of mutual interest.

4.A.5 Establish agreements with cities and service districts to clarify service and infrastructure responsibilities for areas of mutual interest.

4.B Immediate Urban Policies

The following policies apply to Immediate Urban areas:

4.B.1 An area may be designated Immediate Urban consistent with the definition.

4.B.2 Use the following guidelines when evaluating proposed changes in zoning designations that convert an area from Future Urban to Immediate Urban status:

4.B.2.1 Capital improvement programs, sewer and water master plans, and regional public facility plans shall be reviewed to ensure that orderly, economic provision of public facilities and services can be provided.

4.B.2.2 Sufficient vacant Immediate Urban land should be permitted to ensure choices in the market place.

4.B.3 Apply urban zoning districts that implement the Plan through a legislative or quasi-judicial zone change process consistent with applicable state, Metro and local requirements.

4.B.4 Control land uses in Immediate Urban areas through the Zoning and Development Ordinance.

4.B.5 Place conditions on development to ensure adequate services and facilities prior to or concurrent with development.

4.C Future Urban Policies

The following policies apply to Future Urban lands:

4.C.1 Control premature development (before services are available) by:

4.C.1.1 Applying a future urban zone with a 10-acre minimum lot size within the Portland Metropolitan UGB except those lands identified in Policy 4.C.1.2.

4.C.1.2 Applying a future urban zone with a 20-acre minimum lot size or greater for areas planned for employment, industrial and commercial uses within the Portland Metropolitan UGB.

4.C.1.3 Applying within the urban growth boundaries of Canby, Estacada, Sandy, and Molalla, a five-acre minimum lot size or larger in rural, agricultural, and forest zones.

4.C.2 Review subdivision and partition applications to ensure that the location of proposed easements and road dedications, structures, wells, and on-site wastewater treatment systems are consistent with the orderly future development of the property at urban densities.

4.C.3 For land within the urban growth boundaries of Canby, Estacada, Sandy, and Molalla, require annexation to a city as a requirement for conversion to Immediate Urban unless otherwise agreed to by the City and County.

4.C.4 Implement dimensional and development standards to address compatibility, function, and aesthetics.

4.D Future Urban Study Area Policies

The following policies apply to Future Urban Study Areas:

4.D.1 Conduct a planning process consistent with the policies of Chapter 11 of this Plan, that coordinates with affected service providers, agencies, and jurisdictions, and meets pertinent state, regional and local requirements.

4.D.2 In the Portland Metropolitan Urban Area, develop Comprehensive Plan designations that are consistent with Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives and the Regional Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, including Title 11, and the following.

When areas are brought into the Urban Growth Boundary, the following actions shall be undertaken:

4.D.2.1 Control premature development (before services are available) within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary by applying a 20-acre minimum lot size to lands within the boundary that have the following plan designations: Unincorporated Community Residential, Rural Commercial, Rural Industrial, and Rural.

4.D.2.2 The County shall enter into discussion with nearby cities, agencies that provide public facilities and services, and area citizens, to determine how services and governance will be provided for the area.

4.D.2.3 Agreements shall be developed with affected cities and service providers to cooperate in development of a Concept Plan for the area, and to consider the Concept Plan in development of future Plans.

4.D.2.4 A Concept Plan shall be developed meeting state and regional requirements. Opportunity shall be provided to citizens and affected public agencies to participate in the development of the Concept Plan. In the Damascus area, the Damascus Concept Planning Study Report shall be used to provide background information and guidance for the Concept Planning process.

4.D.2.5 A request shall be made to revise state and regional transportation plans to reflect the Concept Plan.

4.D.2.6 Public facilities plans shall be developed or revised to accommodate the Concept Plan.

4.D.2.7 The Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Maps, Zoning and Development Ordinance and zoning maps shall be revised according to the Concept Plan.

4.D.3 Develop and adopt urban comprehensive plan designations that meet applicable state planning requirements and balance County planning goals adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. This will convert Future Urban Study Areas to Future Urban or Immediate Urban areas.

4.D.4 During development of Comprehensive Plan provisions pursuant to Title 11 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, consider the feasibility of providing and funding adequate infrastructure.

4.E Urban Reserve Area Policies

4.E.1 The following policies apply to Urban Reserve areas established pursuant to OAR 660, Division 21:

4.E.1.1 Clackamas County shall recommend to Metro land in Clackamas County which should be designated Urban Reserve, when Urban Reserve amendments to the Region 2040 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan are considered by Metro. The cities of Sandy, Molalla, Estacada and Canby, in coordination with Clackamas County, may designate and adopt other urban reserve areas in a manner consistent with OAR 660-021-0000.

4.E.1.2 Clackamas County will consider the following characteristics of each area when recommending Urban Reserve areas to Metro: potential for providing jobs within near proximity to housing; the feasibility and cost effectiveness of extending urban infrastructure; the suitability of an area to accommodate urban level densities; and, the relationship and implications to existing areas designated urban.

4.E.1.3 When considering the designation of Urban Reserve areas near Sandy, Molalla, Estacada and Canby, the County, in cooperation with the City, shall make findings and conclusions based on the requirements of OAR 660-021-0030.

4.E.1.4 Urban Reserve areas designated by Metro will be depicted on Metro's Region 2040 Growth Concept map. Designated Urban Reserve areas near Sandy, Molalla, Estacada and Canby shall be defined within the Urban Growth Management agreements with each city.

4.E.1.5 Lands within a designated Urban Reserve area shall continue to be planned and zoned for rural uses in a manner that ensures a range of opportunities for the orderly, economic and efficient provision of urban services when these lands are included in the Urban Growth Boundary. Planning and zoning shall be done in a manner consistent with OAR 660-021-0000 and the Metro Code, in areas where Metro has jurisdiction.

4.E.2 The following policies apply to Urban Reserve areas established pursuant to OAR 660, Division 27, as shown on Map 4-9:

4.E.2.1 The County will review the designation of Urban Reserve areas, in coordination with Metro, Multnomah and Washington Counties, within 20 years after the initial designation of these Urban Reserve Areas.

4.E.2.2 The County will participate in the development of concept plans for areas within Urban Reserve areas that are being considered for addition to the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary.

4.E.2.3 The County shall not amend the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning and Development Ordinance or the Comprehensive Plan Map or zoning designations:

4.E.2.3.1 To allow within Urban Reserve areas, new uses that were not allowed on the date the Urban Reserve areas were designated, except those uses authorized by amendments to the Oregon Revised Statutes or Oregon Administrative Rules enacted after designation of Urban Reserve areas.

4.E.2.3.2 To allow within Urban Reserve areas, the creation of new lots or parcels smaller than allowed on the date Urban Reserve areas were designated, except as authorized by amendments to the Oregon Revised Statutes or Oregon Administrative Rules enacted after designation of Urban Reserve areas.

4.F Rural Reserve Area Policies

The following policies apply to Rural Reserve areas established pursuant to OAR 660, Division 27, as shown on Map 4-9:

4.F.1 Land established as a Rural Reserve area shall not be included in an urban growth boundary.

4.F.2 Land established as a Rural Reserve area shall not be included in an Urban Reserve area established pursuant to either OAR 660, Division 21, or OAR 660, Division 27.

4.F.3 The County shall not amend the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning and Development Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan Map or zoning designations:

4.F.3.1 To allow within the Rural Reserve areas, new uses that were not allowed on the date Rural Reserve areas were designated, except as authorized by amendments to the Oregon Revised Statutes or Oregon Administrative Rules enacted after the designation of Rural Reserve areas.

4.F.3.2 To allow within Rural Reserve areas, the creation of new lots or parcels smaller than allowed on the date Rural Reserve areas were designated, except as authorized by amendments to the Oregon Revised Statutes or Oregon Administrative Rules enacted after designation of Rural Reserve areas.

4.G Population Coordination Policies

The following policies apply to population planning and coordination.

4.G.1 The County and its cities located inside the Metro boundary shall coordinate with Metro in establishing 20-year population projections in order to evaluate and provide sufficient lands necessary for housing and employment needs within each jurisdiction's planning boundary.

4.G.2 Pursuant to ORS 195.033, the County and its cities located outside the Metro boundary shall coordinate with the Portland State University Population Research Center in establishing 20-year population projections in order to evaluate and provide sufficient lands necessary for housing and employment needs within each city's urban growth boundary.

Urban Growth Concept

This section of the Land Use Chapter addresses the implementation of the Region 2040 Growth Concept as it applies to Clackamas County. It provides for design type areas that are consistent with the general locations shown on the Region 2040 Growth Concept Map.

Clackamas County, with approximately 67% of its population inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, is a partner in the region's efforts to efficiently utilize the land inside the boundary. This will minimize the need to expand the boundary and protect the land available for agricultural, forest and rural uses. The intent of the Urban Growth Concept is to focus increased development in appropriate locations, such as existing commercial centers and along transportation corridors with existing or planned high quality transit service. It also encourages increased employment densities in industrial and employment areas.

The provisions of the Urban Growth Concept apply in addition to other requirements identified in the Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. The Urban Growth Concept is designed to provide guidance for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Development Ordinance changes, as well as to identify specific development review requirements. All provisions except Green Corridors apply to lands inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary. Green Corridors apply to rural, agricultural and forest areas. Future Urban Study Areas are areas in transition. When concept planning is completed for these areas, growth concept design types will be adopted as appropriate.

Definitions

Growth Concept Design Types

The locations of the following design types are identified on the Clackamas County Urban Growth Concept Map: (Map 4-8) or as described below:

Regional Center: An area that is the focus of compact development, redevelopment, high quality transit service and multi-modal street networks. The intent of the Regional Center is to provide an area for the most intense development and highest densities of employment and housing.

Corridors: Areas located along streets which have existing or planned high quality transit service and feature a high quality pedestrian environment, convenient access to transit and increased residential and employment densities. The intent of the Corridor designation is to encourage increased densities by facilitating zone and plan changes in specific locations. In addition, it provides guidance for development review to implement a high quality pedestrian environment.

The streets where the Corridor design type designation is applied are: McLoughlin Blvd. (from Milwaukie to Gladstone), 82nd Avenue (within the Clackamas Regional Center Design Plan Area), Johnson Creek Boulevard (within the Clackamas Regional Center Design Plan Area), and Sunnyside Road (from 82nd Avenue to 139th Avenue).

Station Community: Areas centered around a light-rail or high capacity transit station that feature housing, offices and other employment, and a variety of shops and services that are easily accessible to pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users as well as vehicles. The intent of the Station Community designation is to encourage transit oriented development with a mix of high density housing and employment uses, a high quality pedestrian environment and other features designed to encourage high transit ridership.

Employment Areas: Employment centers mixing various types of employment and including some residential development as well. These areas include limited retail commercial uses primarily to serve the needs of the people working or living in the immediate area.

Industrial Areas: Areas set aside primarily for industrial activities. Supporting uses, including some retail uses, may be allowed if limited to sizes and locations intended to serve the primary industrial uses.

Regionally Significant Industrial Areas: Areas near the region's most significant transportation facilities for the movement of freight and other areas most suitable for movement and storage of goods. These areas, like Industrial Areas, are set aside primarily for industrial activities. Supporting uses, including some retail uses, may be allowed if limited to sizes and locations intended to serve the primary industrial uses. Supporting uses are limited to an even greater degree than in Industrial Areas.

Neighborhoods: Primarily residential areas that are accessible to jobs and neighborhood businesses. This broad category includes areas set aside for homes, parks and open space, schools, public services, and neighborhood business uses. The intent is to facilitate the Region 2040 "Inner Neighborhood" design type.

Green Corridors: Areas outside the Urban Growth Boundary adjacent to major transportation routes to neighboring cities where the rural character of the landscape and agricultural economy shall be maintained. The intent is to preserve the view sheds and maintain the rural character between urban areas along the major transportation routes.

Future Urban Study Areas: Areas brought within the Urban Growth Boundary for which the required planning has not yet been completed. The intent is to identify the areas where Title 11 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and Metro code specify that concept planning and other requirements must be completed before other Urban Growth Concept design types and urban plan designations can be applied. Future Urban Study Areas include areas identified on Map 4-8 and areas brought into the Portland Metropolitan UGB after the adoption of Map 4-8.

Urban Growth Concept Goals

  • Provide for a compact urban form, integrating the built environment, transportation network, and open space, that:
  • Minimizes the amount of Urban Growth Boundary expansion required to accommodate expected population and employment growth in the next 20 years.
  • Efficiently uses public services including transportation, transit, parks, schools, sewer and water.
  • Distinguishes areas for intensive development from areas appropriate for less intensive development.
  • Preserves existing stable and distinct neighborhoods by focusing commercial and residential growth in mixed use centers and corridors.
  • Develops mixed use centers and corridors at a pedestrian scale and with design features and public facilities that support pedestrian, bicycle and transit trips.
  • Maintain the rural character of the landscape between the Urban Growth Boundary and neighboring cities.

4.H Regional Center Policies

The Regional Center design type designation is applied to the Clackamas Regional Center, as identified on Map 4-8. The goals and policies applicable to the Clackamas Regional Center are located in Chapter 10: Clackamas Regional Center Area Design Plan.

4.I Corridor Policies

The Corridor design type designation is applied to sites adjoining the Corridor streets shown on Map 4-8. Corridor design type areas may be either continuous or development nodes. The areas of application for the Corridor design type are specified in Chapter 10 for all of the Corridor streets.

4.I.1 Policies that apply to all Corridor design type areas include:

4.I.1.1 Provide for both employment and housing, including mixed use.

4.I.1.2 Provide for a high level of bus usage, with land uses and transportation facilities to support bus use.

4.I.1.3 Encourage and support pedestrian travel with supportive land uses, frequent street connections, and sidewalks and pedestrian-ways.

4.I.1.4 Provide for vehicular traffic and auto-oriented uses, while expanding the share of trips via transit and other modes.

4.I.1.5 Enhance connectivity between neighborhoods adjacent to the Corridor Design Type Area and the Corridor Street.

4.I.2 Specific policies for the SE 82nd Ave, SE Johnson Creek Boulevard and SE Sunnyside Road (from 82nd Ave to approximately SE 117th Ave.) Corridor design type areas are located in Chapter 10: Clackamas Regional Center Area Design Plan.

4.I.3 Specific policies for the Sunnyside Road (from approximately SE 117th Ave to SE 139th Avenue) Corridor design type area are located in Chapter 10: The Sunnyside Corridor Community Plan.

4.I.4 Specific policies for the McLoughlin Boulevard Corridor design type area are located in Chapter 10: McLoughlin Corridor Design Plan.

4.J Station Community Policies

The Station Community design type designation is applied to sites surrounding a light rail or other high capacity transit station as shown on Map 4-8. The areas of application for the Station Community design type are specified in Chapter 10. Policies that apply to all Station Community design type areas include:

4.J.1. Provide for transit oriented development with land uses that support a high level of transit usage, such as a mix of high density employment and housing uses.

4.J.2. Provide a high quality pedestrian and bicycle environment with frequent street connections, walkways and bikeways.

4.J.3. Enhance connectivity between neighborhoods adjacent to the Station Community.

Specific policies for the Fuller Road Station Community are located in Chapter 10: Clackamas Regional Center Area Design Plan.

4.K Employment Area Policies

The Employment Area design type designation is applied as shown on Map 4-8. Policies that apply to Employment design type areas include:

4.K.1 Employment design type areas shall be developed to provide for a mix of employment and residential uses, including:

4.K.1.1 Industry, office and service uses,

4.K.1.2 Residential development,

4.K.1.3 Low traffic generating, land consumptive commercial uses with low parking demand which have community or region-wide market,

4.K.1.4 Limited retail uses appropriate in type and size to serve the needs of businesses, employees, and residents of the immediate Employment design type area.

4.K.2 The following are prohibited in an Employment design type area: a retail use with more than 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area in a single building; and retail uses with a total of more than 60,000 square feet of retail sales area on a single lot or parcel, or on contiguous lots or parcels, including those separated only by transportation right-of-way. These prohibitions do not apply:

4.K.2.1 To sites designated General Commercial on or before January 1, 2003; or

4.K.2.2 When allowed by zoning if: the Zoning and Development Ordinance authorized those uses on January 1, 2003; transportation facilities adequate to serve the retail uses will be in place at the time the uses begin operation; and the Comprehensive Plan provides for transportation facilities adequate to serve other uses planned for the immediate Employment design type area over the planning period.

4.K.2.3 When allowed by zoning if the uses: generate no more than a 25-percent increase in site-generated vehicle trips above permitted non-industrial uses; and meet the Maximum Permitted Parking—Zone A requirements set forth in Table 3.08-3 of Title 4 of the Regional Transportation Functional Plan.

4.L Industrial Area Policies

The Industrial Area design type designation is applied as shown on Map 4-8. Policies that apply to Industrial Areas include:

4.L.1 Limit the size of buildings for retail commercial uses, as well as retail and professional services that cater to daily customers, to 5,000 square feet of sales or service area in a single outlet, or multiple outlets that occupy more than 20,000 square feet of sales or service area in a single building or in multiple buildings that are part of the same development project. This limitation does not apply to training facilities, the primary purpose of which is to provide training to meet industrial needs.

4.M Regionally Significant Industrial Area Policies

The Regionally Significant Industrial Areas Design Type designation is applied as shown on Map 4-8. Policies that apply to Regionally Significant Industrial Areas include:

4.M.1 Limit the size of buildings for retail commercial uses, as well as retail and professional services that cater to daily customers, to 3,000 square feet of sales or service area in a single outlet, or multiple outlets that occupy more than 20,000 square feet of sales or service area in a single building or in multiple buildings that are part of the same development project. This limitation does not apply to training facilities, the primary purpose of which is to provide training to meet industrial needs.

4.M.2 Prohibit the siting of schools, places of assembly larger than 20,000 square feet, or parks intended to serve people other than those working or residing in the Regionally Significant Industrial Area.

4.N Neighborhood Policies

The Neighborhood design type designation is applied as shown on Map 4-8. Policies that apply to the Neighborhoods include:

4.N.1 Development of areas planned for residential, commercial and industrial uses within Neighborhood design type areas shall be guided by the urban land use policies of Chapter 4.

4.N.2 Areas designated as Low Density Residential shall achieve the densities outlined in the Low Density Residential policies of Chapter 4.

4.O Future Urban Study Area Policies

The Future Urban Study Area design type designation is applied as shown on Map 4-8. The goals and policies applicable to Future Urban Study Areas are located in the Urbanization section of Chapter 4.

4.P Green Corridor Policies

The goals and policies for Green Corridors shall be defined through a separate study as outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreements on Green Corridor and Rural Reserve and Population Coordination, signed by Clackamas County, City of Sandy, City of Canby, ODOT and Metro.

Residential

This section of the Land Use Chapter primarily addresses the location and density of housing. Chapter 6, Housing, establishes policies for other aspects of housing such as structure type, affordability, and design.

Low Density Residential areas are those planned primarily for single-family residential and middle housing development, with a range of lot sizes from 2,500 square feet to 30,000 square feet, depending on location, environmental constraints, and other site characteristics.

Medium Density Residential areas are those planned for up to 12 units per gross acre (exclusive of density bonuses and conditional uses).

Medium High Density Residential areas are those planned for up to 18 units per gross acre (exclusive of density bonuses and conditional uses).

High Density Residential areas are those planned for up to 25 units per gross acre (exclusively of density bonuses and conditional uses).

Special High Density Residential areas are planned for high-rise multifamily housing up to 60 units per gross acre.

Residential Goals

  • Provide opportunities to enhance neighborhoods with more diverse and affordable housing types and neighborhood-scale commercial uses.
  • Provide for a variety of living environments.
  • Provide for development within the carrying capacity of hillsides and environmentally sensitive areas.
  • Provide opportunities for those who want alternatives to the single-family house and yard.
  • Provide for lower-cost, energy-efficient housing.
  • Provide for efficient use of land and public facilities, including greater use of public transit.

4.Q General Residential Policies

4.Q.1 Determine permitted uses and the density of development through zoning. Zoning of Residential areas shall be consistent with this Plan. Timing of zoning district application shall be in accord with the orderly development of the County.

4.Q.2 Implement dimensional and development standards to address compatibility, function, and aesthetics.

4.Q.3 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

4.Q.4 Require dedication of designated Open Space areas where appropriate for purposes of developing the urban park or trails program.

4.Q.5 Establish minimum densities to help meet regional and local housing needs.

4.Q.6 Allow the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district to implement the Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, and High Density Residential land use plan designations according to the criteria in the Commercial Section of this Chapter.

4.Q.7 Require all Medium, Medium High, High, and Special High Density Residential developments to be subject to a design review process.

4.Q.8 When necessary, require improvements to existing streets and/or development of new streets to County standards prior to or concurrent with Medium, Medium High, High, and Special High Density Residential development.

4.Q.9 In Medium, Medium High, High, and Special High Density Residential areas, require pedestrian access to nearby schools, transit stations, commercial areas, recreational areas, and employment areas to be convenient and improved to standards determined through a design review process.

4.Q.10 Develop all Medium, Medium High, High, and Special High Density Residential areas with public sewer, public water, curbs, drainage controls, pedestrian/bikeway facilities, and street lighting.

4.R Low Density Residential Policies

4.R.1 Allow the following housing types:

 

4.R.1.1 Accessory dwelling units

4.R.1.2 Detached single-family dwellings

4.R.1.3 Manufactured homes

4.R.1.4 Middle housing

4.R.1.5 Prefabricated structures

4.R.1.6 Recreational vehicles

4.R.1.7 Single room occupancies

4.R.2 The following areas may be designated Low Density Residential if any of the following criteria are met:

4.R.2.1 Areas where a need for this type of housing exists.

4.R.2.2 Areas which are currently developed at low density and where little need exists for redevelopment.

4.R.2.3 Areas where transportation is limited to collectors and local streets.

4.R.2.4 Areas where sensitivity to the natural environment or natural hazards indicates a reduced density.

4.R.3 Zoning of Immediate Urban Low Density Residential areas and conversion of Future Urban areas to Immediate Urban Low Density Residential shall include zones of 2,500; 5,000; 7,000; 8,500; 10,000; 15,000; 20,000, and 30,000 square feet (R-2.5 through R-30). The following factors guide the determination of the most appropriate zone:

4.R.3.1 Physical site conditions such as soils, slope, and drainage:

4.R.3.1.a Land with soils subject to slippage, compaction or high shrink-swell characteristics shall be zoned for larger lots.

4.R.3.1.b Land with slopes of:

  • Less than 20 percent shall be considered for the R-2.5 through R-8.5 zoning districts.
  • 20 percent and over shall be considered for the R-10 through R-30 zoning districts.

4.R.3.1.c Land with hydrological conditions such as flooding, high water table or poor drainage shall be zoned for larger lots.

4.R.3.2 Capacity of facilities such as streets, sewers, water, and storm drainage systems.

4.R.3.3 Availability of transit: Land within walking distance (approximately one-quarter mile) of a transit stop should be zoned for smaller lots implemented by the R-2.5, R-5, R-7, and R-8.5 zoning districts.

4.R.3.4 Proximity to jobs, shopping, and cultural activities: Areas in proximity to trip generators shall be considered for smaller lots implemented by the R-2.5, R-5, R-7, and R-8.5 zoning districts.

4.R.3.5 Location of 2,500- and 5,000-square-foot lots: Location of 2,500 and 5,000 square foot lots, implemented by the R-2.5 and R-5 zoning districts, may be allowed in Corridor design type areas and where permitted by Community and Design Plans located in Chapter 10.

4.R.3.6 Need for neighborhood livability and variety: Areas that have historically developed on large lots where little vacant land exists should remain zoned consistent with the existing development pattern. Otherwise, unless physical or service problems indicate to the contrary, areas of vacant land shall be zoned for lots of 8,500 square feet or smaller.

4.R.3.7 Density average: To achieve an average of 7,500 square feet or less per lot in low density Future Urban areas when conversion to Immediate Urban low density residential occurs, the R-10 zone shall be limited to areas with 20 percent slope and greater. Flexible-lot-size land divisions and other buffering techniques shall be encouraged in those areas immediately adjacent to developed subdivisions with lots of 20,000 square feet or more to protect neighborhood character, while taking full advantage of allowed densities.

4.R.4 Permit transfer of density within a development even if different zoning districts or land use plan designations are involved. Encourage the transfer of dwelling units from hazardous or environmentally sensitive areas to areas which are less hazardous or less expensive to develop.

4.R.5 Establish special development criteria and density standards in the following areas (see Policy 3.L.6 in the Natural Hazards section of Chapter 3, Natural Resources and Energy):

4.R.5.1 On slopes over 20 percent, the following development criteria shall be met:

4.R.5.1.a Avoid major hazard areas

4.R.5.1.b Maintain the stability of the slope

4.R.5.1.c Grade without large or successive pads or terraces and without creating road grades in excess of County standards

4.R.5.1.d Maintain vegetation and natural terrain features to sustain slope stability

4.R.5.1.e Ensure that existing natural rates of run-off and erosion are not exceeded

4.R.5.1.f Protect visually significant slopes, ravines, ridgelines, or rock outcroppings in their natural state

4.R.5.2 In flood hazard areas or wetlands, the following development criteria, as well as the specifications in Chapter 3, shall be met:

4.R.5.2.a Avoid major flood hazard areas

4.R.5.2.b Maintain water quality and the natural function of the area to reduce or absorb flood runoff and to stabilize water flow

4.R.5.2.c Protect wildlife habitats, significant vegetation, and trees

4.R.5.2.d Protect any associated recreational values

4.R.5.3 Density standards in these areas shall be as follows:

4.R.5.3.a Land in the flood fringe and land with slopes over 20 percent shall be allowed to develop at no more than 50 percent of the density of the zone. If these lands are not developed, then up to 100 percent of the density may be transferred to more suitable land within the site, depending upon its characteristics. Density should be reduced as slope increases above 20 percent, with development discouraged on slopes over 35 percent.

4.R.5.3.b Land in the floodway and land on landslides shall not be allowed to develop, except on a lot of record and only after having met the provisions stated in Policies 4.R.4.1 and 4.R.4.2, and other relevant Plan requirements. However, 100 percent of the density allowed in the zoning district may be transferred to more suitable land within the site.

4.R.6 Ensure adequate provisions for schools, churches, and recreational facilities which are integral parts of all residential neighborhoods. The siting of these facilities shall be subject to conditions ensuring adequate design and safety, particularly with regard to vehicular and pedestrian access.

4.R.7 Encourage retention of natural landscape features such as topographic variations, trees, and water areas, and allow variation in housing type and design.

4.R.8 Require a site analysis for each development in areas designated as Open Space or where the County has identified the potential for significant impacts. This requirement may be waived in the event all development is transferred to more suitable land outside of areas designated as Open Space.

4.R.9 Require roads in land divisions to be County roads and connected directly with an improved County road, state road, or city street. Half streets and private roads may be allowed where appropriate.

4.R.10 Develop all land divisions in urban areas with public sewer, public water, drainage controls, and pedestrian/bikeway facilities. Street lighting and street trees may be required. Implementing ordinances shall set standards in which street lighting and street trees will be encouraged or required.

4.R.11 Determine the net density in planned unit developments recognizing that up to 15 percent of the gross area is for roadways.

4.R.12 Encourage subdivision design to eliminate direct vehicular access from individual lots onto major or minor arterials. Frontage roads should be used wherever possible.

4.R.13 Require stub streets in land divisions where necessary to provide access to adjacent property.

4.R.14 Develop residential land divisions as planned unit developments whenever one or more of the following criteria apply:

4.R.14.1 Any part of the site is designated Open Space on Map 4-6, North Urban Area Land Use Plan Map

4.R.14.2 More than 20 percent of the dwelling units are to be condominiums

4.R.14.3 Sites are large enough to warrant on-site provision of substantial open and/or recreation space

4.R.14.4 A large area is specifically identified by the County as needing greater design flexibility, increased open space, or a wider variety of housing types

4.R.15 Require a minimum of 20 percent of the total land area in all planned unit developments to be devoted to open space or outdoor recreational areas. Development for any other uses shall not be allowed. Parkland dedications may be part of the 20-percent open space requirement.

4.R.16 Require provisions for adequate maintenance prior to final plat approval to ensure the designated park area will be a community asset.

4.R.17 Allow flexible-lot-size land divisions provided that the average lot size is consistent with the base zone, as adjusted by density bonuses.

4.R.17.1 The smallest lot size allowable shall be 80 percent of the minimum average lot size allowed by the base density.

4.R.17.2 In planned unit development land divisions, the individual lot size is unrestricted.

4.R.17.3 For a middle housing land division, the individual lots size is unrestricted and average lot size does not need to be consistent with the base zone.

4.S Medium Density Residential Policies

4.S.1 The following areas may be designated Medium Density Residential when at least the first two criteria are met:

4.S.1.1 Areas where a need for this type of housing exists.

4.S.1.2 Areas with access to a major or minor arterial or collector. Siting should not result in significant traffic increase on local streets serving low density residential areas.

4.S.1.3 Areas located near or adjacent to commercial areas, employment concentrations, or transit stops.

4.S.1.4 Areas of deteriorating dwellings or structures in neighborhoods to stimulate private investment, infilling, and redevelopment, as long as one or more of the preceding criteria apply.

4.S.2 Limit the Planned Medium Density (PMD) zoning district to areas currently zoned PMD.

4.S.3 In Medium Density Residential zoning districts, provide for reduced density on hazardous land or steep slopes as stipulated in Policy 4.R.4.3.

4.S.4 Encourage variations in density on different parts of a large site and promote a variety in housing type, ownership, and design.

4.S.5 Require in all Medium Density Residential developments a minimum of 25 percent of the total gross areas to be landscaped, natural, and/or recreational areas. This landscaping requirement may be reduced during the design review process when pedestrian amenities or amenities that provide opportunities for passive or active recreation within the development are substituted for gross land area.

4.S.6 Existing mobile home parks which are designated Medium Density Residential shall not have the designation changed unless a plan for relocation of the existing tenants is submitted and approved. This plan shall demonstrate that existing tenants will be relocated prior to redevelopment of the property.

4.T Medium High Density Residential Policies

4.T.1 The following areas may be designated Medium High Density Residential when the first two and at least one of the remaining criteria are met:

4.T.1.1 Areas where a need for this type of housing exists.

4.T.1.2 Areas with access to a street designated as a major or minor arterial or collector. Siting should not result in significant traffic increase on local streets serving low density residential areas.

4.T.1.3 Areas adjacent to or within walking distance of a significant educational, cultural, recreational, or open space facility or area.

4.T.1.4 Areas located adjacent or in proximity to a designated commercial or industrial area on the Comprehensive Map.

4.T.1.5 Areas within 800 feet of a transit line or transit station or within one-quarter mile of such transit facility if easily accessible due to pedestrian amenities such as sidewalks, pedestrian ways, and streetlights.

4.T.2 In Medium High Density Residential zoning districts, provide for reduced density on hazardous land or steep slopes as stipulated in Policy 4.R.4.3.

4.T.3 Encourage variations in density on different parts of a large site and promote a variety in housing type, ownership, and design.

4.T.4 Require in all Medium High Density Residential developments a minimum of 25 percent of the total gross area to be landscaped, natural, and/or recreational areas.

4.U High Density Residential Policies

4.U.1 The following areas may be designated High Density Residential when at least the first three criteria are met:

4.U.1.1 Areas located either adjacent to or within proximity to major shopping centers, employment concentrations, and/or major transit centers.

4.U.1.2 Areas with access to a street designated as a major or minor arterial or collector. Siting should not result in significant traffic increase on local streets serving low density residential areas.

4.U.1.3 Areas free from known geologic hazards, flooding, or soils subject to slippage.

4.U.1.4 Areas adjacent to permanently protected open space or bodies of water as long as the above criteria apply.

4.U.2 In High Density Residential zoning districts, provide for reduced density on hazardous land or steep slopes as stipulated in Policy 4.R.4.3.

4.U.3 Encourage variations in density on different parts of a site and promote a variety of housing type, ownership, and design.

4.U.4 If the minimum residential density standard is achieved, allow office, retail, and commercial service uses with limits on floor area and standards to ensure compatibility with residential uses permitted in High Density Residential areas.

4.U.5 Allow existing commercial uses to remain or improve in High Density Residential areas as long as such uses are integrated with surrounding development.

4.U.6 Require all High Density Residential developments to provide a minimum of 25 percent of the total gross area to be landscaped, natural, and/or recreational areas. This landscaping requirement may be reduced during the design review process when pedestrian amenities or amenities that provide opportunities for passive or active recreation within the development are substituted for gross land area.

4.U.7 Encourage understructure parking.

4.V Special High Density Residential Policies

4.V.1 The following areas may be designated Special High Density Residential when all of the criteria are met:

4.V.1.1 Areas located either adjacent or close to employment concentrations in excess of 2,000 employees.

4.V.1.2 Areas within walking distance (approximately one-quarter mile) of a major transit station, and with good access to a major or minor arterial.

4.V.1.3 Areas where impact on adjacent neighborhoods will be minimal.

4.V.1.4 Areas free from known geologic hazards, flooding, or soils subject to slippage.

4.V.2 Encourage variations of density on different parts of a site through high-rise construction.

4.V.3 If the minimum residential density standard is achieved, allow office, retail, and commercial service uses with limits on floor area and standards to ensure compatibility with residential uses permitted in Special High Density Residential areas.

4.V.4 Allow existing commercial uses to remain or improve in Special High Density Residential areas as long as such uses are integrated with surrounding development.

4.V.5 Require all Special High Density Residential developments to provide a minimum of 40 percent of the total gross area to be landscaped, natural, and/or recreation areas. This landscaping requirement may be reduced during the design review process when pedestrian amenities or amenities that provide opportunities for active or passive recreation are substituted for gross land area.

4.V.6 Understructure or underground parking may be required.

Commercial

This section of Chapter 4 addresses the location of commercial land and the physical development of commercial zoning districts. Chapter 8, Economics, establishes policies for other aspects of commerce, such as commercial growth, economic diversity, and employment.

The Neighborhood Commercial zoning district is intended to allow for uses that provide goods and services to residential neighborhoods in locations easily accessible to these neighborhoods with minimal negative impacts. Neighborhood Commercial uses are compatible with residential areas and may be located in residential areas.

Community Commercial areas are designated for local shopping and services, including large grocery stores and other frequently patronized community services. Sale of a limited range of goods and services is allowed. Trade areas may encompass several neighborhoods. Uses are generally compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. Professional offices are allowed in this land use category.

Office Commercial areas are designated for a mix of offices; clean, light manufacturing; multifamily residential uses; and other compatible uses. Commercial service and retail uses are allowed on a limited basis.

Office Apartment areas are intended to provide for: a mix of office uses and compatible uses, such as residential uses; a high standard of architectural design and landscaping; and pedestrian improvements and pedestrian-oriented site and building design to support non-auto trips. Office Apartment areas are designated as mixed-use areas with an emphasis on office and multifamily residential uses. Compatible land uses may be allowed on a limited basis. This land use category includes uses generally compatible with development within designated Corridors.

General Commercial areas are designated for sale of a wide range of goods and services. Trade areas for establishments within this district may be extensive. This category includes uses which may be incompatible with residential areas. Outdoor storage and display are permitted. Manufacturing (excluding primary processing of raw materials, but not excluding manufacturing of edible or drinkable products retailed on the same site), professional offices, and multifamily residential uses are allowed in this land use category.

Retail Commercial areas are also designated for sale of a wide range of goods and services. Trade areas for establishments within this district may be very extensive. This category provides for intensive retail development, with limits on some land extensive uses, and also limits on outdoor storage. Professional offices and multifamily residential uses are allowed in this land use category.

Commercial Goals

  • Provide opportunities for a wide range of commercial activity ranging from convenience establishments close to neighborhoods to major regional shopping centers.
  • Ensure that access, siting, and design of commercial developments are suitable for the type of commercial activity.
  • Provide for the efficient utilization of commercial areas while protecting adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhoods.
  • Ensure that the minimum operational requirements of development are provided on-site.
  • Encourage attractive, compact shopping areas offering a wide range of goods and services.
  • Ensure that traffic attracted to commercial development will not adversely affect neighborhoods.
  • Limit expansion of commercial strips and encourage better design of existing strips to make them more functional and attractive.
  • Allow mixed use.

4.W Neighborhood Commercial and All Urban Commercial Plan Designation Policies

4.W.1 Determine permitted uses through zoning. Zoning of Commercial areas shall be consistent with this Plan. Timing of zoning district application shall be in accord with the orderly development of the County.

4.W.2 Require all developments to be subject to a design review process.

4.W.3 Implement dimensional and development standards to address compatibility, function, and aesthetics.

4.W.4 Allow the development of affordable housing pursuant to ORS 197A.445.

4.W.5 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

4.X Neighborhood Commercial Policies

4.X.1 Implement a Neighborhood Commercial zoning district, which may be applied to sites with a land use plan designation of Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, or High Density Residential. The Neighborhood Commercial zoning district may be applied to sites within residential areas which either have an historical commitment to neighborhood commercial uses, or satisfy all the following criteria:

4.X.1.1 The conditional use criteria of the Zoning and Development Ordinance.

4.X.1.2 The new site, or expanded site, is necessary to provide convenience commercial uses which are not currently available within the service area. "Service area", for purposes of this policy, shall be either:

4.X.1.2.a The readily accessible area within 2,000 feet of the proposed site; or

4.X.1.2.b A defined area with a minimum of 500 existing or potential dwelling units which are closer to the proposed site, and have as good or better access to the proposed site, than to existing commercial sites considering distance and topographical barriers. Potential dwelling units shall be determined on the basis of existing zoning.

4.X.1.3 Each Neighborhood Commercial site should be a maximum of one acre in size. To allow clustering of convenience uses, additional area may be added up to a maximum total area of two acres.

4.X.1.4 Sites shall have direct access to a street of at least a collector classification and preferably an arterial.

4.X.1.5 Sites should not include more than one quadrant of an intersection. If more than one quadrant is approved, it shall be shown that undue traffic congestion will not result.

4.X.2 Cluster buildings in Neighborhood Commercial areas to prevent strip development and require buildings to be compatible in design and scale with the surrounding neighborhood.

4.X.3 Require that improvements to streets be made when necessary prior to or concurrent with development. Bicycle/pedestrian facilities shall be provided.

4.Y Community Commercial Policies

4.Y.1 The following areas may be designated Community Commercial when the first criterion is met or all of the other criteria are met:

4.Y.1.1 Areas having an historical commitment to commercial uses.

4.Y.1.2 Areas which are separated from similar commercial uses by a least one-half mile. Each Community Commercial area should not exceed 10 acres.

4.Y.1.3 Areas having direct access to a street of at least a minor arterial classification. Siting should not result in significant traffic increase on local streets serving residential areas.

4.Y.1.4 Areas which do not increase an existing commercial strip.

4.Y.2 Require improvements to streets and/or transit access when necessary prior to or concurrent with development.

4.Y.3 Require sidewalks and bicycle facilities.

4.Y.4 Limit and define access to facilitate efficient and safe traffic movements. Joint access and provisions for vehicular and pedestrian movement between developments shall be required when necessary.

4.Y.5 Require curbs, drainage controls, and street lighting.

4.Z Office Commercial Policies

4.Z.1 The following areas may be designated Office Commercial:

4.Z.1.1 Properties or areas currently developed with office commercial uses or committed to such uses, or which are adjacent to properties developed or committed to such uses, and are required in order to protect such uses from incompatible development.

4.Z.1.2 Properties offering high visibility from a major highway or arterial which will not draw traffic through single-family neighborhoods.

4.Z.1.3 Properties or areas which provide a buffer between residential and commercial or industrial properties.

4.Z.2 Allow, as primary uses, institutional and cultural facilities, high-density housing, and bed and breakfast establishments.

4.Z.3 Allow service commercial uses with limits on the percent of floor area to be occupied.

4.Z.4 Require improvements to streets and/or pedestrian and transit access when necessary prior to or concurrent with development.

4.Z.5 Limit and define access to facilitate efficient and safe traffic movements. Joint access provisions for vehicular and pedestrian movement between developments shall be required when uses are complementary or compatible.

4.Z.6 Provide for high-quality building and site design through the application of strict development standards.

4.Z.7 Protect and promote Office Commercial areas for developments which project a positive image.

4.Z.8 Require sidewalks, drainage controls, and street lighting.

4.AA Office Apartment Policies

4.AA.1 Areas may be designated Office Apartment when they meet Policy 4.AA.1.1 or 4.AA.1.2:

4.AA.1.1 The area to be considered by the land use application is located in a Corridor design type area as defined in the Urban Growth Concept section of this Chapter.

4.AA.1.2 The area to be considered by the land use application is located on a Corridor street and the majority of the area is within 150 feet of the Corridor street right-of-way, and meets the following criteria:

4.AA.1.2.a Access to the site will meet transportation safety standards and not cause an unacceptable level of service on the Corridor street; and

4.AA.1.2.b The site can be developed consistent with access management plans that have been prepared for the Corridor street, e.g., Map 10-SC-5, and consistent with access management requirements implemented by the Zoning and Development Ordinance and the County Roadway Standards.

4.AA.2 Allow multifamily, quadplex, triplex, duplex, or townhouse uses in mixed-use buildings as part of developments that include office uses. Allow stand-alone housing only if developed as affordable housing pursuant to ORS 197A.445.

4.AA.3 Allow congregate housing facilities and nursing homes as limited uses.

4.AA.4 Allow compatible land uses as limited uses with limits on the amount of floor space used by the limited use.

4.AA.5 For each Office Apartment site area, a master plan for the entire contiguous site area designated Office Apartment shall be submitted for approval with any land use application. The master plan shall include a plan for consolidation of vehicular accesses for the entire site area. Master plan approval for Office Apartment site areas shall be required prior to allowing development or land divisions.

4.AA.6 Development shall comply with the following design requirements:

4.AA.6.1 Developments shall be designed at a pedestrian scale, with pedestrian amenities provided and pedestrian-oriented design used to support non-auto trips to the facility.

4.AA.6.2 Developments shall be designed in a series of low-rise buildings.

4.AA.6.3 Buildings shall be oriented towards streets.

4.AA.6.4 Development shall be integrated with the neighborhood using secondary accesses or, at minimum, pedestrian-only access to adjacent residential areas.

4.AA.6.5 Strict development standards shall be applied to provide for high-quality building and site design.

4.AA.6.6 Sidewalks, drainage controls, and street lighting shall be required.

4.AA.6.7 Improvements to streets and/or pedestrian and transit access shall be required when necessary, prior to, or concurrent with development.

4.AA.6.8 Access shall be limited and defined to facilitate efficient and safe traffic movements. Joint access provisions for vehicular and pedestrian movement between developments shall be required when uses are complementary or compatible.

4.BB General Commercial Policies

4.BB.1 The following areas may be designated General Commercial when either the first criterion is met or all of the other criteria are met:

4.BB.1.1 Areas having an historical commitment to commercial uses.

4.BB.1.2 Areas necessary to serve the shopping needs of County residents.

4.BB.1.3 Areas having access to a street of at least a major arterial classification or to a high capacity transit corridor. Siting should not result in significant traffic increase on local streets serving residential areas.

4.BB.1.4 Areas which do not increase an existing commercial strip or create new strips.

4.BB.1.5 Areas where adverse effects, such as traffic and noise, will have a minimal effect on adjacent neighborhoods or can be minimized through on-site improvements.

4.BB.1.6 Areas near employment centers.

4.BB.2 Require improvements to streets and/or transit access when necessary prior to or concurrent with development.

4.BB.3 Require sidewalks and bicycle facilities.

4.BB.4 Limit and define access to facilitate efficient and safe traffic movements. Joint access and provisions for vehicular and pedestrian movement between developments shall be required when necessary.

4.BB.5 Require curbs, drainage controls, underground utilities, and street lighting.

4.BB.6 Allow manufacturing (excluding primary processing of raw materials) and high-density housing within General Commercial areas.

4.CC Retail Commercial Policies

4.CC.1 Provide for retail commercial areas incorporating high standards and an attractive image, to meet regional shopping needs for a wide range of goods and services accessible by transit and automobile in areas such as the Clackamas Town Center.

4.CC.2 Provide for development oriented toward mass transit and pedestrian amenities.

4.CC.3 The following areas may be designated Retail Commercial when either the first criterion is met or all of the other criteria are met:

4.CC.3.1 Areas having an historical commitment to commercial uses.

4.CC.3.2 Areas necessary to serve the shopping needs of County residents.

4.CC.3.3 Areas having access to a street of at least a major arterial classification or to a high capacity transit corridor. Siting should not result in significant traffic increase on local streets serving residential areas.

4.CC.3.4 Areas which do not increase an existing commercial strip or create new strips.

4.CC.3.5 Areas where adverse effects, such as traffic and noise, will have a minimal effect on adjacent neighborhoods or can be minimized through on-site improvements.

4.CC.3.6 Areas near employment centers.

4.CC.4 Require improvements to streets and/or transit access when necessary prior to or concurrent with development.

4.CC.5 Require sidewalks and bicycle facilities.

4.CC.6 Limit and define access to facilitate efficient and safe traffic movements. Joint access and provisions for vehicular and pedestrian movement between developments shall be required when necessary.

4.CC.7 Require curbs, drainage controls, and street lighting.

4.CC.8 Allow high-density housing within Retail Commercial areas.

Industrial

This section of the Land Use Chapter addresses the location of industrial land and the physical development of industrial districts. Other aspects of industry such as industrial growth, diversity and employment are addressed in Chapter 8, Economics.

Business Park, Light Industrial and General Industrial areas are designated to accommodate manufacturing, processing, storage, wholesale distribution, and research facilities, as well as other compatible uses. Primary uses in Business Park areas generate no outdoor processing, storage, or display. Primary uses in Light Industrial areas generate minimal outdoor storage and no outdoor processing or display. General Industrial areas are intended to allow outdoor processing, storage, and display, with design and operational criteria to mitigate impacts on adjacent uses. In all industrial areas, development standards, including site planning, building type, truck and traffic circulation, landscaping, buffering, and screening shall be satisfied to ensure compatibility with, and an attractive appearance from, adjacent land uses.

Industrial Goals

  • Provide areas for general industry that meet the locational requirements of prospective industries and protect designated industrial areas from encroachment of incompatible uses.
  • Protect Industrial areas from the transportation impacts of residential and commercial development.
  • Protect areas adjacent to industrial areas from potential blighting effects of noise, dust, odor or high truck traffic volumes.
  • Conserve the supply of industrial land.

4.DD Business Park Policies

4.DD.1 Areas may be designated Business Park when all of the following criteria are met:

4.DD.1.1 Areas with good access to an existing or planned four-lane major arterial, expressway, or better road.

4.DD.1.2 Areas adjacent to a street of at least a collector status.

4.DD.1.3 Areas with significant natural or man-made amenities, as long as other criteria apply.

4.DD.2 The Business Park zoning district implements this designation.

4.DD.3 Require landscaping and strictly limit outdoor processing, outdoor storage and outdoor display, to enhance the appearance on site and from off site.

4.DD.4 Require all Business Park uses to be subject to development standards intended to maintain high aesthetics in the area.

4.DD.5 Require curbs, sidewalks, drainage controls, underground utility service lines, and street lighting.

4.EE Light Industrial Policies

4.EE.1 The following areas may be designated Light Industrial when either the first or all of the other criteria are met:

4.EE.1.1 Areas having an historical commitment to industrial uses.

4.EE.1.2 Areas with excellent access to the regional transportation network.

4.EE.1.3 Areas with access to a street of at least a minor arterial classification.

4.EE.1.4 Areas with sites large enough for several industries to cooperatively design an industrial park.

4.EE.2 The Light Industrial zoning district implements this designation.

4.EE.3 Determine permitted uses through zoning. Zoning of Light Industrial areas shall be consistent with this Plan and the stated purpose of compatible zoning districts. Timing of zoning district application shall be in accord with the orderly development of the County.

4.EE.4 Limit land uses other than industrial or industrially related uses but balance these limits with the need to provide locations for certain governmental, recreational or social service uses that may prove challenging to locate elsewhere.

4.EE.5 Clearly identify entrances and exits to facilitate efficient traffic movement. The internal circulation system should have broad lanes and turnarounds large enough to accommodate truck traffic. Access streets should include curbs and gutters.

4.EE.6 Require landscaping and limit outdoor processing, outdoor storage and outdoor display to enhance the appearance on site and from off site.

4.EE.7 Provide for pedestrian and bicycle access to adjacent transit corridors and, where applicable, to nearby residential areas. Require sidewalks when appropriate.

4.EE.8 Require storm drainage control measures as an integral part of all industrial area development to compensate for large roofs and paved parking areas within industrial areas.

4.EE.9 Require underground utility service lines and street lighting.

4.EE.10 Require all Light Industrial developments to be subject to the design review process.

4.EE.11 Encourage coordinated utility and traffic improvements in industrial land divisions.

4.FF General Industrial Policies

4.FF.1 The following areas may be designated General Industrial when either the first or all of the following criteria are met:

4.FF.1.1 Areas having an historical commitment to industrial uses.

4.FF.1.2 Areas with availability of rail service, access to navigable water, known mineral deposits or freeway access.

4.FF.1.3 Areas where buffering land uses or physical features provide protection for lower intensity land uses, particularly Low Density Residential areas.

4.FF.1.4 Areas having access to a street of at least a major arterial classification. Sites within the broader district may be accessed by roads of a lower classification. Designation shall not result in significant traffic increase on streets of less than a collector status serving residential areas.

4.FF.1.5 Areas with sites large enough to accommodate expansion of individual establishments or serve several establishments within one district.

4.FF.2 The General Industrial zoning district implements this designation.

4.FF.3 Determine permitted uses through zoning. Zoning of General Industrial areas shall be consistent with this Plan and the stated purpose of compatible zoning districts. Timing of zoning district application shall be in accord with the orderly development of the County.

4.FF.4 Limit land uses other than industrial or industrially related uses.

4.FF.5 Clearly identify entrances and exits to facilitate efficient traffic movement. The internal circulation system should have broad lanes and turnarounds large enough to accommodate truck traffic. Access streets should include curbs and gutters.

4.FF.6 Require landscaping to enhance the appearance on site and from off site.

4.FF.7 Provide for pedestrian and bicycle access to adjacent transit corridors and, where applicable, to nearby residential areas.

4.FF.8 Require storm drainage control measures to be an integral part of the site design and improvements if site development includes large roof and paved parking areas.

4.FF.9 Require sidewalks, when appropriate.

4.FF.10 Require curbs, underground utility service lines and street lighting.

4.FF.11 Require all General Industrial developments to be subject to the design review process.

Open Space and Floorplans

The protection of open space resources is an important objective, but the designation of an area as Open Space does not mean development is prohibited. Development can occur within the framework of preservation of essential open space elements, and the functioning of natural systems. Open space preservation also need not mean public ownership or public access. Many alternatives and methods of open space protection are available. An open space network must be established through early acquisition, where appropriate, or the imposition of clear, consistent controls on land containing significant natural resources or hazards.

Open space often coincides with areas subject to natural hazards, including the undeveloped 100-year floodplain. Floodplains consist of areas which are periodically inundated from stream flows, causing damage to property and threatening the lives of residents. The 100-year floodplain has an average flood frequency of at least once every 100 years, or a one-percent probability of flooding in any particular year. A distinct set of policies has been formulated to deal with the special problems associated with flood hazard areas.

Open Space and Floorplans Goals

  • Protect the significant natural features and systems of the County for the enjoyment of all residents and visitors.
  • Protect a network of open space to balance development within the urban area and provide needed contrast in the urban landscape.
  • Provide opportunities for needed recreation facilities.
  • Protect the lives and property of County residents from natural hazards.

4.GG Open Space Policies

4.GG.1 Designate as Open Space areas of land or water substantially free of buildings or other significant structures which also are one of the following:

4.GG.1.1 Natural resource areas with recognized unique or significant value, primarily those associated with stream/river corridors and hillsides.

4.GG.1.2 Areas with some constraint or degree of hazard for development, such as landslides, steep slope, or flooding.

4.GG.1.3 Existing parks and other committed open areas, such as golf courses, playgrounds, and cemeteries.

4.GG.2 Establish three categories of Open Space within the northwest urban area: Resource Protection, Major Hazards, and Public and Community Use.

4.GG.2.1 The purpose of Resource Protection Open Space is to protect natural resources and the open character of designated areas while allowing development according to the Plan. Resource Protection Open Space is land in one the following categories:

4.GG.2.1.a The flood fringe of 100-year floodplains

4.GG.2.1.b Areas within 100 feet of mean low water on all major rivers and 50 feet of any other permanent stream

4.GG.2.1.c Land within the Willamette River Greenway

4.GG.2.1.d Wetland areas

4.GG.2.1.e Distinctive urban forests

4.GG.2.1.f Hillsides of more than 20 percent slope

4.GG.2.1.g Areas of high visual sensitivity

4.GG.2.1.h Other distinctive or unique natural areas (see Natural Resources Chapter)

4.GG.2.1.i Undeveloped public land with potential for recreation.

4.GG.2.2 The purpose of Major Hazards Open Space is to protect the public from natural hazards. Major Hazards Open Space is land in any of the following categories:

4.GG.2.2.a The floodway of 100-year floodplains

4.GG.2.2.b Areas of known landslide hazard

4.GG.2.2.c Areas of severe erosion, unstable soil, or earth movement

4.GG.2.3 The purpose of Public and Community Use Open Space is to preserve community open space and its associated benefits, such as recreation. Public and Community Use Open Space is land in any of the following categories:

4.GG.2.3.a Parks and other recreation facilities

4.GG.2.3.b Cemeteries

4.GG.2.3.c Other publicly or commonly owned lands which function as open space

 

4.GG.3 Require that all residential developments over one acre in size and having 10 percent or more of designated Open Space, be Planned Unit Developments or flexible lot land divisions.

4.GG.3.1. Protect open space features by clustering development away from the more sensitive areas within a site, assembling adjacent parcels into a larger development, transferring density within the development, and reviewing design, landscaping, color and materials for compatibility with the site and natural features.

4.GG.3.2. Development on land which includes wetlands shall be designed to (1) maintain water quality and the natural function of wetlands, (2) reduce and absorb flood runoff and stabilize water flow, and (2) protect wildlife habitats.

4.GG.3.3. Apply to Major Hazard Open Space areas a Low Density Residential zone consistent with the area for the purpose of computing density transfer.

4.GG.4 Require that industrial and commercial development not disturb land designated as Open Space, unless unavoidable for the reasonable development of the site. Develop criteria for land coverage and development intensity to guide site planning and reduce impacts on open space features. Dedication of land for purposes of developing the urban parks and trail program shall be required as appropriate.

4.GG.5 Prepare, in a timely manner, a site analysis for any development in the northwest urban area affecting land designated as Open Space. In addition, the County may prepare an analysis for development in an area of high visual sensitivity for any development having significant impact upon the County.

4.GG.5.1 The County's analysis will supplement the applicant's environmental assessment and include the following:

4.GG.5.1.a An evaluation of the proposed development's impact on the relevant natural systems or features of the open space network.

4.GG.5.1.b Identification of applicable provisions or criteria of this Plan.

4.GG.5.1.c Alternatives to the proposal which might better achieve the optimum siting or design layout and protect the site's open space values.

4.GG.5.1.d An evaluation of the potential for public acquisition or dedication as part of the urban park or trail system.

4.GG.6 Prohibit development of areas designated Major Hazard Open Space except as provided in Policy 3.L.2.1 of the Natural Resources and Energy chapter, Natural Hazards Section, and Policy 4.R.4.3.b.

4.GG.7 Implement Public and Community Use Open Space through an Open Space zone. Public recreation or other compatible private or public uses and structures should be allowed, including golf pro shops, school play equipment, or park restrooms.

4.GG.8 Permit public acquisition of land intended for Public and Community Use Open Space purposes in all land use categories and amend the Land Use Plan Map accordingly.

4.GG.9 Use the best available data to make decisions on the extent to which a site may be developed in areas designated Open Space.

4.GG.10 Conversion of land designated Public and Community Use open space may occur when an alternate use proposal is accompanied by suitable retention or replacement of open space, developed recreation or other suitable compensating actions.

4.HH Floodplains Policies

4.HH.1. Designate as Floodplains the areas within 100-year floodplains. Refine Floodplain designations upon completion of detailed floodplain information including floodway and flood fringe.

4.HH.2. Encourage floodplains to be retained as open space in order to protect their ability to convey and store water. The use of Floodplains shall conform to the requirements of the Floodplain Management Zoning District.

4.HH.2.1. Restrict development and/or fill in the flood fringe to insure that danger to life and property will not result. The natural flow of water shall not be restricted, nor shall development which would significantly increase flood elevations be permitted.

4.HH.2.2. Prohibit development and/or fill in the floodway due to risk to life and property, flow diversion and increased flood elevations. Possible exceptions to this policy are commercial or industrial activities of a water-dependent nature approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or Division of State Lands.

4.HH.2.3. Allow riprap or other streambank protection measures only when they comply with river management policies in the Natural Resources and Energy chapter.

4.HH.2.4. Prohibit storage of toxic or hazardous materials in the floodplain. Materials used for construction which may be inundated shall be of such strength and quality that they will not deteriorate, and shall be able to withstand water pressure or the high velocity of flowing water.

4.HH.2.5. Require structures in the floodplain to be secured to prevent flotation. Septic tank lids shall be sealed to prevent loss of contents during flooding.

4.HH.2.6. Require the lowest floor of buildings designed for human occupancy to be at least one foot above the 100-year flood elevation.

Unincorporated Communities

Unincorporated Communities, as defined in Chapter 660, Division 22 of the Oregon Administrative Rules, are settlements located outside urban growth boundaries in which concentrated residential development is combined with limited commercial, industrial, or public uses. Unincorporated Communities may have limited public facilities and services.

There are four types of Unincorporated Communities:

Rural Community: an Unincorporated Community consisting primarily of residential uses but also including a minimum of two commercial, industrial, or public land uses. Redland, Beavercreek, Colton, Boring, Wildwood/Timberline, and Zigzag Village are Rural Communities.

Rural Service Center: an Unincorporated Community consisting primarily of commercial and industrial uses providing goods and services to the surrounding rural area or persons traveling through. Mulino and Rhododendron are Rural Service Centers.

Resort Community: an Unincorporated Community that was established primarily for, and continues to be used primarily for, recreation or resort purposes. A Resort Community includes residential and commercial uses as well as overnight lodging. Wemme/Welches is a Resort Community.

Urban Unincorporated Community: an Unincorporated Community that includes at least 150 permanent dwelling units and a mixture of other land uses, including three or more commercial, industrial, or public land uses. An Urban Unincorporated Community includes areas served by community water and sewer. Government Camp is an Urban Unincorporated Community.

Unincorporated Communities Goals

  • Provide for commercial and industrial development necessary to serve surrounding Agriculture, Forest, and Rural areas.
  • Provide residential areas supportive of the commercial and industrial uses.
  • Recognize and protect communities and their historic character.
  • Provide a balance of residential, commercial, and industrial uses conducive to a healthy economy for the community.
  • Provide employment opportunities for residents of the Unincorporated Community and surrounding non-urban areas.

4.II General Unincorporated Community Policies

4.II.1 The following areas may be designated Unincorporated Communities:

4.II.1.1 Land which has been acknowledged as a Statewide Planning Goal 3 or 4 exception area and historically considered to be part of the community provided the land only includes existing, contiguous concentrations of:

4.II.1.1.a commercial, industrial, or public uses; and/or

4.II.1.1.b dwelling units and associated residential lots at a greater density than exception lands outside Unincorporated Communities;

4.II.1.2 Lands planned and zoned for farm or forest use provided such land:

4.II.1.2.a is contiguous to Statewide Planning Goal 3 or 4 exception lands included in the community boundary;

4.II.1.2.b was occupied as of October 28, 1994 by one or more of the following uses: church, cemetery, school, park, playground, community center, fire station, museum, golf course, or utility facility;

4.II.1.2.c includes only that portion of the lot or parcel that is occupied by the use(s) above; and

4.II.1.2.d remains planned and zoned for farm or forest use.

4.II.2 Prohibit the expansion of Unincorporated Communities into areas of natural hazards.

4.II.3 Guide management of land use patterns in Unincorporated Communities by policies in this Plan and by those in community plans which are prepared as part of the County's continuing planning program as described in Chapter 11, The Planning Process.

4.II.4 Require development to be contingent upon the ability to provide public services (e.g., school, water, fire, telephone).

4.II.5 Develop roads in a manner and to a level compatible with Unincorporated Communities.

4.II.6 Residential uses should be allocated in a manner and to a level that supports the commercial and industrial uses and provides housing opportunities to meet needs while maintaining compatibility with adjacent land use designations.

4.II.7 Limit industrial uses to:

4.II.7.1. Uses authorized under Statewide Planning Goals 3 and 4;

4.II.7.2. Expansion of a use existing on December 5, 1994;

4.II.7.3. Small-scale, low- impact industrial uses, as defined in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-022-0030(11);

4.II.7.4. Uses that require proximity to a rural resource, as defined in OAR 660-004-0022(3)(a);

4.II.7.5. New uses that will not exceed the capacity of water and sewer service available to the site on December 5, 1994, or, if such services are not available to the site, the capacity of the site itself to provide water and absorb sewage;

4.II.7.6. New uses more intensive than those allowed under Policies 4.JJ.7.1 through 7.JJ.7.5, provided an analysis set forth in this Plan demonstrates, and land use regulations ensure:

4.II.7.6.a That such uses are necessary to provide employment that does not exceed the total projected work force within the community and the surrounding rural area;

4.II.7.6.b That such uses would not rely upon a work force employed by uses within urban growth boundaries; and

4.II.7.6.c That the determination of the work force of the community and surrounding rural area considers the total industrial and commercial employment in the community and is coordinated with employment projections for nearby urban growth boundaries; and

4.II.7.7. Industrial uses, including accessory uses subordinate to industrial development, sited on an abandoned or diminished industrial mill site, as defined in the Clackamas County Zoning and Development Ordinance, provided the uses will be located only on the portion of the mill site that is zoned for industrial uses.

4.II.8 Limit commercial uses to:

4.II.8.1. Uses authorized under Statewide Planning Goals 3 and 4;

4.II.8.2. Small-scale, low-impact uses as defined in OAR 660-022-0030(10); and

4.II.8.3. Uses intended to serve the community and surrounding rural area or the travel needs of people passing through the area.

4.II.9 Encourage commercial and industrial uses to locate in Unincorporated Communities to provide employment opportunities to residents of the communities and the surrounding non-urban area.

4.II.10 Require design review for commercial and industrial development.

4.II.11 Public facilities in Unincorporated Communities should be expanded or developed only when consistent with maintaining the rural character of the community.

4.II.12 Increased water service to an area shall not be used in and of itself to justify reduced lot sizes.

4.II.13 Sewage systems shall be contained within Unincorporated Community boundaries, and shall not be allowed to expand to land outside of such boundaries, except as provided by the Oregon Revised Statutes for abandoned or diminished mill sites or otherwise consistent with Policy 7.A.9.

4.JJ Unincorporated Community Residential Policies

4.JJ.1 Apply a plan designation of Unincorporated Community Residential to residential areas in Unincorporated Communities, except as modified by Chapter 10.

4.JJ.2 Implement the Unincorporated Community Residential plan designation through application of the Rural Area Residential 1-Acre (RA-1) zoning district.

4.JJ.3 Implement dimensional and development standards to address compatibility, function, and aesthetics.

4.JJ.4 Allow the following housing types:

4.JJ.4.1. Accessory dwelling units

4.JJ.4.2. Detached single-family dwellings

4.JJ.4.3. Duplexes

4.JJ.4.4. Manufactured dwellings

4.JJ.4.5. Prefabricated structures

4.JJ.4.6. Recreational vehicles

4.JJ.5 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

Rural Commercial

Rural Commercial lands are those that are outside urban growth boundaries and that are suitable based on specific factors for commercial development on a rural scale.

Rural Commercial Goals

  • To provide for the continuation of commercial uses in non-urban areas having an historical commitment to such uses.
  • To implement the goals and policies of this Plan for commercial development in Unincorporated Communities.

4.KK Rural Commercial Policies

4.KK.1 The Rural Commercial plan designation may be applied in non-urban areas to provide for commercial uses that are necessary for, and on a scale commensurate with, rural development.

4.KK.2 The Rural Commercial (RC) zoning district implements the Rural Commercial plan designation.

4.KK.3 Areas may be designated Rural Commercial when either the first or both of the other criteria are met:

4.KK.3.1 Areas shall have an historical commitment to commercial uses; or

4.KK.3.2 Areas shall be located within an Unincorporated Community; and

4.KK.3.3 The site shall have direct access to a road of at least a collector classification.

4.KK.4 Implement dimensional and development standards to address compatibility, function, and aesthetics.

4.KK.5 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

Rural Industrial

Rural Industrial Goals

  • To provide for the continuation of industrial uses in non-urban areas having an historical commitment to such uses.
  • To provide for the industrial redevelopment of abandoned or diminished mill sites.
  • To implement the goals and policies of this Plan for industrial development in Unincorporated Communities.

4.LL Rural Industrial Policies

4.LL.1 The Rural Industrial plan designation may be applied in non-urban areas to provide for industrial uses that are not labor-intensive and are consistent with rural character, rural development, and rural facilities and services.

4.LL.2 The Rural Industrial (RI) zoning district implements the Rural Industrial plan designation.

4.LL.3 Areas may be designated Rural Industrial when the first, the second, or both of the other criteria are met:

4.LL.3.1 Areas shall have an historical commitment to industrial uses; or

4.LL.3.2 The site shall be an abandoned or diminished mill site, as defined in the Zoning and Development Ordinance, provided that only the portion of the site that was improved for the processing or manufacturing of wood products may be designated Rural Industrial; or

4.LL.3.3 Areas shall be located within an Unincorporated Community; and

4.LL.3.4 The site shall have direct access to a road of at least an arterial classification.

4.LL.4 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

Rural

Rural lands are exception lands, as defined in Oregon Administrative Rules 660-004-0005(1), that are outside urban growth boundaries and Unincorporated Communities and are suitable for sparse settlement, such as small farms, woodlots, or acreage home sites. They lack public facilities or have limited facilities and are not suitable, necessary, or intended for urban, agricultural, or forest use.

Rural Goals

  • To provide a buffer between urban and agricultural or forest uses.
  • To perpetuate the rural atmosphere while maintaining and improving the quality of air, water, and land resources.
  • To conserve open space and protect wildlife habitat.

4.MM Rural Policies

4.MM.1 Areas may be designated Rural if they are presently developed, built upon, or otherwise committed to sparse settlement or small farms with limited, if any, public services available.

4.MM.2 Designation of additional Rural lands shall be based on findings that shall include, but not be limited to:

4.MM.2.1 Reasons why additional Rural land is needed or should be provided;

4.MM.2.2 An evaluation of alternative areas in the County that should be designated Rural and a statement of why the chosen alternative is more suitable;

4.MM.2.3 An evaluation of the long-term environmental, economic, social, and energy consequences to the locality, region, or state of designating the area Rural; and

4.MM.2.4 Reasons why designating the area Rural will be compatible with other adjacent uses;

4.MM.3 Areas impacted by major transportation corridors, adjacent to urban growth boundaries or areas designated Rural, and for which public services are committed or planned shall be given priority in designating additional Rural areas.

4.MM.4 Residential lot sizes shall be based upon:

4.MM.4.1 Parcelization;

4.MM.4.2 Level of existing development;

4.MM.4.3 Topography;

4.MM.4.4 Soil conditions;

4.MM.4.5 Compatibility with the types and levels of available public facilities;

4.MM.4.6 Proximity to Unincorporated Communities or an incorporated city; and

4.MM.4.7 Capacity and level of service of the road network

4.MM.5 Existing large lots should be reduced to meet future rural housing needs prior to expanding the areas designated as Rural.

4.MM.6 Areas with marginal or unsuitable soils for agricultural or forest use shall be given a higher priority for conversion to rural development than areas with more suitable soils.

4.MM.7 Public facilities should be expanded or developed only when consistent with maintaining the rural character of the area.

4.MM.8 Increased water service to an area shall not be used in and of itself to justify reduced lot sizes.

4.MM.9 The County shall encourage grouping of dwelling units with lot sizes less than the minimum allowed by the zoning district when such development is compatible with the policies in this Plan and the overall density of the zoning district.

4.MM.10 Lawfully established nonconforming structures and uses that are destroyed by fire, other casualty, or natural disaster shall be allowed to reconstruct, as provided by the Zoning and Development Ordinance.

4.MM.11 The Rural Area Residential 2-Acre (RA-2), Rural Residential Farm/Forest 5-Acre (RRFF-5), and Farm/Forest 10-Acre (FF-10) zoning districts implement the goals and policies of the Rural plan designation. These zoning districts shall be applied in Rural areas as follows:

4.MM.11.1 The RA-2 zoning district shall be applied when all the following criteria are met:

4.MM.11.1.a Parcels are generally two acres or smaller.

4.MM.11.1.b The area is significantly affected by development.

4.MM.11.1.c There are no natural hazards, and the topography and soil conditions are well suited for the location of homes.

4.MM.11.1.d A public or private community water system is available.

4.MM.11.1.e Areas are in proximity or adjacent to an Unincorporated Community or incorporated city.

4.MM.11.1.f In areas adjacent to urban growth boundaries, RA-2 zoning shall be limited to those areas in which virtually all existing lots are two acres or less.

4.MM.11.2 The RRFF-5 zoning district shall be applied when all the following criteria are met:

4.MM.11.2.a Parcels are generally five acres.

4.MM.11.2.b The area is affected by development.

4.MM.11.2.c There are no serious natural hazards, and the topography and soils are suitable for development.

4.MM.11.2.d Areas are easily accessible to an Unincorporated Community or incorporated city.

4.MM.11.3 The FF-10 zoning district shall be applied when one or more of the following criteria are met:

4.MM.11.3.a Parcels are generally ten acres.

4.MM.11.3.b The area is developed with a mixture of uses not consistent with extensive commercial agriculture or forestry uses.

4.MM.11.3.c Access to an Unincorporated Community or an incorporated city is generally poor.

4.MM.12 Implement dimensional and development standards to address compatibility, function, and aesthetics.

4.MM.13 Allow the following housing types:

4.MM.13.1 Accessory dwelling units

4.MM.13.2 Detached single-family dwellings

4.MM.13.3 Manufactured dwellings

4.MM.13.4 Prefabricated structures

4.MM.13.5 Recreational vehicles

4.MM.13.6 Single room occupancies

4.MM.14 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

Agriculture

Agriculture areas are those of predominantly Class I through IV soils as identified by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service or as identified in more detailed data; and other lands that are suitable for farm use due to soil fertility, suitability for grazing, climatic conditions, existing or future potential for irrigation, land use patterns, or accepted farming practices or are necessary to permit farming practices to be undertaken on adjacent or nearby lands.

Agriculture Goals

  • Preserve agricultural use of agricultural land.
  • Protect agricultural land from conflicting uses, high taxation and the cost of public facilities unnecessary for agriculture.
  • Maintain the agricultural economic base of the County and increase the County's share of the agricultural market.
  • Increase agricultural income and employment by creating conditions that further the growth and expansion of agriculture and attract agriculturally related industries.
  • Maintain and improve the quality of air, water, and land resources.
  • Conserve scenic and open space.
  • Protect wildlife habitats.

4.NN Agriculture Policies

4.NN.1 The following areas shall be designated Agriculture:

4.NN.1.1 Areas with predominantly Class I through IV agricultural soil as defined by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service or identified as agricultural soil by more detailed data;

4.NN.1.2 Areas generally in parcels of 20 acres or larger;

4.NN.1.3 Areas primarily in agricultural use;

4.NN.1.4 Areas necessary to permit farming practices on adjacent lands or necessary to prevent conflicts with the continuation of agricultural uses;

4.NN.1.5 Other areas in soil classes different from NRCS I through IV when the land is suitable for farm use as defined in Oregon Revised Statutes 215.203(2)(a), taking into consideration soil fertility; suitability for grazing; climatic conditions; existing and future availability of water for farm irrigation purposes; existing land use patterns; technological and energy inputs required; and accepted farm practices.

4.NN.2 Agriculturally related industries shall be encouraged.

4.NN.3 Land uses that conflict with agricultural uses shall not be allowed.

4.NN.4 New sewer facilities shall not be allowed in Agricultural areas, except when consistent with Policy 7.A.11 of Chapter 7, Public Facilities and Services.

4.NN.5 Roads shall be developed in a manner and to a level compatible with maintaining Agricultural areas.

4.NN.6 Education and dissemination of information on agricultural crops, methods, and technology; special tax assessment programs; and new land-use techniques should be encouraged.

4.NN.7 Lawfully established nonconforming structures and uses that are destroyed by fire, other casualty, or natural disaster shall be allowed to reconstruct, as provided by the Zoning and Development Ordinance.

4.NN.8 The Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) zoning district implements the goals and policies of the Agriculture plan designation and should be applied in Agriculture areas.

4.NN.9 Forest zoning districts which require a minimum lot size of 80 acres or larger may be applied in Agriculture areas provided the primary uses are forest and forest-related and that permitted uses will not conflict with agricultural uses.

4.NN.10 Except on lands within urban growth boundaries or as provided by the Oregon Revised Statutes for abandoned or diminished mill sites, exceptions to Statewide Planning Goals 3 and 4 shall be required for a plan amendment from the Agriculture designation to any designation other than Forest.

4.NN.11 The Special Use Overlay District implements Policy 9.B.11, applying to land designated Agriculture for which a local park master plan is adopted.

4.NN.12 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

Forest

Forest areas are composed of existing and potential forestlands that are suitable for commercial forest uses. Also included are other forested lands needed for watershed protection, wildlife and fish habitat, and recreation, lands where extreme conditions of climate, soil, and topography require maintenance of vegetative cover, and forested lands in urban and agricultural areas which provide urban buffers, wind breaks, wildlife habitat, scenic corridors, and recreational use.

Forest Goals

  • To conserve forestlands.
  • To protect the state's forest economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of timber as the leading use on forestland.
  • To conserve, protect, and enhance watersheds, wildlife and fisheries resources, agriculture, and recreational opportunities that are compatible with the primary intent of the plan designation.
  • To minimize wildfire hazards and risks.
  • To enhance and protect other environmentally sensitive areas.

4.OO Forest Policies

4.OO.1 The following areas shall be designated Forest:

4.OO.1.1 Lands suitable for forest use;

4.OO.1.2 Lands predominantly capable of generating at least 85 cubic feet of timber per acre per year;

4.OO.1.3 Areas generally in forest uses;

4.OO.1.4 Areas which are environmentally sensitive or otherwise require protection (watersheds, areas subject to erosion, landslides, etc.) should be designated Forest;

4.OO.1.5 Forested areas which buffer more intense land uses from areas of less intense use may be designated Forest.

4.OO.2 Encourage forest-related industries.

4.OO.3 Prohibit land uses that conflict with forest uses.

4.OO.4 Housing should be limited in Forest areas because it is generally incompatible with forest uses due to fire danger and accepted forest practices such as herbicide spraying and slash burning.

4.OO.5 Prohibit commercial and industrial development in Forest areas.

4.OO.6 Prohibit new sewer facilities in Forest areas, except when consistent with Policy 7.A.11 of Chapter 7, Public Facilities and Services.

4.OO.7 Encourage use of a Homestead provision that allows retention of a homesite with an existing dwelling and transfer of the remaining property as long as the transfer is compatible with Forest policies.

4.OO.8 Lawfully established nonconforming structures and uses that are destroyed by fire, other casualty, or natural disaster shall be allowed to reconstruct, as provided by the Zoning and Development Ordinance.

4.OO.9 Apply zoning districts consistent with state, regional, and County goals and United States Forest Service land allocation and management plans to the Mt. Hood and Willamette National Forests.

4.OO.10 This Plan and implementing ordinance provisions shall not conflict with the Oregon Forest Practices Act.

4.OO.11 The Timber (TBR) and Ag/Forest (AG/F) zoning districts implement the goals and policies of the Forest plan designation. The TBR zoning district shall be applied to areas predominantly in forest use. The AG/F zoning district shall be applied to areas having such a mixture of agricultural and forest uses that neither Statewide Planning Goal 3 nor Goal 4 applies alone.

4.OO.12 Except on lands within urban growth boundaries or as provided by the Oregon Revised Statutes for abandoned or diminished mill sites, exceptions to Statewide Planning Goals 3 and 4 shall be required for a plan amendment from the Forest designation to any designation other than Agriculture.

4.OO.13 The Special Use Overlay District implements Policy 9.B.11, applying to land designated Forest for which a local park master plan is adopted.

4.OO.14 Require utility service lines to be underground unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

Last Amended 9/9/2024

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5: Transportation System Plan

The Clackamas County Transportation System Plan (TSP) will guide transportation related decisions and identify the transportation needs and priorities in unincorporated Clackamas County from 2013 to 2033. The TSP has been created in coordination with the County's 16 cities, the State of Oregon, area transit providers, and other affected agencies and has been vetted through an extensive public process, including a series of public outreach events and twelve Public Advisory Committee meetings. The public and county staff worked together to develop the following vision for the TSP and six goals to guide implementation of this vision:

Building on the foundation of our existing assets, we envision a well-maintained and designed transportation system that provides safety, flexibility, mobility, accessibility and connectivity for people, goods and services; is tailored to our diverse geographies; and supports future needs and land use plans.

TSP Goals

  • Goal 1: Provide a transportation system that optimizes benefits to the environment, the economy and the community
  • Goal 2: Plan the transportation system to create a prosperous and adaptable economy and further the economic well-being of businesses and residents of the County.
  • Goal 3: Tailor transportation solutions to suit the diversity of local communities.
  • Goal 4: Promote a transportation system that maintains or improves our safety, health, and security.
  • Goal 5: Provide an equitable transportation system.
  • Goal 6: Promote a fiscally responsible approach to protect and improve the existing transportation system and implement a cost-effective system to meet future needs.

Background and Issues

The County's transportation system includes an extensive network of public and private transportation facilities, including roads, railways, airports, pipelines, waterways, and multi-use paths. The system is intended to allow people to travel where they need to go safely and efficiently, while also providing for efficient movement of goods. The County's transportation system is also intended to support sustainable land use patterns and policies to serve a multitude of public needs without sacrificing air and water quality or creating noise pollution.

Government agencies, public and private service providers, and developers are involved in building and maintaining the County's transportation system. Metro, Portland's metropolitan planning organization, sets general policy guidelines for design, distributes regional funding for certain types of projects within its boundary, and sets standards for the operation of the transportation system located within the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). All transportation facilities must conform to standards and guidelines outlined by federal, state and, in some cases, Metro regulatory documents.

Clackamas County faces several challenges as it attempts to continue to develop and maintain a safe and integrated transportation system, appropriate for and accessible to all potential users.

  • Limited funding: Funding levels for roads, the backbone of the transportation system, have not kept pace with the mobility needs of our society. Limited funding makes it a challenge to balance the need for maintenance and management of existing facilities with the need for building new facilities to accommodate increased trip demand. As a result, the backlog of needed road maintenance and construction projects has grown larger.
  • Reducing congestion: Community members help reduce traffic congestion when they choose to take the bus, join a carpool, or bicycle and walk to destinations. Reducing congestion decreases the need for costly road construction projects while improving air quality, neighborhood livability and access to goods, services and employment. 

    Improving the relationship between land uses and transportation can also decrease reliance on automobiles and reduce congestion. Some ways to improve this relationship are to: alter the site design of new construction at or near major transit stops; increase connectivity in transportation systems; provide better pedestrian and bicycle facilities; use land more efficiently; and encourage mixed-use developments.
  • Balancing needs: All land-based modes of travel, except rail and pipeline, must share the public rights-of-way. These modes includes autos, trucks, buses, bicycles, pedestrians and, in some localities, equestrians. Balancing the need for mobility (through movement of traffic) with the need for local movement and access to individual properties often creates design and safety challenges for roadways.
  • Safety: From 2005 to 2009, there were approximately 160 fatalities and 1,245 serious injuries in Clackamas County due to traffic crashes. One of the County's goals is to improve the safety of its system for all users and reduce the number and severity of crashes for future years. Developing facilities to accommodate all modes of travel will help reduce conflicts that lead to safety problems for some users. The adopted Transportation Safety Action Plan calls for a 50 percent reduction of fatal and serious injury crashes by 2022.
  • Fostering economic growth: Monitoring the effects of transportation on employment and economic activity is important during both good and bad economic times. Of particular significance are the ways transportation can be used as a tool to sustain and promote economic development both in the urban industrial and commercial centers and within the county's distinctive rural economy, including agriculture, forestry and equestrian facilities.
  • Addressing environmental impacts: Development of transportation infrastructure needs to be sensitive to potential impacts to neighborhoods and to the natural environment, in order to create and maintain livable communities, preserve air and water quality, and conserve energy. 

    The northwest urban area of the County is within a designated Air Quality Maintenance Area (AQMA). Presently the AQMA meets state and federal air quality standards, but federal law requires the region to implement measures to maintain federal air quality standards. Federal law also prohibits significant degradation of air quality in the Mt. Hood Wilderness.
  • Ensuring accessibility: In many areas of the County, transportation disadvantaged populations, such as the elderly, disabled or low-income residents, need improved access to public transit and special transportation services. Clackamas County will ensure that new and rebuilt roads are planned and designed to perform all necessary functions, including being accessible to those who choose not to drive or cannot drive.
  • Maintaining and improving rural area roads: Clackamas County also is challenged by the responsibility to maintain and develop a safe and functional road network in rural areas. Upgrades to aging rural roadways are needed to enhance safety and accommodate different modes of travel.

TSP Organization

To implement the vision and goals and to address the issues identified above, a series of policies have been created to direct the County in its efforts to build and maintain a multi-modal transportation system. Under each policy category, the countywide policies are listed first, followed by the urban policies, and the rural policies.

The policies are presented in this chapter by major topic or transportation mode as follows:

  • Foundation and Framework: includes policies relating to coordination; safety; equity, health and sustainability; intelligent transportation systems; and transportation demand management
  • Land Use and Transportation: includes policies relating to the integration of land use and transportation; parking; rural tourism; and scenic roads.
  • Active Transportation: includes policies relating to pedestrian and bicycle facilities and multi-use paths.
  • Roadways: includes policies relating to functional classification; urban and rural roadway considerations; project development; improvements to serve development; and performance evaluation and access standards.
  • Transit: includes policies relating to transit and transit-supportive amenities.
  • Freight, Rail, Air, Pipeline and Water Transportation: includes policies relating to general freight movement; freight trucking; rail; airports; pipelines; and water transportation.
  • Finance and Funding: includes policies relating to funding capital transportation improvements and maintenance.
  • Transportation Projects and Plans: includes policies relating to the 20-year and five-year capital improvement plans. Also identifies Special Transportation Plans that are adopted by reference as refinements of the TSP and plans or studies that need to be completed in the future to support the TSP.
  • Definitions: relevant definitions for use within this chapter.

The TSP also contains the following components:

  • The County's 20-year Capital Improvement Plan: a complete list of needed transportation-related projects to address gaps and deficiencies in the transportation network (Tables 5-3[a-d]).
  • Tables, Maps and Figures illustrating the transportation system and street cross sections, and presenting guidelines and standards for developing the system.
  • Background documents including detailed findings and conclusions relating to the various components of the transportation system (Appendix B).

Foundation and Framework

Clackamas County's transportation networks serve local communities and also tie into regional networks. Creating a transportation system that is safe and accessible for all users must be done within the context of federal, state, and regional regulations. The system needs to be responsive to new initiatives adopted by these regulatory bodies to ensure the development of a complete and sustainable transportation system. It needs to be responsive to new approaches, techniques and measures developed for assessing the performance of the system. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Travel Demand Management (TDM) techniques are two such tools that can be effective in managing the costs of the system and enabling better performance.

Safety is consistently mentioned by citizens as one of the highest concerns related to the transportation system, regardless of individuals' preferred methods of travel. The accessibility of the transportation system for all individuals is also a primary concern. Therefore, prioritizing safety and accessibility is essential in the planning, design, operation and maintenance of the transportation system.

5.A Compliance and Coordination Policies

5.A.1

Support intergovernmental partnerships needed to promote coordination and address multi-jurisdictional transportation needs.

5.A.2

Work collaboratively with federal, state, regional, and local agencies and with County residents to pursue the County's road safety programs and plans.

5.A.3

Work with state and local partners to implement the Oregon Transportation Safety Plan.

5.A.4

Coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) in implementing the Oregon Transportation Plan (OTP), Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and with other state transportation planning policies, guidelines and programs.

5.A.5

Work with the Oregon Office of Emergency Management to ensure that the TSP supports effective responses to natural and human-caused disasters and emergencies and other incidents, and access during these incidents.

5.A.6

Urban Coordinate with Metro and local governments to implement the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP), Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (UGMFP), and local transportation plans.

5.A.7

Rural Pursue formation of an Area Commission on Transportation (ACT) for the portions of Clackamas County outside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary to facilitate a coordinated approach to addressing issues on the state transportation system.

5.B Road Safety Policies

5.B.1

Update the Clackamas County Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) every five years to include necessary changes and document the progress toward the plan's goal of a 50 percent reduction in fatal and serious injury crashes by 2022.

5.B.2

Identify transportation system safety improvements that will reduce fatal and injury crashes for all modes of travel and meet the TSAP goal.

5.B.3

Address the County's top three crash cause factors of Aggressive Driving, Young Drivers (ages 15-25) and Roadway Departure utilizing education, emergency medical services, enforcement, engineering and evaluation.

5.B.4

Support programs, policies, regulations and actions that increase awareness and education about the safety of the transportation system for all users.

5.B.5

Support programs that utilize data-driven approaches to improve safety of the transportation system.

5.B.6

Align County departments, external safety groups, and other public agencies toward common transportation safety goals.

5.B.7

Integrate roadway, safety and traffic data management, health and emergency services data sources.

5.B.8

Integrate Highway Safety Manual (HSM) principles into the planning, engineering, design, operation and maintenance of the transportation system.

5.C Equity, Health and Sustainability Policies

5.C.1

Support programs and projects, such as pedestrian and bike connections to transit stops, that expand and improve transportation options for residents in areas with identified transportation-disadvantaged populations.

5.C.2

Protect neighborhoods, recreation areas, pedestrian facilities, bikeways and sensitive land uses (such as schools, daycare centers and senior centers whose users are more vulnerable to pollution) from transportation-related environmental degradation. Coordinate transportation and land use planning and use mitigation strategies, such as physical barriers and design features, to minimize transmission of air, noise and water pollution from roads to neighboring land uses.

5.C.3

Work with public agencies, private businesses and developers to increase and improve infrastructure necessary to support use of vehicles that use alternative fuels.

5.C.4

Ensure that programs to encourage and educate people about bicycle, pedestrian, and transit transportation options are appropriate for all County residents, particularly transportation-disadvantaged populations.

5.C.5

Build working partnerships between the County's Public Health and Transportation Divisions and utilize tools, such as health impact assessments, to better connect the effects of transportation projects with the health of communities.

5.C.6

Support the continued provision of public transportation services to County populations that are un-served or under-served, as well as the network of community-based, transportation services for seniors and persons with disabilities.

5.D Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Policies

5.D.1

Implement a wide range of ITS strategies aligned with the TSP vision and goals by ensuring safe, efficient, and equitable mobility for people and goods.

5.D.2

Update the ITS Action Plan every five years as part of the County's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program.

5.E Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Policies

5.E.1

Implement Transportation Demand Management techniques—including education, encouragement, and enforcement—appropriate for all County residents , in order to increase efficient use of existing transportation infrastructure and minimize congestion and safety concerns by offering choices of mode, route, and time.

5.E.2

Support and participate in efforts by Metro, the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), transit providers, and any area Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) to develop, monitor and fund regional TDM programs.

5.E.3

Provide adequate bicycle and pedestrian facilities to employment areas to encourage use of bicycles or walking for the commute to work and to improve access to jobs for workers without cars.

5.E.4

Support programs that work with schools to identify safe bicycle and pedestrian routes to connect neighborhoods and schools. Seek partnerships and funding to support improvement of these routes.

5.E.5

Urban Work with County employers located in concentrated employment areas to develop Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) to coordinate and support private-sector TDM efforts and to work toward mode share targets (Table 5-1) adopted in this Plan.

5.E.6

Urban Establish the following year 2040 non-drive-alone targets for growth concept design types (as identified on Map 4-8):

TABLE 5-1
Year 2040 Non-Drive-Alone Modal Targets

Design TypeNon-Drive-Alone Modal Target
Regional Centers, Station Communities, Corridors45-55% of all vehicle trips
Industrial Areas, Employment Areas, Neighborhoods, Regionally Significant Industrial Areas40-45% of all vehicle trips

5.E.7

Rural Encourage employers and schools outside urban growth boundaries to implement a range of TDM policies to help their employees and students reduce vehicle miles traveled, maximize use of existing transportation facilities, and increase walking, biking and transit use.

Land Use and Transportation

Integrating transportation plans with land use plans is a key element in effective management and operation of the entire transportation system. Roads support the wide range of land activities that take place in both the urban and rural areas. Because of the diverse nature of activities and land use types found in Clackamas County, it is of particular importance that the transportation systems are designed to accommodate both urban networks and the different needs of rural area users, including providing safe routes for users of all modes to enjoy the rural area's scenic beauty, and for those participating in agri-tourism and activities related to forestry.

Planning for appropriate amounts of parking supports efficient development of the land within communities. Accommodating on-street parking and planning for off-street parking needs are Transportation System Management (TSM) techniques that are consistent with the Metro Region's 2040 Growth Concept, meet the objectives of the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), and comply with DEQ's Air Quality Maintenance Plan.

5.F Integration of Land Use and Transportation Policies

5.F.1

Land use and transportation policies shall be integrated consistent with state law regarding preservation of farm and forest lands.

5.F.2

Support efforts to enhance and maintain the function of State highways and County arterials through land use policies, access management strategies, and roadway improvements.

5.F.3

Support and promote an integrated approach to land use and transportation planning and implementation that encourages livable and sustainable communities, decreases average trip length and increases accessibility for all modes.

5.F.4

Support and promote transportation investments that support complete and sustainable communities as a long-term strategy to reduce reliance on long commutes out of the County to employment destinations.

5.F.5

Recognize the County's rural economic engine and the importance of moving goods from rural businesses (including farms, nurseries, livestock, and lumber) to distribution centers.

5.F.6

Require changes in land use plan designation and zoning designation to comply with the Transportation Planning Rule [Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-012-0060].

5.F.7

Urban Require changes in land use plan designation within the Interchange Management Areas identified on Map 5-7 to be consistent with the Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060). If the land uses allowed by the new land use plan designation would cause the interchange mobility standards to be exceeded, either the change shall be denied or improvements shall be made such that the mobility standards are met.

5.G. Parking Policies

5.G.1

Set minimum and, where appropriate, maximum limits on allowed off-street parking of motor vehicles relative to building size, location and use, and to adjacent land uses. In the urban area, parking standards shall be coordinated with regional parking requirements.

5.G.2

Require new multi-family, commercial and institutional development to provide bicycle parking.

5.G.3

Allow shared parking and, where appropriate, on-street parking to be used to comply with parking standards.

5.G.4

Urban Allow the removal of existing, on-street parking along arterials and collectors to create bikeways, construct travel or turning lanes, or increase sight distance.

5.G.5

Urban Increase area for on-street parking in residential zoning districts by minimizing the width of driveway accesses.

5.G.6

Urban Encourage off-street parking in commercial, industrial, and high density residential areas to be located at the sides or rear of buildings, where practical.

5.G.7

Urban Consider allowing for decreased parking area requirements for development that:

  • provides housing in close proximity to a light-rail station; or
  • is located along a transit route, if the development provides pedestrian, bicycle and transit amenities. See Map 5-8a.

5.G.8

Urban Consider requiring shared parking within mixed-use development and where adjacent land uses are compatible.

5.H Rural Tourism Policies

5.H.1

Rural Encourage agri-tourism and other commercial events and activities that are related to and supportive of agriculture, in accordance with the provisions of ORS 215. Mitigation of traffic impacts and other event impacts may be required to reduce the effects of these limited land uses on the County road system.

5.I Rural Scenic Roads Policies

5.I.1

Implement a County Scenic Road System that is safe and attractive for all users.

5.I.2

Promote the protection of recreation values, scenic features and an open, uncluttered character along designated scenic roads.

Developments adjacent to scenic roads shall be designed with sensitivity to natural conditions and:

2.4021

5.I.2.1 Scenic roads shall have strict access control on new developments.

5.I.2.2 Scenic roads should have shoulders wide enough for pedestrians or bicycles, or a separated path where feasible and when funding is available.

5.I.2.3 Turnouts shall be provided where appropriate for viewpoints or recreational needs.

5.I.2.4 Design review of developments adjacent to scenic roads shall require visual characteristics and signing appropriate to the setting.

5.I.2.5 Buildings shall be set back a sufficient distance from the right-of-way to permit a landscaped or natural buffer zone.

5.I.2.6 Parking areas adjacent to scenic roads shall be separated from the right-of-way by a landscaped buffer.

5.I.2.7 Any frontage roads adjacent to scenic roads shall be separated by a vegetative buffer where feasible

5.I.2.8 Underground placement of utility service lines shall be required unless prohibited by the utility service provider.

5.I.3

The following facilities shall be designated scenic roads: (see Map 5-1 Scenic Roads)

  • Wilsonville Road
  • Stafford Road (City of Lake Oswego to Mountain Road)
  • Schaeffer Road
  • Pete's Mountain Road (Schaeffer Road to the Tualatin River)
  • SW Mountain Road, Canby Ferry Road, N. Locust, NE 37th, and Holly Street
  • Canby-Marquam Highway (City of Canby to Hwy 211)
  • Clackamas River Drive
  • Springwater Road (Clackamas River Drive to Hayden Road)
  • Hayden Road
  • Redland Road
  • Fischer's Mill Road
  • Marmot Road/Barlow Trail Road/
  • Ten Eyck Road/SE Lusted Road from Ten Eyck Road to the County line.
  • Lolo Pass Road
  • Salmon River Road
  • Still Creek Road
  • Timberline Road and West Leg Road
  • I-205 west of the Willamette River
  • Highway 99E from Oregon City to New Era Rd
  • Oregon City Bypass (Newell Creek Canyon segment)
  • Highway 211 (Canby-Marquam Highway to Estacada)
  • Highway 224 (Carver to Barton and south of Estacada)
  • Highway 26 east of the City of Sandy
  • Highway 35/Forest Service Road 386

5.I.4

Support implementation of the Oregon Scenic Byway System, including the Mt. Hood Scenic Byway and the West Cascades Scenic Byway.

Active Transportaton

Recognizing the increasing importance of having multiple ways to travel through a community and through the region has led to an increased awareness for designing transportation systems to safely enhance active transportation modes. "Active Transportation" is defined to include walking, bicycling, horseback riding and other mobility options, including scooters and electric bicycles.

Walk Bike Clackamas (WBC), adopted by reference in Appendix A, is the county's combined pedestrian and bicycle master plan. The WBC Plan updates the 1996 Clackamas County Pedestrian Master Plan and the 1996 Clackamas County Bicycle Master Plan. The following six goals guided plan development and served as the basis for establishing the objectives, supportive actions and performance measures of the WBC Plan.

  • Safety: Improve the safety of people walking and bicycling through safe street design and supportive programs.
  • Accessibility: Ensure walkways and bikeways are accessible to people of all ages, abilities and incomes.
  • * Connectivity: Develop and maintain walking and biking routes that provide convenient and clear connections to important community destinations in Clackamas County.
  • Sustainability: Overreliance should not be placed on any one transportation mode. Expand and promote walking and biking options that optimize the environment, the economy and community benefits.
  • Equity: Focus investments to ensure safe transportation alternatives regardless of age, race, income, gender and ability.
  • Health: Plan and provide infrastructure that allows people to safely walk, run or bicycle for improved health.

The WBC Plan was prepared under the guidance of the 18-member Walk Bike Advisory Committee and Clackamas County Pedestrian and Bikeway Advisory Committee, which was guided by the following vision:

Walk Bike Clackamas is a comprehensive, long-term roadmap to improve opportunities for people of all ages and abilities walking and biking as they travel in the county.

In addition, the Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan (ATP), adopted by reference in Appendix A, contains priority routes connecting communities in both the urban and rural portions of the County. Development of the principal active transportation routes described in the ATP would provide opportunities for residents to safely bicycle or walk to schools, parks, shopping, and employment centers.

5.J General Active Transportation Policies

5.J.1

Coordinate the implementation of pedestrian facilities and bikeways with neighboring jurisdictions and jurisdictions within the county.

5.J.2

Ensure an opportunity for a diverse and representative citizen involvement in the county pedestrian and bicycle planning process by supporting the Clackamas County Pedestrian and Bikeway Advisory Committee (PBAC) as a forum for public input. Recruit representatives of Communities of Interest populations as part of this process.

5.J.3

Monitor and update the Walk Bike Clackamas Plan and Active Transportation Plan through data collection and evaluation, and review activities necessary to maintain and expand the programs established in these plans.

5.J.4

Support bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects that serve the needs of Communities of Interest populations.

5.J.5

Coordinate with pedestrian, bicycle, and trail master plans, and with special transportation plans of the County, Oregon Department of Transportation, the United States Forest Service, Metro, and parks providers to achieve safe and convenient crossings and off-road, multi-use path and trail systems connecting to on-road pedestrian facilities and the bikeway networks.

5.J.6

Support the continuation of the "Bikes on Transit" program on all public transit routes.

5.J.7

Inform property owners of their responsibilities for the maintenance of sidewalks and pedestrian pathways.

5.J.8

Support the county's Safe Routes to School program.

5.J.9

Use public service campaigns to heighten motorists' awareness of bicyclists and pedestrians' rights and responsibilities.

5.J.10

Seek funding to implement the Event, Campaign and Mode Shift programs identified in the Walk Bike Clackamas Plan.

5.J.11

Support bicycle and pedestrian projects that improve access to public transit stops and provide connections to significant local destinations.

5.K Design Policies

5.K.1

Require bikeways and pedestrian facilities for all new roadway construction or substantial reconstruction, allowing for flexibility to accommodate characteristics of terrain, scenic qualities, existing development, and environmental constraints.

5.K.2

Design and implement innovative bicycle and pedestrian facilities that improve the convenience and safety of these facilities. Use facility types described in the Walk Bike Clackamas Plan and National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Street Design Guide as a reference.

5.K.3

Review development plans to ensure that they provide bicycle and pedestrian access.

5.K.4

Identify locations along high traffic and high-speed streets where the existing bicycle facility is not protected or separated, or parallel facilities do not exist. Plan for a transition to protected or separated facility in these locations.

5.K.5

Urban Identify and implement a network of low automobile traffic volume Shared Streets that are appropriate for posted speed reduction and signing as shared pedestrian and bicycle routes to enhance safety and connectivity and to supplement the system of sidewalks and bikeways found on the major street system.

5.K.6

Urban Identify pedestrian facilities and bikeway improvements necessary to ensure direct and continuous networks of pedestrian facilities and bikeways on the county road system.

5.K.7

Urban Identify locations where bicycle and pedestrian access is blocked by rivers and other natural barriers and encourage the creation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities to extend across these barriers.

5.K.8

Urban Create a networked system of pedestrian facilities and bikeways connecting cities, neighborhoods, commercial areas, community centers, schools, recreational facilities, employment centers, other major destinations, regional and city bikeways and pedestrian facilities, and other transportation modes. Utilize separate accessways for pedestrian facilities and bikeways where street connections are impractical or unavailable.

5.K.9

Rural Support the safe movement of equestrians in rural areas.

5.L Construction Policies

5.L.1

Construct all pedestrian facilities, bikeways, and multi-use paths according to the current County design standards and to the applicable cross section, allowing for flexibility to accommodate characteristics of terrain, scenic qualities, existing development, and environmental constraints, and different designs identified in adopted Special Transportation Plans.

5.L.2

Construct all pedestrian facilities, bikeways, and multi-use paths designated on the Planned Bikeway Network (Maps 5-2a and 5-2b); the Essential Pedestrian Network (Map 5-3); and the Active Transportation Plan (Maps 5-12a and 5-12b).

5.L.3

Construct interim pedestrian facilities and bikeways, as appropriate, on existing streets that are not built to the applicable cross section and where the construction of full street improvements is not practicable or imminent as determined by the County Planning Director and County Road Official or County Engineer.

5.L.4

Where possible enhance or add bikeway facilities during road resurfacing, re-striping and maintenance projects.

5.L.5

Urban Require that new development include construction of walkways and accessways within the development and between adjacent developments, where appropriate.

5.L.5

Rural In Unincorporated Communities, construct walkways adjacent to or within areas of development (such as schools, businesses, or employment centers) and at rural transit stops.

5.M Facilities Policies

5.M.1

Encourage the provision of appropriate, supportive facilities and services for bicyclists, including showers, lockers, bike racks on buses, bike repair stations, maintenance information/clinics, charging stations for e-bikes and secure parking.

5.M.2

Establish and maintain way-finding signage in both the urban and rural areas to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel.

5.M.3

Install and maintain the signage and bicycle amenities identified in the Active Transportation Plan.

5.M.4

Urban Encourage the provision of street lighting to increase the visibility and personal security of pedestrians and bicyclists.

5.N Multi-Use Path Policies

5.N.1

Support acquisition and development of multi-use paths on abandoned public and private rights-of-way.

5.N.2

Collaborate with the appropriate service providers, such as park providers, to plan for multi-use paths that accommodate equestrian facilities where possible.

5.N.3

Rural Consider multi-use paths where travel lanes or wide paved shoulders along roadways may not provide adequate safety for pedestrians or bicyclists.

5.N.4

Rural Consider equestrian uses when designing and constructing multi-use paths. Work with local communities and interest groups to plan, develop and maintain multi-use paths that also provide equestrian features. Plan for parking areas at such multi-use paths that support parking needs of equestrians, as well as needs of other path users.

5.N.5

Rural Establish a program to plan, develop, and maintain multi-use paths in the rural part of the County.

Roadways

The County's road system permits the movement of goods and people between communities and regions, using any of a variety of modes of travel. Roads provide access to virtually all property. They support established communities and serve new development. They connect rural communities and urban neighborhoods. Roads give structure to our urban form, define our commuting patterns and influence our perceptions of what is far away or close at hand.

Creating and maintaining a safe, continuous County-wide road system, which accommodates movement by all travel modes, means setting standards for development of new roads and redevelopment of existing roads, including design and access standards for urban and rural roads. To ensure roads continue to meet the transportation demands of the County, a method to measure the ongoing performance of the system is essential. In response to new technologies and financial constraints, recent changes have been made to these standards on the state and regional levels. These changes are reflected in this TSP.

5.O Functional Classification and Design Policies

5.O.1

Designate and develop roadways according to the functional classifications and guidelines illustrated in the County Road Typical Cross Sections (Figures 5-1a through 5-1f, and Figures 5-2a through 5-2f) while allowing flexibility to accommodate characteristics of terrain, scenic qualities, environmental constraints, existing development, and adopted Special Transportation Plans.

5.O.2

Designate freeways, arterials, collectors and connectors as shown on Map 5-4a and Map 5-4b. Roadways that do not presently exist but are shown on these maps are shown in approximate locations.

5.O.3

Maintain and improve roads consistent with their functional classification, and reclassify roads as appropriate to reflect function and use.

5.O.4

Develop and implement traffic calming strategies, appropriate for the road functional classification, that will improve the safety and convenience of travel by all modes, particularly in areas with high crash rates or high rates of bicycle and/or pedestrian activity.

5.O.5

Urban Consider the Metro Regional Street Design Classifications when designing new county roads or redesigning existing county roads, prior to construction or reconstruction. Map 5-5 shows which roads are designated by each Design Classification.

5.O.6

Urban Minimize impacts of managing storm water by allowing for Metro's alternative street standards, such as "green streets," as design alternatives.

5.O.7

Urban Design arterials and collectors to allow safe and convenient passage of buses, bicycles, and pedestrians.

5.O.8

Urban Streets, alleys, bikeways, pedestrian facilities, multi-use paths, trails and transit stops are allowed uses in all urban zoning districts. Consider all state and County policies relating to these facilities when widening, improving or constructing new transportation infrastructure.

5.O.9

Rural Plan to support the existing development pattern and through traffic needs of the rural communities, and not to support or promote urbanization.

5.O.10

Rural Consistent with ORS 215.283(3) and OAR 660, Division 12, County road capital improvement projects may be designed and constructed to improve safety and bring roads up to county standards outside the UGB. If the road capital improvement project is not otherwise allowed and would require expansion of right-of-way exceeding the road improvements allowed in the Agriculture or Forest districts, a goal exception would be required for such a project, as provided for in ORS 215.283(3).

5.O.11

Rural Streets, alleys, bikeways, pedestrian facilities, multi-use paths, trails and transit stops are allowed uses in all rural zoning districts with the exception of Agricultural and Forest Districts in which they are conditionally allowed by ORS 215.213, 215.283 or OAR Chapter 660, Division 6 (Forest Lands).

5.O.12

Rural Recognize the importance of resource-related uses such as agriculture and forestry to the local economy, and the need to maintain a transportation system that provides opportunities to harvest agricultural and forest products and deliver them to market.

5.O.13

Rural Design, construct and reconstruct rural arterials and collectors to allow safe and convenient passage of trucks, buses, pedestrians and bicyclists.

5.O.14

Rural Support the safe movement of agricultural equipment in rural areas by improving existing roads to county standards and considering design features such as signs, pull-outs for slow-moving vehicles, reduced speeds, and limiting curbs where equipment may move to the shoulder or out of the right-of-way.

5.P Project Development Policies

5.P.1

Before building new roads or adding capacity to existing roads, consider Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies for using the existing road system, including associated pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and system capacity most efficiently.

TSM strategies include:

  • Access Management;
  • Alternative/Modified Standards (Performance and/or Design Standards);
  • Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) applications;
  • Operational Improvements;
  • Parking Standards;
  • Enhanced Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities; and,
  • Road Diet (For example, restriping a low volume, 4-lane road to a 3-lane configuration with bicycle and pedestrian facilities).

5.Q Access Standard Policies

5.Q.1

Ensure safe and convenient access for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users for land uses that are open to the public. Apply access management in a flexible manner to allow reasonable access and balance the needs of all roadway users.

5.Q.2

Improve multimodal operations and safety by ensuring that Interchange Management Areas and other access plans and projects are coordinated with multimodal connectivity standards and are designed to support safe and convenient access and travel for all modes, when appropriate.

5.Q.3

Support the implementation of state access management standards (OAR Chapter 734, Division 51, as amended, and the Oregon Highway Plan) on state highway facilities and within Interchange Management Areas. Coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation for access control on state highways.

5.Q.4

If feasible, allow only collectors, connectors, or other arterials to intersect arterials.

5.Q.5

Access Standards shall be implemented through the Zoning and Development Ordinance and the County Roadway Standards. Where access management standards are adopted by the County in Special Transportation Plans, those standards shall apply.

5.Q.6

Developments should be designed to place driveway accesses on streets with the lowest functional classification or the lowest traffic volume.

5.R Policies on Improvements to Serve Development

5.R.1

Require new development to be served by adequate transportation facilities and access points that are designed and constructed to safely accommodate all modes of travel.

5.R.2

For new developments and land divisions, require right-of-way dedication, on-site frontage improvements to the applicable standards as shown in the roadway Cross Sections (Figures 5-1a through 5-1f and Figures 5-2a through 5-2f) and the County Roadway Standards, and off-site improvements necessary to safely handle expected traffic generated by the development and travel by active modes. Where roadway standards are adopted by the County in Special Transportation Plans, those standards shall apply.

5.R.3

Assess anticipated off-site traffic impacts caused by new developments. The developer may be required to participate financially or otherwise in the provision of off-site improvements, dedications or other requirements.

5.R.4

For new development proposed on a site identified on Map 5-6 (Potentially Buildable Residential Sites >5 Acres in UGB), require a conceptual street plan that is consistent with requirements of this section and provides for full street connections at intervals of no more than 530 feet, where feasible.

5.R.5

Require new development that will require construction of new streets to provide full street connections at intervals of no more than 530 feet, where feasible. If full street connections are not feasible at such intervals, require accessways for pedestrians, bicyclists or emergency vehicles at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Exceptions may be made where there are barriers, including topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing development, existing easements, or environmental constraints such as streams and wetlands.

5.R.6

New development shall accommodate on-site traffic circulation within the boundaries of the site, not by circulating vehicles on and off the site through multiple access points using the public road system. Internal circulation plans should avoid relying on "backing out" maneuvers for new driveways onto all rural arterials and collectors.

5.R.7

Urban Require implementation of a road network for undeveloped sites illustrated on Map 5-6. Existing roads shall be extended to provide a direct, connected system.

5.R.8

Urban Where appropriate, develop and implement neighborhood traffic circulation plans for all modes intended to improve circulation while minimizing safety concerns and exposure to air and noise pollution.

5.R.9

Urban Discourage motor vehicle through-trips on local, connector and collector roads, and encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel on these roads.

5.R.10

Urban Allow flexible criteria and standards for local streets that are less than 200 feet in length, are expected to carry very low traffic volumes, and are not capable of being extended.

5.R.11

Urban Private streets may be appropriate in areas with topographic constraints that make construction of a road to County standards not feasible. Private roads are not classified as local roads and are not maintained by the County.

5.R.12

Rural Discourage through trips on rural local roadways.

5.S System Performance Policies

5.S.1

For County roads, evaluate transportation system performance and the impact of new development. Use the evaluation methodology in the County Roadway Standards.

5.S.2

Evaluate motor vehicle capacity needs for roadways within the urban area using the standards shown in Table 5-2a, except as established below.

Table 5-2a
Motor Vehicle Capacity Evaluation Standards for the Urban Area
Weekday Mid-day and Weekday PM Peak Periods

Maximum Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio

ODOT Roadways and IntersectionsMid-day One-Hour Peak1st Hour, PM Peak2nd Hour, PM Peak
OR 99E from OR 224 interchange north to county line
OR 213 within the Clackamas Regional Center and the Fuller Road Station Community
0.991.10.99
I-205,  I-5, OR 212, OR 224, OR 2130.900.990.99
County Roadways and Intersections by Metro Urban Design Type, See Map 4–8Mid-day One-Hour Peak1st Hour, PM Peak1st Hour, PM Peak
Regional Centers, Town Centers; Main Streets, Station Communities0.991.10.99
Corridors, Neighborhoods, Employment Areas, Industrial Areas, Regionally Significant Industrial Areas, and All Other Areas Outside of City Limits0.900.990.99

5.S.3

Exceptions to the motor vehicle capacity evaluation standards for review of development proposed on property within Metro's boundary are established as follows:

5.S.3.1 Within the Clackamas Industrial Area, no motor vehicle capacity evaluation standards shall apply.

5.S.3.2 For the intersections of SE Park Avenue/OR 99E, SE Park Avenue/SE Oatfield Road, and SE Park Avenue/SE 27th Street, motor vehicle capacity evaluation standards of the Station Community Design Type shall apply.

5.S.4

Evaluate motor vehicle capacity needs for roadways in the rural area using the standards shown in Table 5-2b.

Table 5-2b
Motor Vehicle Capacity Evaluation Standards for the Rural Area 
Weekday, AM and PM Peak Periods

Maximum Volume to Capacity (V/C) Ratio

ODOT Roadways and Intersections (based on posted speed and highway classification)11st Hour, PM Peak Period2nd Hour, PM Peak Period
Unincorporated areas inside city UGBs0.80 to 0.950.80 to 0.95
Inside Unincorporated Communities0.70 to 0.800.70 to 0.80
All other rural areas0.70 to 0.750.70 to 0.75

Minimum Level of Service (LOS) or Maximum Volume/Capacity Ratio; Weekday Peak Periods

County Roadways and Intersections outside of CitiesAM Peak HourPM Peak Hour
Road segments and  unsignalized intersectionsLOS ELOS E
Signalized and roundabout intersections0.900.90

1 See Oregon Highway Plan for details.

5.S.5

Exception to the motor vehicle capacity evaluation standards for review of development proposed on property in the rural area is established as follows:

5.S.5.1 Within Government Camp Village, no motor vehicle capacity evaluation standards shall apply.

5.S.6

The maximum volume to capacity ratio for the ramp terminals of interchange ramps shall be v/c 0.85. (1999 Oregon Highway Plan, OHP Policy 1F Revisions, Adopted by OTC: Dec. 21, 2011).

5.S.7

Where more than one motor vehicle capacity standard would apply at an intersection, the standard allowing the higher level of congestion will be used, except for ramp terminal intersections.

Transit

Public transit service is essential for the mobility of many County residents, and provides an affordable option for others who prefer to use it. The County contains five major public transportation systems. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet), the state's largest transit provider, serves generally the western, more urbanized part of the county. The County also is home to four rural transit providers: South Clackamas Transportation District (SCTD) serving the Molalla area, Sandy Area Metro (SAM), Canby Area Transit (CAT) and Wilsonville's South Metro Area Transit (SMART). Clackamas County also directly supports the Mountain Express service which provides public transit to the Hoodland area along the Highway 26 corridor east of the City of Sandy. All of these services provide public transit as well as specialized services for seniors and persons with disabilities (paratransit) as mandated by the American with Disabilities Act.

Clackamas County participates in the development and implementation of the Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan which addresses the services available to vulnerable populations throughout the Portland metropolitan area.

The County can influence the type of service provided and the way new developments interface with transit and provide amenities for transit riders. Busses operated by the six districts, as well as each of the school districts in the county must safely share the county's roads with all other users.

5.T Transit Policies

5.T.1

Work with transit agencies to identify existing transit deficiencies in the County, needed improvements, and additional park-and-ride lots needed to increase the accessibility of transit services to all potential users.

5.T.2

Emphasize corridor or roadway improvements that help ensure reliable and on-time transit service in the County.

5.T.3

Encourage transit providers to restructure transit service to efficiently serve local as well as regional needs.

5.T.4

Emphasize transit improvements that improve east-west connections; improve service between the County's industrial and commercial areas and neighborhoods; and best meet the needs of all County residents, employees and employers, regardless of race, age, ability, income level and geographic location.

5.T.5

Coordinate with all applicable transit agencies on all new residential, commercial and industrial developments to ensure appropriate integration of transit facilities and pedestrian access to transit facilities.

5.T.6

Require major developments and road construction projects along transit routes to include provisions for transit shelters, pedestrian access to transit and/or bus turnouts, where appropriate.

5.T.7

Promote park-and-ride lots, transit shelters and pedestrian/bikeway connections to transit. Coordinate the location of these facilities with other land uses to promote shared parking and bicycle/ pedestrian-oriented transit nodes.

5.T.8

Coordinate and cooperate with transit agencies to provide transportation for seniors, people with disabilities, and other transportation-disadvantaged populations. Provide continued support for paratransit services as required within a three-quarter-mile distance from fixed-route transit stops.

5.T.9

Coordinate transit-supportive, roadway improvements with transit providers to ensure financing and implementation of such improvements.

5.T.10

Urban Require pedestrian and transit-supportive features and amenities and direct access to transit for new development.

Pedestrian and transit supportive amenities may include pedestrian/bikeway facilities, street trees, outdoor lighting and seating, landscaping, shelters, kiosks, strict standards for signs, and visually aesthetic shapes, textures and colors. Buildings measuring more than 100 feet along the side facing the major pedestrian/transit access should have more than one pedestrian entrance. Pedestrian access should be provided to connect transit centers or transit stops on bus routes with centers of employment, shopping or medium-to-high density residential areas within one-quarter mile of these routes.

5.T.11

Urban Coordinate with transit providers to achieve the goal of transit service within one-quarter mile of most residences and businesses within the Portland Metropolitan UGB. Support more frequent service within Regional Centers, Town Centers, Station Communities, and Corridors and Main Streets.

5.T.12

Urban Work with federal, state and regional agencies to implement high-capacity transit in the regional High-Capacity Transit (HCT) System Plan in order to help relieve traffic congestion, provide for transportation alternatives to the automobile, and promote the County's economy. See Map 5-8c for the HCT network in the County.

5.T.13

Urban Site new commercial, institutional, and multi-family buildings at major transit stops as close as possible to transit, with a door facing the transit street or side street, and with no parking between the building and front lot lines.

5.T.14

Rural Focus safety improvements near existing or planned transit stops.

Freight, Rail, Air, Pipeline and Water Transportation

In 2009, Clackamas County adopted "Open for Business – Economic Development Plan (EDP)." This plan provides a comprehensive guiding policy document for the County to improve, diversify and grow the economy in Clackamas County. Crucial to economic development is the infrastructure that supports the businesses and the employees that work in those businesses. Specific goals and actions called out by the Economic Development Plan include:

  • Maintain mobility for people and freight in the face of expected growth; and
  • Respond to the opportunities and challenges faced by its cities and rural areas, and support them in their efforts to develop quality jobs and businesses,

Freight, rail, air, pipelines and water transportation make significant contributions to the movement of people and goods; improve the quality of life; and support economic development in Clackamas County.

Policies relating to the movement of freight via roads, rail, air, pipelines or water transportation must also respond to new regulations to ensure the highest level of safety.

5.U General Freight Policies

5.U.1

Coordinate the planning, development, maintenance and operation of a safe and efficient freight system for all freight modes in Clackamas County with the private sector, ODOT, Metro, the Port of Portland and the cities of Clackamas County.

5.U.2

Promote an inter-modal freight transportation strategy and work to improve multi-modal connections among rail, industrial areas, airports and regional roadways to promote efficient movement of people, materials, and goods.

5.U.3

Work with the private transportation industry, Oregon Economic Development Department, Port of Portland and others to identify and realize investment opportunities that enhance freight mobility and support the County, regional and state economy.

5.U.4

Make freight investments that, in coordination with the County's economic development strategies, help retain and grow the County's job base and strengthen the County's overall economy.

5.U.5

Ensure that freight rail lines and truck routes do not have disproportionately negative impacts on sensitive land uses (places where people with increased risk of adverse impacts from exposure to noise and air pollution are likely to gather, such as schools, senior centers, hospitals, parks, housing). Prioritize mitigation efforts for current sensitive land use areas near freight rail lines and truck routes. Mitigate impacts to sensitive land uses by using vegetative buffers, establishing rail "quiet zones," and coordinating land use plans.

5.V Freight Trucking Policies

5.V.1

Support the Truck Freight Route System, while not prohibiting the use of other roads for local pickup and delivery of goods and services. (See Maps 5-9a and 5-9b).

5.V.2

Improve and maintain the countywide Truck Freight Route System, the Regional Transportation Plan Freight Routes and Oregon Freight Plan Routes, as shown on Maps 5-9a and 5-9b.

5.V.3

Consider Heavy and Oversize Freight Movement requirements on State and County facilities when developing plans for transportation improvements and land use changes along freight routes designated as ORS 366.215 Corridors, as shown on Maps 5-9c and 5-9d.

5.V.4

Consider the safety of all travel modes that use the Truck Freight Route System when designing improvements to this system.

5.V.5

Accommodate freight travel on the Truck Freight Route System by improving facility design and operations.

5.V.6

Identify street improvements to reduce delays and to improve travel time reliability on roadways in the Truck Freight Route system

5.V.7

Work to improve the safety of Truck Freight Routes for all transportation modes.

5.V.8

Support the development of truck layover facilities/staging areas to reduce the conflicts between parked vehicles and adjoining land uses.

5.V.9

Utilize Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) solutions to improve safety and operations of freight movement.

5.W Rail Policies

5.W.1

Support the safe and efficient movement of goods by rail.

5.W.2

Support the reduction of the number of at-grade crossings of arterial and collector streets on main rail lines to reduce conflicts between rail use and other transportation modes, and improve safety.

5.W.3

On new or reconstructed arterials and urban collectors, prohibit at-grade crossings of main rail lines without traffic restrictive safety devices.

5.W.4

Support expansion and maintenance needed to establish reliable, higher speed (110-125 mph) freight rail service and intercity rail passenger service in the Willamette Valley.

5.W.5

Encourage the development of rail-accessible land uses within industrial areas adjacent to main rail lines.

5.W.6

Support the development of convenient inter-modal facilities such as ramp, terminal and reload facilities for transfers from truck to rail for long-haul freight movement.

5.W.7

Improve the safety and operations of rail transport at at-grade rail crossings and ensure that all at-grade crossings meet the best practices for facilitating safe, multi-modal crossings, as identified in the most recent version of the "Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook" (Federal Highway Administration [FHWA]).

5.W.8

Identify and protect existing and abandoned rail rights-of-way for future transportation facilities and services.

5.X Airport Policies

5.X.1

Coordinate with the Port of Portland, the Oregon Department of Aviation, and other affected agencies to implement the Mulino Airport Plan.

5.X.2

Coordinate with Marion County, the City of Wilsonville, the Oregon Department of Aviation, and other affected agencies to develop and implement the Aurora Airport Plan.

5.X.3

Allow new airports as conditional uses in appropriate zoning districts. Require new public use airports to be located within:

one mile of an arterial roadway, and

at least one mile away from urban residential areas.

5.X.4

Cooperate with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Aviation and Federal Aviation Administration to minimize conflicts between airports and uses of surrounding lands.

5.X.5

Require that new airports, airport expansions, or expansions of airport boundaries, except those limited to use by ultra-lights and helicopters, have a runway at least 1,800 feet long and control at least enough property at the end of each runway through ownership, aviation easement, or long-term lease to protect their approach surfaces until the approach surfaces are 50 feet above the terrain. Require the runway to be located so as to achieve at least a 20-foot clearance of the approach surface over a county, city or public road.

5.X.6

Apply a Public-Use Airport and Safety overlay zoning district to public-use airports, consistent with ORS 836.600 through 836.630, and as shown on Map 5-10.

5.X.7

Apply a Private-Use Airport and Safety overlay zoning district to privately-owned, private-use airports that served as the base for three or more aircraft, consistent with ORS 836.600 through 836.630, and as shown on Map 5-10.

5.X.8

Recognize privately-owned, private-use airports that served as the base for one or two aircraft on December 31, 1994, as shown in the records of the Oregon Department of Transportation and as shown on Map 5-10.

5.X.9

Encourage establishment of heliports in industrial areas in conjunction with state and federal standards for heliport design and location.

5.X.10

Support the role Clackamas County airports serve in supporting emergency response and disaster assistance.

5.Y Pipeline Policy

5.Y.1

Work with state and federal regulatory agencies, affected communities and pipeline companies to provide safe, quiet, environmentally sensitive, and efficient transport of bulk commodities.

5.Z Water Transportation Policies

5.Z.1

Maintain safe and convenient, multi-modal land access to the Canby ferry, and to public and commercial docks and boat ramps

5.Z.2

Support efforts to minimize noise and negative impacts caused by river transportation on air and water quality and to habitat for fish migration.

5.Z.3

Support the continued operation and maintenance of the Willamette Falls Locks to facilitate water transportation on the Willamette River.

Finance and Funding

The vast majority of surface transportation funding in the United States is derived from public sources at the federal, state, and local levels and primarily includes gas and vehicle taxes and fees. For a variety of reasons, including more efficient vehicles, trends toward shortening commutes or carpooling, and a general unwillingness to raise gas tax rates, jurisdictions across the nation are facing decreasing levels of available funding for transportation projects. That, combined with rising construction costs, leads to increasing challenges in finding available funds for all the improvements that are needed to the transportation system.

One way to control costs is to spend wisely by focusing on using and maintaining the transportation systems that exist. The County also is committed to identifying and pursuing potential new funding sources for transportation improvements.

5.AA General Finance and Funding Policies

5.AA.1

Support continuation of current (or equivalent) federal, state, and local funding mechanisms to construct and maintain County transportation projects. Identify and pursue new, permanent funding mechanisms to construct and maintain County transportation facilities and to support programs and projects identified in the TSP.

5.AA.2

Seek dedicated funding sources to implement active transportation projects.

5.AA.3

Establish funding for bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects that serve the needs of transportation disadvantaged populations.

5.AA.4

Consider a transportation system development charge methodology that calculates person trips to allow pedestrian, transit, and bicycle projects, as well as motor vehicle projects, to be funded by TSDCs.

5.AA.5

To the extent practical, invest unrestricted funding sources in a balanced manner between rural and urban areas.

5.AA.6

Urban Study creating a transportation facility funding program that establishes a "fee in lieu of" process that may be used by developers to pay for all on-site and off-site transportation facilities required as part of the land development process.

5.BB

Maintenance Policies

5.BB.1

Emphasize maintenance of existing rights-of-way, with improvements where appropriate, to improve traffic flow and safety for all transportation modes at a reasonable cost.

5.BB.2

Determine road maintenance needs and priorities and develop an effective and efficient road maintenance program.

5.BB.3

Develop routine maintenance standards and practices for the transportation system, including traffic control devices.

Transportation Projects and Plans

The County's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes a 20-year plan for needed transportation improvements and the 5-year programmed projects. The CIP was developed through concentrated and intense scrutiny by County staff and several advisory groups.   Needed transportation projects were reviewed and analyzed with respect to how the transportation system is expected to function in 2035; how well each reflected the TSP vision and goals; and based on feedback from the public and several advisory committees. The Public Advisory Committee (PAC) developed the final recommendation to the Planning Commission on the project prioritization.

The purpose of the project prioritization was to identify a set of project that could reasonably be expected to be funded over the next 20 years. The funding forecast completed in 2012 indicates that only around 15% of the funding will be available to construct the needed projects. Therefore, the Capital Improvement Plan is divided into three project lists:

  • 20-Year Capital Projects: contains the prioritized list of needed transportation projects that can reasonably be undertaken given the current estimates of available funding.
  • Preferred Capital Projects: contains a second group of needed, prioritized transportation projects that the County would undertake if additional funding becomes available during the next 20 years.
  • Long-Term Capital Projects: contains the remainder of the needed transportation projects. Although these projects will be needed to meet the transportation needs of the County in the next 20 years, they are not expected to be funded or constructed by the County.

The CIP will be updated as needed, and additional studies will be completed to optimize the work completed in this TSP by finding new ways to address known problems that cannot be solved by the current CIP. Special Transportation Plans include policy recommendations for a specific geographic areas or transportation facilities within the County Where conflicts exist between provisions of Special Transportation Plans and provisions of Chapter 5, provisions in the Special Transportation Plans take precedence.

5.CC Capital Improvement Plan Policies

5.CC.1

Fund and build the transportation improvement projects identified as needed to accommodate and appropriately manage future transportation needs. These projects are found in the following lists: 20-Year Capital Projects (Table 5-3a); Preferred Capital Projects (Table 5-3b); and Long-Term Capital Projects (Table 5-3c). Project locations are shown on Maps 5-11a through 5-11f.

5.CC.2

Maintain a current and complete 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which contains the programmed transportation projects in priority order, with estimated costs and assigned responsibility for funding. Update and adopt the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program periodically.

5.CC.3

Support the construction of prioritized, major transportation improvements in the County as identified by other jurisdictions including the Oregon Department of Transportation, Metro, cities, transit agencies and park providers. The list of needed transportation projects to be built by other jurisdictions is located in Table 5-3d. The project locations are shown on Maps 5-11a through 5-11f.

5.DD Special Transportation Plans and Studies

5.DD.1

Designate the following as Special Transportation Plans:

  • The SE 172nd Avenue/190th Drive Corridor Management Plan, adopted by reference in Appendix A;
  • The Walk Bike Clackamas Plan, adopted by reference in Appendix A
  • The Clackamas County Airport Plan, adopted by reference in Appendix A;
  • Transportation elements of the Community Plans and Design Plans included in Chapter 10;
  • The Exception to Statewide Planning Goal 3 (Agricultural Lands), Goal 11 (Public Facilities & Services) and Goal 14 (Urbanization), pursuant to OAR 660, Division 12, to allow for the Arndt Road improvement, which is substantially complete; (For findings of fact and statement of reasons, see Board Order 2003-76.)
  • The Exception to Statewide Planning Goal 3 (Agricultural Lands), Goal 11 (Public Facilities & Services) and Goal 14 (Urbanization), pursuant to OAR 660, Division 12, to allow for the Arndt Road improvement listed as project number 2029 on Table 5-3b and shown on Map 5-11e; (For findings of fact and statement of reasons, see Board Order 2003-104.)
  • The Clackamas County Active Transportation Plan, adopted by reference in Appendix A; and
  • The Clackamas Regional Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Plan, adopted by reference in Appendix A.

5.DD.2

Complete the following studies to develop solutions to previously identified problems.

5.DD.2.1 Conduct an alternatives analysis and land use study to identify and consider roadway improvements to address access to I-5 within the southwest portion of the County and capacity deficiencies along Arndt Road (project #1106).

5.DD.2.2 For the urban unincorporated area, develop a study to identify potential pedestrian, bicycle, and safety performance standards for use during development review.  

5.DD.2.3 Develop a circulation study for the area west of the Clackamas Town Center and conduct a Transportation Infrastructure Analysis. (project #1018)

5.DD.2.4 Study the I-205 Multi-use Path gap to identify near term solutions for completing the path. (project #1026)

5.DD.2.5 Identify bicycle and pedestrian improvements to better connect OR 224 to the Clackamas Regional Center along 82nd Avenue. (project #1032)

5.DD.2.6 Work with ODOT and the City of Happy Valley to review the future need for the Sunrise Unit 2 (parallel to Highway 212, between 172nd Avenue and US 26), identified as a future, planned highway corridor.

5.DD.2.7 Work with ODOT, Metro, Oregon City, West Linn and any other affected jurisdiction to analyze and develop a solution to the transportation bottleneck on I-205 between Oregon City and the I-205 / Stafford Road Interchange. This process may include undertaking an Environmental Impact Statement to identify a preferred alternative that addresses the transportation congestion and facility operations issues on this portion of the I-205 corridor.

5.DD.2.8 Evaluate transitioning from transportation concurrency to safety analysis when a traffic impact study (TIS) is required of new development.

5.DD.2.9 Work with Metro and ODOT over five years to develop Alternate Road Capacity Performance Standards, required by Oregon Highway Plan Policy 1.F., to address the following five intersections. These intersections were forecast not to meet the capacity performance standards adopted in the 2013 TSP, and there were no projects identified that could make the intersections meet the standards.

  • SE Harmony Road/SE Linwood Avenue
  • OR 212/SE 172nd Avenue – ODOT Intersection
  • OR 212/SE 282nd Avenue – ODOT Intersection
  • OR 213/S. Henrici Road – ODOT Intersection (traffic signal or roundabout)
  • OR 224/SE Lake Road/SE Webster Road – ODOT Intersection
  •  

5.DD.2.10 Plan for an all-ages and abilities network of active transportation corridors that are comfortable for children and seniors. Such a network would involve a focus on safe and low-stress facilities such as protected bikeways; multi-use pathways that are physically separated from traffic on busy streets.

 

Definitions

The following definitions apply to usage within Chapter 5.

Airport, Private Use: An airport restricted, except for aircraft emergencies, to use by the owner and his invited guests. The determination as to whether an airport is private or public use is made by the Oregon Department of Aviation.

Airport, Public Use: An airport that is open to use by the flying public, with or without a request to use the airport.

Bikeway: A paved facility provided for use by cyclists. There are five categories of bikeways.

  • Shared Roadway: A type of bikeway where motorists and cyclists occupy the same roadway area. Shared lane markings should be provided in the roadway to designate the shared use of the roadway by bicyclists and motorists. On shared roadway facilities, bicyclists may use the full travel lane. Two types of shared roadway facilities are:
    • o Shared Streets: A bicycle and pedestrian facility whereby speed limits on local roads are reduced to 20 mph and bicycles and pedestrians share the roadway with vehicles. Additional elements may include pavement markings; signage; speed bumps and motor vehicle diversion..
    • o Advisory Lanes: A bicycle facility where the center travel lane is shared by two-way automobile traffic and shoulder bikeways or bike lanes are provided on each side of the center lane. Vehicles may use the shoulder bikeways/bike lanes for passing but must yield to bicyclists and oncoming motorists.
  • Shoulder Bikeway: A bikeway which accommodates cyclists on paved roadway shoulder.
  • Bike Lane: There are three types of bike lanes:
    • o Buffered Bike Lane: Bicycle lanes with a striped buffer providing greater separation from vehicles than a typical bike lane.
    • o Protected Bike Lane: Bicycle lanes parallel to the roadway and separated from traffic by a buffer as well as by a barrier such as a landscaped buffer, parked cars, or flexible bollards.
    • o Conventional Bike Lane: A section of roadway designated for exclusive bicycle use, at the same grade as the adjacent roadway.
  • Bike Path: A bike lane constructed entirely separate from the roadway.
  • Cycle Track: An exclusive "grade-separated" bike facility elevated above the street level using a low-profile curb and a distinctive pavement material. Two-way cycle tracks are physically separated cycle tracks that allow bicycle movement in both directions on one side of the road.

Communities of Interest: Black people, Indigenous people, and People of Color (BIPOC); immigrants; people with limited English proficiency; low-income and low-wealth community members; low-and-moderate-income renters and homeowners; people with disabilities; youth and seniors.

Functional Classification: The process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of traffic service that they are intended to provide. Functional classifications found in Clackamas County and typical characteristics of each classification follow:

  • Principal Arterials: (Freeway/Expressway and other designated Principal Arterials). Serves interregional and intraregional trips and carries heavy volume at high speed. Primarily Interstate Freeways and State Highways but also includes other roads designated as Principal Arterials. These roads make up the National Highway System.
  • Major Arterial: Carries local and through traffic to and from destinations outside local communities and connects cities and rural centers. Moderate to heavy volume; moderate to high speed.
  • Minor Arterial: Connects collectors to higher order roadways. Carries moderate volume at moderate speed.
  • Collector: Principal carrier within neighborhoods or single land use areas. Links neighborhoods with major activity centers, other neighborhoods, and arterials. Generally not for through traffic. Low to moderate volume; low to moderate speed.
  • Connector: Collects traffic from and distributes traffic to local streets within neighborhoods or industrial districts. Usually longer than local streets. Low traffic volumes and speeds. Primarily serves access and local circulation functions. Not for through traffic in urban areas.
  • Local: Provides access to abutting property and connects to higher order roads. New local roads should intersect collectors, connectors, or, if necessary, minor arterials. Not for through traffic.
  • Alley: May be public or private, to provide access to the rear of property. Alleys should intersect local roads or connectors. Not for through traffic

Level of service (LOS): A performance measure that represents quality of service of an intersection or roadway segment, measured on an A–F scale, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions from the traveler's perspective and LOS F the worst.

Major Transit Stop: A transit center, major bus stop, or light rail stop, as identified on Comprehensive Plan Map 5-8a, Transit, Urban.

Major Transit Street: A street with a Frequent Service Bus Line, as identified on Comprehensive Plan Map 5-8a, Transit, Urban; existing or planned High Capacity Transit, as identified on Comprehensive Plan Map 5-8c, High Capacity Transit (HCT) System Plan; or both.

Mode (also "travel mode"): A particular form of travel, for example, walking, bicycling, traveling by automobile, or traveling by bus.

Multi-use Path: A paved path built for bicycle and pedestrian traffic that is physically separated from motor vehicle traffic, and can be either within the road right-of-way or within an independent right-of-way.

Pedestrian Facilities: Sidewalks, pedestrian pathways, or other facilities that are designed specifically for pedestrian use, as identified by functional classification in cross sections (Figures 5-1 through 5-3) or as determined appropriate by the County Planning Director and the County Road Official or County Engineer.

Principal Active Transportation (PAT) Route: Priority routes for pedestrian and bikeway facilities which form the "spine" of the County active transportation network that have been identified in the Active Transportation Plan. PAT Routes provide connection to key county destinations, link rural and urban communities, and connect to Parkways and Bikeways as identified in the Metro Regional Active Transportation Plan. Specifics about the appropriate bikeway and/or pedestrian facility treatments for the PAT Routes are included in the Active Transportation Plan.

Trail: A hard- or soft-surfaced facility for pedestrians, bicyclists, or equestrians that is separate from vehicular traffic. Trails often go through natural areas and are designed to have a minimal impact on the natural environment.

Transportation Demand Management (TDM): Strategies to achieve efficiency in the transportation system by reducing demand.

Transportation Disadvantaged: Persons who, because of physical or mental disability, income status, or age, are unable to transport themselves or to purchase transportation and are, therefore, dependent upon others to obtain access to health care, employment, education, shopping, social activities, or other life-sustaining activities, or children who are handicapped or high-risk or at-risk.

Truck Freight Route System: A set of identified arterials, collectors and State facilities that support the efficient movement of goods throughout the County.

Road: A public or private way created to provide ingress to, or egress from, one or more lots, parcels, areas or tracts of land, or that provides for travel between places by vehicles. A private way created exclusively to provide ingress and egress to land in conjunction with a forest, farm or mining use is not a "road." The terms "street," "access drive" and "highway" for the purposes of this Plan shall be synonymous with the term "road."

Roadway: That portion of a road or alley that has been improved for vehicular and pedestrian traffic.

Rural: Areas that are either (a) outside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary and outside city limits, or (b) inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary and have a Comprehensive Plan designation of Agriculture, Forest, Rural, Rural Commercial, Rural Industrial or Unincorporated Community Residential.

Urban: Areas that are inside the Portland Metropolitan Urban Growth Boundary, except areas that have a Comprehensive Plan designation of Agriculture, Forest, Rural, Rural Commercial, Rural Industrial or Unincorporated Community Residential.

Volume-to-Capacity (v/c) Ratio: A volume-to-capacity ratio compares vehicle volumes (the roadway demand) with roadway supply (carrying capacity). Volume refers to the number of vehicles using a roadway at a specific time period (and length of time), while capacity is the road's ability to support that volume based on its design and number of lanes.

Last amended 7/17/2025

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Chapter 6: Housing

Housing stock within Clackamas County serves local communities and also ties into the regional supply. As such, many of the housing challenges currently facing the county are not unique to the local area and solutions must be considered within the context of regional and statewide trends, as well as county-wide needs. To move forward, we must also look back and acknowledge actions in the past that have harmed and excluded members of our community. Residential zoning has a complex history that resulted in exclusion of low-income, black, indigenous, and people of color from certain neighborhoods. In Oregon, this history was especially harmful with direct exclusion of non-white people from the state until 1926. Although those exclusions are illegal today, their negative impacts are still affecting our community through the legacy of exclusionary zoning. Housing policy and code changes are an opportunity to help mitigate effects of these past practices; housing policies moving forward must be more focused on equity, diversity, and inclusion.

Meeting the future housing needs and desires of residents will require the County to allow for new housing types and densities. A wider range of housing prices can be encouraged by providing a greater variety of lot sizesand more opportunities for the development of a range of housing sizes and types. Providing more opportunities for the development of multifamily dwellings and other alternative housing forms are needed to house the young, the elderly, and lower-income households who may prefer, or only be able to afford, housing types other than detached single-family homes. And as the current housing stock ages and redevelopment takes place, regulations pertaining to density, design and accessibility will shape neighborhoods and the county.

Housing Goals

  • Goal 1: Meet the needs of the County houseless population through a variety of short- and long-term options.
  • Goal 2: Encourage development that will provide a range of choices in housing type, density, and price throughout the County.
  • Goal 3: Provide housing opportunities that meet the economic, social, and cultural needs of community members while using energy, land, and public facilities as efficiently as possible.

Background and Issues

In response to growing concerns about increasing housing costs, increasing homelessness, and an historic lack of equity in housing policies, both the Oregon State Legislature and the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners (BCC) recently took action to address housing issues.

The Oregon State legislature took action to affect housing development in larger jurisdictions in the state. The two most notable bills affecting how the County regulates housing include:

  • Senate Bill 1051(2017), which requires jurisdictions to provide clear and objective standards for housing development, and to allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in areas zoned for detached housing inside urban growth boundaries; and
  • House Bill 2001(2019), which requires larger jurisdictions, including the County, to allow duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes, cottage clusters and townhouses ("middle housing") on urban lots zoned for a single-family home.

In 2018, the BCC appointed the Affordable Housing and Homelessness Task Force (Task Force) to research, recommend, and support, new policies and strategies to address housing affordability and homelessness in the County. The BCC also initiated the production of a countywide Housing Needs Analysis, which was completed in 2019 and compared expected housing demand with available land supply over 20 years.

The Task Force and the Housing Needs Analysis identified following as the top issues facing the county with respect to housing:

  • In the County, population growth is fueling strong demand for new housing units. Future housing needs will need to be accommodated in an urban area with a rapidly dwindling supply of residentially-zoned land.
  • Housing built in the County continues to be predominantly detached, single-family dwellings while the need for smaller units and multi-family units is increasing due to changing demographics in the county.
  • Housing is becoming increasingly less affordable.
  • The number of people experiencing houselessness is increasing.
  • Manufactured home parks continue to provide a valuable source of affordable housing, but face redevelopment pressures as land values and housing prices continue to increase.
  • It is essential to consider equity within housing policies. It has be demonstrated that housing cost burdens fall disproportionately on people of color and rates of homeownership are significantly lower for Hispanic and non-white households than for white households.
     

Creating housing opportunities that are safe, affordable, available, and accessible for all residents must be done within the context of federal, state, and regional regulations. The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning & Development Ordinance need to be responsive to new initiatives adopted by these regulatory agencies to ensure the development of sufficient and sustainable housing opportunities. The county's goals and policies to address housing have been created within this context and are intended to guide development of more equitable and diverse housing and neighborhoods in the county.

Housing Goal 1: Meet the needs of the County houseless population through a variety of short and long-term options.

Over the last several years, the cost of living has outpaced wage growth across the nation and in the County. As rent and homeownership become less affordable, the risk of becoming houseless increases. Meeting the needs of the county's houseless population will require coordination between several county departments to ensure that safe, affordable shelter place, as well as the services necessary to help the houseless transition to more permanent housing can be provided.

6.A Houselessness Policies

6.A.1 Support regional programs and the County's Public Housing Program as a means to provide more low- and moderate-income housing.

6.A.2 Give priority for relocation into public housing to low-income residents displaced by development.

6.A.3 Develop and support a full spectrum of shelter and housing options (e.g., emergency shelters, transitional shelters, and public housing) that assist individuals in moving from houselessness to stable, long-term housing solutions.

6.A.4 Collaborate with community partners to provide a continuum of supportive services and programs that address the needs of unhoused persons and families to assist in their transition to more permanent housing solutions.

6.A.5 Ensure the Zoning and Development Ordinance allows for places to develop temporary shelters, alternative shelter models, and other transitional housing types.

Housing Goal 2: Encourage development that will provide a range of choices in housing type, density, and price throughout the County.

Throughout the County, there is a need to have housing available where people live and work. Having a range of housing types and prices will help to alleviate the deficit of land that exists to accommodate the needed future housing supply.

6.B Housing Type Policies

6.B.1 Enable a range of housing types throughout the county in a range of zoning districts.

6.B.2 Allow for accessibility and universal design standards.

6.B.3 Allow middle housing in urban, low density residential areas.

6.B.4 Provide for higher-density, single-family development by planning for developments in smaller-lot zoning districts.

6.B.5. Encourage smaller lots by allowing for planned unit developments and middle housing developments.

6.B.6 Provide for increased capacity for multifamily development in the urban area.

6.B.7 Allow for the development of housing on existing legal lots that do not meet the current minimum lot size in a zoning district.

6.B.8 Support the continued existence of manufactured dwelling parks and require that parks shall not be redeveloped unless a plan for relocation of the existing tenants is submitted and approved prior to redevelopment.

6.B.9 Allow new manufactured home parks as a primary use in Medium Density Residential zoning districts, but not in designated commercial, industrial, or higher-density multifamily areas.

6.C Housing Affordability Policies

6.C.1 Encourage more affordable housing by allowing for a variety of housing densities and price ranges throughout the county.

6.C.2 Allow for rental units with a variety of size, location, and accessibility.

6.C.3 Enable more affordable pathways to home ownership.

6.C.4 Pursue subsidies to provide affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households.

6.C.5 Provide expedient, efficient design review, building permit, zoning, and subdivision processes.

6.C.6 Allow alternative road and improvement standards where appropriate (see the policies in the Roadways section of Chapter 5, Transportation System Plan).

6.C.7 Allow reduced utility and roadway costs through flexible lotting patterns in subdivisions and planned unit developments.

6.C.8 Allow density transfers to encourage the creation of less expensive lots (see the policies in Chapter 4, Land Use).

6.C.9 Allow, where appropriate, residential density bonuses for:

  • • Affordable housing units, developed either through a government-subsidized program or by the private sector
  • • Housing included as part of a mixed-use development
  • • Parks dedication
  • • Where special performance criteria have been met.

Housing Goal 3: Provide housing opportunities that meet the economic, social, and cultural needs of community members while using energy, land, and public facilities as efficiently as possible.

Economic, social, and cultural perspectives influence the aspects of the built environment that create welcoming and livable communities. The following policies are designed to address the livability of the County.

6.D Livability Policies

6.D.1 Encourage growth in areas where public services can be economically provided.

6.D.2. Support programs that help homeowners and renters to remain in their homes if redevelopment puts upward pressure on home costs and rents.

6.D.3 Consider housing choice, livability, and displacement when developing community plans.

6.D.4 Make use of existing urban service by allowing for infill development and providing for middle housing types when the existing home is retained.

6.D.5 Provide for a variety of middle housing opportunities that meet the design standards that apply in existing, urban residential neighborhoods.

6.D.6 Allow greater flexibility for duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes in the urban area.

6.D.7 Invest in active transportation systems to support livable neighborhoods (see the policies in the Roadways section of Chapter 5).

6.D.8 Encourage shared access to limit impervious surface and to promote efficient use of existing infrastructure and pedestrian safety.

6.D.9 Provide for buffers between residential areas and neighboring nonresidential land use.

6.D.10 Allow flexibility in residential setback requirements pursuant to adopted criteria to support a more uniform street frontage and the development of existing lots with unique circumstances.

6.D.11 Require design review approval for all multiple-family development, where appropriate.

6.D.12 Ensure design review considers the continued livability of existing neighborhoods by requiring design review address at least the following:

  • • Energy efficiency and conservation
  • • Access to transit
  • • Crime prevention including natural surveillance of public areas by residents
  • • Open space, including recreation areas and children's play areas
  • • Privacy considerations, including private entries, patios, and fencing
  • • Noise abatement
  • • Shared parking to reduce paved areas
  • • Accessibility of parking to units
  • • Pedestrian/bicycle facilities on and off site
  • • Minimization of impervious ground cover
  • • Retention of natural areas and features such as major trees
  • • Landscaping
  • • Screened parking areas.

Last Amended 9/5/23

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off

Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7: Public Facilitues and Services

The provision of public facilities and services is a key ingredient in the development of Clackamas County and the implementation of this Plan. All development requires a certain level of public facilities and services. The objective of this Plan element is to provide the level of public facilities and services to support the land use designations in this Plan, and to provide those facilities and services at the proper time to serve development in the most cost effective way.

This chapter addresses, in part, the requirements of the Land Conservation and Development Commission's (LCDC's) Goal 11, also known as Oregon Administrative Rule 660, Division 11. It requires planning for sanitary sewage treatment, water, storm drainage and transportation. Adequate levels of those public facilities and services must be available before urban levels of development can be built in a manner consistent with the land use designations in this Plan. (Transportation facilities and services are addressed in Chapter 5 of this Comprehensive Plan). Further detail, particularly with regard to necessary facility improvements and their costs, can be found in the County's Public Facilities Plan.

Failure to plan for public facilities properly could result in unnecessary financial costs, if the services are provided in excess of needed levels. Unnecessary environmental degradation and ultimately more financial cost could result if services are not properly designed to accommodate the anticipated level of development.

The public facilities and services policies of this Plan provide a logical framework for the timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of facilities and services required to meet the population and economic needs of this County. The following policies will be used to guide and coordinate the provision of future facilities and services with development activities in Clackamas County. Other policies that may pertain to public facilities and services are included in the Natural Resources, Transportation, and Land Use Chapters of this Plan.

Issues

Several critical issues stand out among the others when planning for the provision of new public facilities and services. These issues are:

  • The type of services provided,
  • The appropriate level of each service,
  • The arrangement or pattern of services,
  • The timing of the necessary services,
  • Who should provide the services,
  • Who should benefit from and pay for the necessary services,
  • The differential cost of providing services in different geographic areas.

Summary of Findings and Conclusion

Sanitary Sewage Treatment

  • Twenty different management agencies either collect, treat, plan or regulate existing sewage facilities serving the urban portions of Clackamas County.
  • The County's approved Sewerage Facilities Master Plan is the guiding planning document for the development and operation of wastewater facilities in Clackamas County.
  • Improving sewage facilities is highly capital intensive. Current rates and charges, including either user rates or system development charges, will likely need to be increased over the next twenty-year period to fund major capital improvement programs.
  • All future sanitary facilities must comply with federal, state and regional water quality goals and regulations.
  • Provision of sanitary facilities must be coordinated with other essential facilities and services.

Water

  • At present, a sufficient supply and source of drinking water exists to serve the projected urban population needs of Clackamas County.
  • The County Health Department has identified 232 public water districts serving four or more households.
  • The primary sources of water are Bull Run, Clackamas River, Molalla River and groundwater. Wilsonville has recently decided to use the Willamette River as a municipal water source.
  • Although the Clackamas River is an excellent source of water, there is a potential problem of "over-allocating" individual water rights relative to the available water supply.
  • Many purveyors will need to expand their in-system storage capacity to meet 20-year demands. This storage is needed to meet short-term emergency fire demands in excess of transmission facility capacity and peak demand.
  • Many of the smaller private purveyors have inadequate treatment systems and little storage capacity to meet 20-year demands.
  • Information concerning groundwater is incomplete. At present data are incomplete on quantities of groundwater withdrawn by private users. (See Natural Resources and Energy chapter, Groundwater Section.)
  • The Regional Water Providers Consortium provides a forum for water purveyors serving the urban areas of the County to discuss regional water issues, including revision of service areas. Final decisions regarding actual services will continue to be made by local service providers.

Storm Drainage

  • Storm drainage basin planning is substantially complete for the urban areas of Clackamas County using a 20-year planning period, and that planning is in process for Urban Reserves.
  • The County currently lacks a comprehensive stormwater system and lacks mechanisms for upgrading inadequate sections for the urban areas. The service providers are working on planning and building regional facilities for water quality and quantity.
  • The County has stormwater improvement requirements that include on-site detention and provide options for regional detention and the service providers are working on water quality requirements.
  • The Endangered Species Act and the listing of Steelhead and Salmon as threatened species are critical considerations in the formulation of surface water management policy.
  • Implementation of any storm drainage program requires a major financial investment. Federal and state revenue sources are insufficient to support major storm drainage improvements. Local methods of finance will be more heavily relied upon to develop storm drainage improvements.

Solid Waste

  • Disposal of solid waste materials is a regional problem necessitating a regional solution. Metro is the regional planning authority charged with the responsibility of overall planning, siting and management of solid waste disposal in the metropolitan area. Metro is also responsible for state-mandated recycling and recovery in the tri-county region.
  • Metro has made arrangements with a private firm to construct a new landfill in Arlington, Oregon to accept the region's solid wastes.
  • Solid Waste facilities in Clackamas County are the Metro South Transfer Station, Sandy Transfer Station and Mt. Hood Refuse Center, and the Canby Transfer and Recycling Station. The only mixed waste processing center in Clackamas County is KB Recycling, although other centers in adjacent Counties serve Clackamas County as well. Several yard debris processors and composting facilities are located in Clackamas County.
     

Fire and Emergency Medical

  • The level of fire safety in any community depends upon several factors, including: water supply and pressure, fire station staffing, condition of transportation routes, travel times, distance between vegetation and buildings, fire agency capabilities, and housing densities.
  • Nine fire districts provide fire and emergency medical services to the unincorporated portions of Clackamas County.
  • An intergovernmental agreement between the fire agencies and the County establishes one Fire Code for all agencies (implemented by the Building Department and at Development Review).
  • Each fire agency's response standard and its capabilities are established by its governing body and vary based on community taxpayer support.
  • Automatic and mutual assistance agreements exist countywide that address routine to catastrophic incident response, and are updated on a regular basis, or as needed under the auspices of the Clackamas Fire Defense Board.

Law Enforcement

  • Police services are provided by nine agencies in Clackamas County. Clackamas County's Sheriff's Department serves by far the largest geographic area including contractual patrol services to Happy Valley, Johnson City, Rivergrove, Wilsonville and Estacada.
  • The Sheriff's Department operates and maintains the only County jail facility, which is located on the Red Soils complex in Oregon City.
  • The County operates and maintains a radio system and dispatch facilities that provide communication services for the fire, emergency medical system, and law enforcement providers in the County. The cities of Lake Oswego and Gladstone maintain separate dispatch facilities for fire, emergency medical system, and police services. The City of Milwaukie provides its own police dispatch center.
    There is an "enhanced" 9-1-1 telephone system that serves all of Clackamas County.

Schools

  • Ten separate school districts operate 105 public primary and secondary schools in Clackamas County.
  • Coordination between the County Planning Division and school district administrations can be improved, particularly in reviewing new subdivisions and reviewing the location of additional school facilities. Due to state land use law, schools cannot be compensated for the impact of development, nor can the County limit development based on inadequate school capacity.

County Government

  • During the past decade, Clackamas County has experienced significant population growth, resulting in expanded levels of governmental services. As a consequence, the County has leased space in a number of locations. A Master Facility and Space Consolidation Plan should be implemented by the County.
  • Clackamas County, in its role of coordinator for public facilities as required by the Land Conservation and Development Commission's (LCDC's) Goal 11, has adopted a Public Facilities Plan for the North Clackamas Urban Area. It describes facilities for sanitary sewage treatment, storm drainage, public water, and transportation. It describes the existing facilities, future needs for 5-year and 20-year periods, the cost of meeting those needs, and the sources of funding expected to pay for the expansions.
     

Public Facilities

Clackamas County adopts as supporting documents to this Plan the public facilities plans titled, "Transportation Element", "Sanitary Sewerage Services", "Water Systems", and "Storm Drainage Element", including the public facility project titles contained therein. The public facility projects' locations or service areas are shown on maps contained within the above reports. Additional supporting documents are the master plans for Cow and Sieben Creeks, Kellogg/Mt. Scott Creek, and Rock and Richardson Creeks.

Public Faciliies Goals

  • Maintain and improve the quality of Clackamas County's streams, lakes, waterways and groundwater.
  • Provide for the location and development of sanitary sewage treatment, collection and reuse facilities to support existing and future land use development in all urban areas of the County.
  • Provide for the location and development of drinking water facilities to support existing and future land development.
  • Protect the quantity and quality of drinking water supplies.
  • Coordinate the location and size of drinking water facilities with appropriate water purveyors.
  • Minimize stormwater runoff, water pollution, siltation, soil erosion and flooding.
  • Improve fish habitat and support recovery of aquatic species.
  • Require adequate storm drainage, public sanitary sewer and public water service concurrent with development in areas that require these services.
  • Provide a systematic control for the collection, transport, storage, separation, processing, recycling, resource recovery and disposal of solid waste.
  • Minimize the impact on air, land and water quality and neighborhoods when siting sanitary landfills.

7.A Sanitary Sewage Treatment Policies

7.A.1 Recognize County responsibility for operating, planning and regulating wastewater systems as designated in the approved Sewerage Facilities Master Plan.

7.A.2 Recognize that Clackamas County Service District No. 1, Tri-City Service District, Oak Lodge Sanitary District, the Unified Sewerage Agency and the City of Portland have responsibility for operating, planning, and regulating wastewater systems as designated in the approved Sewerage Facilities Master Plan.

7.A.3 Require all agencies that provide sewer treatment and collection services in Clackamas County to be consistent with a DEQ approved Sewerage Facilities Master Plan.

7.A.4 Ensure that sewage facilities in Clackamas County are developed and maintained by the appropriate sanitary district, county service district or city.

7.A.5 Require, if necessary, provision of sanitary sewers prior to development in areas identified as "health hazards" by the State of Oregon.

7.A.6 Require sanitary sewage service agencies to coordinate extension of sanitary services with other key facilities, i.e., water, transportation, and storm drainage systems, which are necessary to serve additional lands.

7.A.7 Require the timely and orderly provision of sanitary sewers in all Immediate Urban areas except those identified as Floodplain and other hazard areas.

7.A.8 Prohibit new on-site sewage disposal systems within Urban Growth Boundaries except for:

7.A.8.1 A lot of record outside of a sewage service district, legally recorded prior to January 31, 1980; or

7.A.8.2 Parcels of ten acres or larger in Future Urban areas inside the Metro Urban Growth Boundary (UGB); or

7.A.8.3 Outside the Metro UGB on lots that conform to the minimum lot size of the zone; or

7.A.8.4 Parcels inside a sewage service district having unique topographic or other natural features that make sewer extension impractical as determined on a case by case basis by the sewer service provider.

7.A.9 Except as provided by the Oregon Revised Statutes for abandoned or diminished mill sites in "Rural" designated areas, and except as provided in OAR 660-011-0060(3), (4), (8), and (9) and consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 11, prohibit:

7.A.9.1 The establishment of new sewer systems, as defined in OAR 660-011-0060(1), outside urban growth boundaries or unincorporated communities;

7.A.9.2 The extension of sewer lines from within urban growth boundaries or unincorporated community boundaries in order to serve uses on land outside those boundaries;

7.A.9.3 The extension of sewer systems, as defined in OAR 660-011-0060(1), that currently serve land outside urban growth boundaries and unincorporated community boundaries in order to serve uses that are outside such boundaries and are not served by the system on July 28, 1998.

7.A.10 Allow sewerage systems in the Wildwood/Timberline, Zigzag Village, Rhododendron, Wemme/Welches, Government Camp and Boring Unincorporated Communities, provided such systems are not allowed to expand outside the boundaries of these communities, except as provided by the Oregon Revised Statutes for abandoned or diminished mill sites or as otherwise provided by Policies 7.A.9 or 7.A.11.

7.A.11 Allow DEQ approved sewage disposal systems in "Agricultural" and "Forest" designated areas if:

7.A.11.1 Necessary to alleviate a public health hazard or water pollution problem that has been identified by the State of Oregon.

7.A.11.2 Necessary for parks or recreation lands when consistent with the protection of forests and agriculture, or for housing necessary for the conduct of forest or agriculture related activities.

7.A.12 Coordinate the review of development applications with the appropriate sanitary sewer service provider to ensure that approval is not granted in the absence of adequate sanitary sewer facilities or a mechanism to provide them concurrently with development.

7.B Water Policies

7.B.1 Develop a Countywide program for domestic water source development.

7.B.2 Require all public water purveyors to design the extension of water facilities at levels consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan. Capacity suitable for fire protection needs to be included.

7.B.3 Require water purveyors in urban areas to coordinate the extension of water services with other key facilities, i.e., transportation, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage facilities, necessary to serve additional lands.

7.B.4 Encourage development in urban areas where adequate urban water facilities already exist.

7.B.5 Require water service purveyors to provide water services for non-urban areas at levels appropriate for non-urban use.

7.B.6 Coordinate the review of development applications with the appropriate water service provider to ensure that approval is not granted in the absence of adequate water facilities or a mechanism to provide them concurrently with development.

7.C Storm Drainage Policies

7.C.1 Require all new developments to meet the development standards of the appropriate service provider.

7.C.2 Require submission of storm drainage, water quality and erosion control plans prior to approval of all new development, and implementation of such plans.

7.C.3 Require that urban stormwater runoff be minimized by nonstructural controls, where feasible, to maintain the quality and quantity of runoff in natural drainage ways. These areas may be calculated as part of the required open space.

7.C.4 Require runoff from impervious surfaces to be collected and treated, as required by the appropriate service provider, prior to discharge to a natural drainage way capable of accepting the discharge.

7.C.5 Require control measures to minimize erosion and sedimentation during construction. The method of retention and control shall be approved by the appropriate service provider.

7.C.6 Stabilize drainage ways as necessary below drainage and culvert discharge points for a distance sufficient to minimize erosion created by the discharge.

7.C.7 Determine the responsibility for installation of storm drainage systems prior to final approval of all new developments.

7.C.8 Coordinate the review of development applications with the appropriate storm drainage service provider to ensure that approval is not granted in the absence of adequate storm drainage facilities or a mechanism to provide them concurrently with development.

7.D Solid Waste Policies

7.D.1 Coordinate with Metro in the proper siting and operation of solid waste facilities in Clackamas County.

7.D.2 Require future sanitary landfill sites to meet appropriate State and regional siting criteria and regulations.

7.D.3 Ensure that the operation of solid waste facilities and services is consistent with County Solid Waste and Waste Management Ordinances.

7.D.4 The guiding policy for waste management in the County should be based on the following priorities:

7.D.4.1 Reduce the amount of solid waste generated.

7.D.4.2 Reuse material for the purpose for which it was originally intended.

7.D.4.3 Recycle material that cannot be reused.

7.D.4.4 Compost material that cannot be reused or recycled.

7.D.4.5 Recover energy from solid waste that cannot be reused, recycled, or composted so long as the energy recovery facility preserves the quality of air, water, and land resources.

7.D.4.6 Dispose of, by landfilling, any solid waste that cannot be reused, recycled, composted or from which energy cannot be recovered.

7.E Street Lighting Policies

7.E.1 Encourage provision of street lighting for all new and existing developments inside the Urban Growth Boundary.

7.E.2 Outside urban growth boundaries, discourage installation of street lighting except in Unincorporated Communities and in subdivisions with lots of one acre or less. This policy is not intended to prevent installation of individual lights necessary for security or public safety.

Public Services

Public Services Goals

  • Support a sufficient level of fire safety and prevention in all areas of the County in order to minimize the risk of fire damage to the life and property of all residents.
  • Develop and maintain County law enforcement and correction services to provide safety to all County residents.
  • Coordinate proposed land use actions and Plan amendments with school districts.
  • Coordinate the location and size of future school sites with appropriate school districts.
  • Support school facilities as focal points of community activity subject to available funding and interest.
  • Locate County governmental facilities to maximize service to all County residents in the most cost efficient manner.

7.F Fire Policies

7.F.1 Facilitate coordination between fire districts and developers prior to approval of future development to insure appropriate levels of fire safety.

7.F.2 Encourage all public water purveyors to maintain a sufficient amount of water storage and pressure within the system to maintain minimum fire flow.

7.F.3 Coordinate with fire and water districts in locating fire hydrants in new development.

7.G Law Enforcement Policies

7.G.1 Encourage provision of the appropriate level of Sheriff services in urban and rural areas.

7.G.2 Review proposals for additional law enforcement and correction facilities to assure that such proposals are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and policies.

7.H Education Policies

7.H.1 Encourage maximum use of school facilities.

7.H.2 Support proposals that recommend using school facilities or portions of school facilities for senior citizen, day-care, or preschool age children activities.

7.H.3 Encourage development of portions of school property or adjacent property as neighborhood park and recreation facilities in park deficient areas.

7.H.4 Require notification to school districts of all subdivision applications.

7.H.5 Encourage the location of schools in the urban areas within a safe walking distance for students.

7.H.6 Encourage barrier free elementary school service areas, i.e., minimize service areas bisected by major arterials, highways, railroads, waterways, commercial or industrial areas.

7.H.7 Encourage junior and senior high schools to be centrally located on, or near, an arterial within its service area.

7.I County Government Policies

7.I.1 Promote consolidation of County services and facilities whenever possible.

7.I.2 Work toward developing a major centralized facility for County Government.

7.I.3 Encourage the location of Human Resource services in locations convenient to the citizens of the County.

Last Amended 10/23/21

Return to the Comprehensive Plan main page. Contact zoninginfo@clackamas.us for additional information."

Sidebar Heading
Related Information
New Format?
Off